Iraq’s new draft constitution, originally due on August 15, is finally scheduled to go to the printing presses so that it can be distributed throughout the country. The final text addresses some of the difficult issues—such as federalism, women's rights, religion, and the country's identity—while sidestepping or even complicating many others. The country's voters will head to the polls on October 15 to decide whether to accept or reject the controversial document.
Nathan J. Brown, an authority on Arab constitutions, has been closely following the drafting process and offers a detailed, article-by-article commentary on the proposed constitution. Brown explores how the document would change Iraqi politics and what loopholes and gaps still remain. He identifies the many questions the constitution simply postpones, how it is likely to lead to a fairly loose confederation rather than a tighter federal structure, and how its rights provisions are far less revolutionary than has been claimed.
The Final Draft of the Iraqi Constitution: Analysis and Commentary
More work from Carnegie
Democracy and GovernanceOur program examines emerging global challenges to democracy and produces policy-relevant research on international support to advance democracy, bolster human rights, and improve governance.
.jpg)
Abundance, Complexity, and Political Reform in California and Across the GlobeCalifornia’s difficulties with policy and project gridlock echo in large, complex, wealthy democracies worldwide—and consistent, pragmatic attention to lingering policy problems along with comprehensive political reform may be needed to fix it.
Moldova’s Election Is a Test for Russian Influence in EuropeMoldova’s parliamentary election is make-or-break for the country’s European future. The outcome will test whether Chișinău will stay on the EU accession path or fall prey to Russia’s multi-domain interference campaign.
- Oana Popescu-Zamfir
Can Palestinian Politics Be Revived?In order to succeed, the new proposals to transform Palestinian national institutions into viable state structures must display political realism, resonate among Palestinians, and court robust international support.
Israeli Policy Is Divided Into Two Main Camps. Neither One Offers a Realistic Path Forward.To exit the strategic cul-de-sac, Israeli leaders need to account for today’s political and diplomatic realities, as well as the limits of what military force can accomplish.
