Does the Rise of China Threaten the Transatlantic Partnership?

{
  "authors": [
    "Philippe Le Corre"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "EP",
  "programs": [
    "Europe"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Other

Does the Rise of China Threaten the Transatlantic Partnership?

For decades Americans have described China as a rising power. That description no longer fits: China has already risen. What does this mean for the U.S.–China relationship?

By Philippe Le Corre

Published on Aug 18, 2022

Harvard University Press

About the Author

Philippe Le Corre

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Europe Program

Philippe Le Corre was a nonresident senior fellow in the Europe Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Recent Work

Q&A
Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine Has Jeopardized the China-EU Relationship
- Paul Haenle, Philippe Le Corre
Paper
China’s Influence in Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe: Vulnerabilities and Resilience in Four Countries
- +1
  Erik Brattberg, Philippe Le Corre, Paul Stronski, …

Foreign Policy East Asia China Iran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Paper
Methods of National Power Analysis: Pitfalls and Best Practices
Power assessments shape our perceptions of the limits of the possible, but quantitative rankings and dashboards can provide false confidence.
Nicholas Kitchen
Article
From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East Asia
The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang
Article
Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI Competition
In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee
Commentary
China Financial Markets
Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?
China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.
Michael Pettis
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Line of flags from all different countries and nations

Paper

Methods of National Power Analysis: Pitfalls and Best Practices

Power assessments shape our perceptions of the limits of the possible, but quantitative rankings and dashboards can provide false confidence.

Nicholas Kitchen

Article

From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East Asia

The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.

Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang

Article

Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI Competition

In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.

Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee

Commentary

China Financial Markets

Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?

China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.

Michael Pettis

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End

For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.

Friedrich Conradi