Iraq’s new draft constitution, originally due on August 15, is finally scheduled to go to the printing presses so that it can be distributed throughout the country. The final text addresses some of the difficult issues—such as federalism, women's rights, religion, and the country's identity—while sidestepping or even complicating many others. The country's voters will head to the polls on October 15 to decide whether to accept or reject the controversial document.
Nathan J. Brown, an authority on Arab constitutions, has been closely following the drafting process and offers a detailed, article-by-article commentary on the proposed constitution. Brown explores how the document would change Iraqi politics and what loopholes and gaps still remain. He identifies the many questions the constitution simply postpones, how it is likely to lead to a fairly loose confederation rather than a tighter federal structure, and how its rights provisions are far less revolutionary than has been claimed.
The Final Draft of the Iraqi Constitution: Analysis and Commentary
More work from Carnegie
Democracy and GovernanceOur program examines emerging global challenges to democracy and produces policy-relevant research on international support to advance democracy, bolster human rights, and improve governance.
Is the Arab World Finally Discovering Collective Security and Multilateral Diplomacy?Two big diplomatic wins from this year offer lessons for future Arab efforts toward constructive multilateral action.
The United States and the Emerging Security Order in Eastern SyriaAs Washington reduces its presence in the country, the success of its withdrawal and continued containment of the Islamic State will hinge on adopting an approach of flexible oversight built around three priorities, as well as balancing Turkish and Israeli red lines.
Rules or Deals? The EU’s Challenge in Regulating Corrosive Capital in the Western BalkansThe United Arab Emirates has become a major investor in the Western Balkans. With enlargement back on the agenda, the EU must ensure that foreign capital meets rather than undermines its governance standards.
.jpg)
- +1
- Iliriana Gjoni,
- Iva Čukić,
- Alba Çela,
- Aleksandër Trajçe
By Endorsing the U.S. Gaza Plan, the UN Security Council Elevates “Rule by Law” Over Rule of LawResolution 2803 legitimizes indefinite Israeli control over Gaza in partnership with the United States and facilitates Israel’s plans to block a Palestinian state.
