The Iraqi ad-hoc appeals panel set up to examine the banning of over 500 candidates by the Justice and Accountability Commission has concluded its work, reinstating only 26 candidates. Initially, the appeal panel unbanned all candidates provisionally, reserving the right to re-examine the cases of those who won seats in the election. Responding to outrage by Iraq’s major Shi’i political parties as well as to political pressure, including from Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, the panel announced that it had gone beyond its legal responsibilities when it thought it should examine all bans and that it only needed to consider the 177 cases where candidates had appealed. Those cases could be examined and resolved before the March 7 elections. A few days later, most of the 177 banned candidates were excluded from the investigation process on the grounds that they had not filed their appeals properly; only 37 cases would be investigated. On February 11, Ali al-Lami, the head of the Justice and Accountability Commission, announced that 26 candidates (out of over 500) had been “unbanned” and could run.
De-Baathification Saga Verdict
The Iraqi ad-hoc appeals panel, established to examine the Justice and Accountability Commission’s decision to ban over 500 candidates from the upcoming parliamentary elections, has concluded its work and has reinstated only 26 candidates.
More work from Carnegie
Reintegrating Iraqis Returning Home After Conflict: Lessons from Variation Between Four CommunitiesReturn policies and reintegration programming must consider the specificities of local communities and their internal dynamics.
- Mara Revkin,
- Benjamin Krick,
- Raed Aldulaimi
United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research
Yoon’s Failed Political Coup and South Korea’s Mounting CrisisYoon’s martial law decree lasted only three hours, but the ramifications for his political future and the country’s political divide will go on much longer.
Russia in the Middle East and North Africa—Disrupting Washington’s Influence and Redefining Moscow’s Global RoleThe agency of MENA states and nonstate actors and their multilayered interactions with the United States, China, Russia, and the EU have helped shape the complex outcomes of the great power competition.
Overcoming the North-South Divide in Global Migration GovernanceAlthough migration policy trends in Global North and South countries diverge, the two hemispheres both stand to benefit from a more open labor market and more cohesive global migration governance.
- Alan Hirsch
Russia’s Great Energy Game in the Middle EastRussia has largely inherited the Soviet Union’s Middle East foreign policy. China may be best positioned to take advantage of this historical relationship.
