Iraq’s new draft constitution, originally due on August 15, is finally scheduled to go to the printing presses so that it can be distributed throughout the country. The final text addresses some of the difficult issues—such as federalism, women's rights, religion, and the country's identity—while sidestepping or even complicating many others. The country's voters will head to the polls on October 15 to decide whether to accept or reject the controversial document.
Nathan J. Brown, an authority on Arab constitutions, has been closely following the drafting process and offers a detailed, article-by-article commentary on the proposed constitution. Brown explores how the document would change Iraqi politics and what loopholes and gaps still remain. He identifies the many questions the constitution simply postpones, how it is likely to lead to a fairly loose confederation rather than a tighter federal structure, and how its rights provisions are far less revolutionary than has been claimed.
The Final Draft of the Iraqi Constitution: Analysis and Commentary
More work from Carnegie
Democracy and GovernanceOur program examines emerging global challenges to democracy and produces policy-relevant research on international support to advance democracy, bolster human rights, and improve governance.
Energy Transition in the Gulf: Best Practices and LimitationsGulf nations face the complex challenge of balancing the costs of energy transition with the urgent need to diversify their economies and strengthen resilience against climate impacts.
- Aisha Al-Sarihi
Yoon’s Impeachment and South Korea’s FutureWhoever the new South Korean president may be, they will inherit a nation plagued by polarized domestic politics, an unpredictable partnership with the United States, and unresolved national security issues. This mix of division and uncertainty must be seen by the next president as an opportunity to reform a broken political system and heal a nation.
A Turning Point, or Not? Principles for a New European OrderDespite repeated declarations of historic turning points, deep structural reforms to the European project remain elusive. While defense spending rises are welcome, EU governments must also pursue systemic changes to Europe’s political and security architecture.
How Regional Security Dialogues Can Address the Grim Realities in the Middle EastFaced with multiple complex conflicts, Arab states need to develop mechanisms of collective action that are not available to them today.
