Iraq’s new draft constitution, originally due on August 15, is finally scheduled to go to the printing presses so that it can be distributed throughout the country. The final text addresses some of the difficult issues—such as federalism, women's rights, religion, and the country's identity—while sidestepping or even complicating many others. The country's voters will head to the polls on October 15 to decide whether to accept or reject the controversial document.
Nathan J. Brown, an authority on Arab constitutions, has been closely following the drafting process and offers a detailed, article-by-article commentary on the proposed constitution. Brown explores how the document would change Iraqi politics and what loopholes and gaps still remain. He identifies the many questions the constitution simply postpones, how it is likely to lead to a fairly loose confederation rather than a tighter federal structure, and how its rights provisions are far less revolutionary than has been claimed.
The Final Draft of the Iraqi Constitution: Analysis and Commentary
More work from Carnegie
Democracy and GovernanceOur program examines emerging global challenges to democracy and produces policy-relevant research on international support to advance democracy, bolster human rights, and improve governance.
Civic Activism in an Intensifying Climate CrisisTo address the deepening climate crisis, climate activism is employing a wider variety of tactics and aiming at a broader set of goals. In response, the movement faces stronger repression and civic backlash against climate action.
- Erin Jones,
- Richard Youngs
Yoon’s Failed Political Coup and South Korea’s Mounting CrisisYoon’s martial law decree lasted only three hours, but the ramifications for his political future and the country’s political divide will go on much longer.
Russia in the Middle East and North Africa—Disrupting Washington’s Influence and Redefining Moscow’s Global RoleThe agency of MENA states and nonstate actors and their multilayered interactions with the United States, China, Russia, and the EU have helped shape the complex outcomes of the great power competition.
The EU’s Triple-Nexus Challenge: Climate, Conflict, DemocracyThe EU’s fragmented approaches to the crises of climate change, conflict, and democracy fall short by not addressing the mutually reinforcing links between them. Brussels needs an integrated strategy to tackle the emerging three-way nexus and mitigate the vulnerabilities it creates.
- +1
- Richard Youngs,
- Ricardo Farinha,
- Jasper Linke,
- Jeremy Wetterwald
