book

Balancing Interests: Rethinking the U.S. Selection of Skilled Immigrants

The current system for selecting permanent and temporary immigrants by U.S. employers is inefficient, unnecessarily burdensome and costly, outdated, and serves U.S. national interests haphazardly.

by Demetrios Papademetriou and Stephen Yale-Loehr
published by
Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1996
 on January 1, 1996

Source: Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1996

The current system for selecting permanent and temporary immigrants by U.S. employers is inefficient, unnecessarily burdensome and costly, outdated, and serves U.S. national interests haphazardly. The authors enter the fray on how to reform "economic stream" immigration, undertaking the first critical evaluation of the present system. After comparing the U.S. selection system to that of most other advanced industrial societies, the authors propose an alternative that enhances U.S. competitiveness while protecting the long-term interests of U.S. workers.

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.