Carnegie’s Technology and International Affairs Program develops practical insights to help policymakers understand and navigate how technology shapes the evolution of the political and economic relationships of major powers.
Please join Anu Bradford for an engaging online discussion of Digital Empires: The Global Battle to Regulate Technology and the choices we face as societies and individuals, the forces that shape those choices, and the huge stakes involved for everyone who uses digital technologies.
What might be the implications of a cyberweapon that can hack satellites?
Join us for a special event featuring the Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines in conversation with Carnegie’s Dan Baer on combatting digital authoritarianism.
Espionage is a fact of life, yet U.S. discourse often fails to distinguish severe incidents from banal ones. If this pattern continues, the next Chinese spying scandal—however trivial—may spark a true bilateral crisis.
There’s a lot of legitimate concerns with China’s rise and its use of advanced technology. But if Washington moves too fast and too far to cut off the technological relationship with China, it could damage U.S. interests as well.
merica has embarked on one of its most difficult and dangerous international challenges since the Cold War. The task: reversing decades of economic and technological integration with its chief rival, China.
As America’s conscious foray into industrial policy, the CHIPS Act is an important political breakthrough and a potentially transformative piece of legislation.
Washington has dramatically expanded controls on technology flowing to and from Beijing by imposing aggressive sanctions targeting China’s chip and semiconductor industry. What impact will these changes have on the broader U.S.-China relationship?
The U.S. and Chinese governments, for the foreseeable future, will have the resources to keep each other’s society vulnerable to nuclear mass destruction.
The United States has waged low-grade economic warfare against China for at least four years now, b ut Washington’s endgame for this conflict has always been hazy. A regulatory filing from a little-known federal agency may give the strongest hint yet of U.S. intentions.
Adding the company to the SDN List could lead to unpredictable consequences for the United States and the world.
A partial “decoupling” of U.S. and Chinese technology ecosystems is well underway. Without a clear strategy, Washington risks doing too little or—more likely—too much to curb technological interdependence.
