Source: Lawyers Alliance for World Security
paper
White Paper on National Missile Defense
published by on May 1, 2000
Lawyers Alliance for World Security
More work from Carnegie
- researchRussia in the Middle East and North Africa—Disrupting Washington’s Influence and Redefining Moscow’s Global Role
The agency of MENA states and nonstate actors and their multilayered interactions with the United States, China, Russia, and the EU have helped shape the complex outcomes of the great power competition.
- articleThe Case for a New International Climate Policy: Where the U.S. Should Go Next on Climate
Trump likely will again withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement and possibly from the UN climate change framework governing it. U.S. influence on climate affairs may diminish, but the upheaval could give way to other approaches.
- articleThe United States and the “Axis” of Its Enemies: Myths vs. Reality
Since launching its all-out assault on Ukraine, Russia has drawn closer to China, Iran, and North Korea. But have they really formed an “axis?” Their interests have aligned but not merged. It makes little sense and can be even counterproductive to treat these four countries, each guided by its own vision, as a unified coalition.
- articleDeath by a Thousand Paper Cuts: Lessons from the Nordic-Baltic Region on Countering Russian Gray Zone Aggression
A coordinated multilateral response will be more effective than a national one.
- researchAlliance Future: Rewiring Australia and the United States
Too many people in Washington and Canberra presume that the strategic challenge from China alone will make defense coordination within the alliance easy. The reality is that it could sharpen contradictions around the kind of operational planning that will be needed to enhance deterrence. Australian and American defense strategies, while closely aligned, are not identical. To build the alliance will require aligning resources, building complementary regional relationships, and investing in resilience.