Iraq’s new draft constitution, originally due on August 15, is finally scheduled to go to the printing presses so that it can be distributed throughout the country. The final text addresses some of the difficult issues—such as federalism, women's rights, religion, and the country's identity—while sidestepping or even complicating many others. The country's voters will head to the polls on October 15 to decide whether to accept or reject the controversial document.
Nathan J. Brown, an authority on Arab constitutions, has been closely following the drafting process and offers a detailed, article-by-article commentary on the proposed constitution. Brown explores how the document would change Iraqi politics and what loopholes and gaps still remain. He identifies the many questions the constitution simply postpones, how it is likely to lead to a fairly loose confederation rather than a tighter federal structure, and how its rights provisions are far less revolutionary than has been claimed.
The Final Draft of the Iraqi Constitution: Analysis and Commentary
More work from Carnegie
Democracy and GovernanceOur program examines emerging global challenges to democracy and produces policy-relevant research on international support to advance democracy, bolster human rights, and improve governance.
Official Islam in the Arab States of the Gulf: Local Establishments in a Regional and Global ContextThe story of religious institutions and the state in the Gulf exemplifies four main points: the “institutional isomorphism” in the region, the place of religion in the nation- and state-building processes, the importance of historic legacy, and the particularities emerging in a novel geopolitical context.
- Nathan J. Brown,
- Bedirhan Mutlu
Reforming for Resilience in Oman: Environmental Risk and Policy CapacityOman is on the path to sustainable national development, but timelines are needed to support accountability.
- Joy Arkeh,
- Nourane Awadallah
For Expertise to Matter, Nonpartisan Institutions Need New Communications StrategiesTo avoid irrelevance when they are needed most, experts and nonpartisan analysts must rethink not just their channels of communication but also their theory of influence.
- Renée DiResta,
- Rachel Kleinfeld
AI Agents and Democratic ResilienceAutonomous AI agents are arriving at a moment of acute vulnerability for liberal democratic orders. Amid deep uncertainty about agents’ prospective capabilities and impacts, this essay considers how they might both accelerate and mitigate the structural pressures loosening democracy’s screws—and how to ensure the robust protection of democratic values in the age of agentic AI.
Knight Foundation
