• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Hamdullah Baycar"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Sada",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Sada

China-U.S. Rivalry Enters a New Phase in the Middle East

The recent deal in the heart of the Gulf has raised questions about the American position vis-à-vis China.

Link Copied
By Hamdullah Baycar
Published on May 18, 2023
Sada

Blog

Sada

Sada is an online journal rooted in Carnegie’s Middle East Program that seeks to foster and enrich debate about key political, economic, and social issues in the Arab world and provides a venue for new and established voices to deliver reflective analysis on these issues.

Learn More
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

In March 2023, the headlines were interrupted by an incident that was thought by some to represent the end of U.S. hegemony in the Middle East. China, the United States’ biggest global rival, brokered a deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran, a major American partner and rival, respectively. 

A closer look at the deal, however, shows that the Chinese role was relatively insignificant. Rather,  the credit attributed to the Chinese was a gift offered by Saudi Arabia and Iran, and a result of the lack of a strategic and fair American diplomatic plan in the Middle East. Saudi Arabia’s emphasis on the Chinese role was a clear signal to the U.S. aimed at ensuring an upgrading of American commitments to the Kingdom, with Riyadh reportedly seeking to receive full and renewed assurance for security guarantees, as well as support for a civilian nuclear program. 

Was it a Chinese Game? 

The role of China is much more limited in this deal than media coverage indicated. The negotiations between the two parties have been ongoing for a long time with assistance provided by regional states. In facilitating talks between the two countries, Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi hoped to achieve a better balance between Iran and the Arab Gulf states in Iraq, and decrease unilateral Iranian influence. Oman, which has a good record as a regional mediator, also played a major role in this rapprochement. 

Moreover, rapprochement did not come as a massive surprise in a region that has experienced a relatively peaceful period since the outbreak of the pandemic in 2020. The long-running Gulf crisis between Qatar on one side, and the UAE, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt on the other, came to an end. Additionally, the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco established relations with Israel while Turkey normalized its tense relations, rebuilding close ties with the UAE and Saudi Arabia. 

Finally, diplomatic advances have changed regional calculations regarding Syria and Yemen, two countries where Iran and Saudi Arabia have collided since the Arab Spring. Syria has been welcomed back into the Arab League with Saudi approval, and Saudi officials have entered direct talks with the Houthis, a step that some believe could lead to a broader peace. 

Is it Over for the United States? 

It is no secret that the current U.S. president and the Saudi leadership do not enjoy positive relations. During his campaign, Biden pledged that he would turn the Kingdom into a pariah—a stance he had to give up when the price of oil reached 120 USD per barrel after the Russian invasion of Ukraine. However, relations have not been warm following Biden’s visit to Riyadh in 2022, partly due to the United States’ patronizing attitude, which envisions that regional powers should follow the preferred American path even if it does not fit their national interests.

It is also important to remember that the U.S. has never been considered a just and fair mediator in Middle Eastern conflicts, given its close relations with Israel and its animosity towards Iran.  Furthermore, the American abandonment of the JCPOA, along with its botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, have led to U.S. policies being referred to as “flip-flop” diplomacy for their reactionary and self-interested nature and the lack of consideration they show for allies.  

By involving China in their recent deal, both Iran and Saudi Arabia want to give a clear signal to the U.S. that it can be replaced. Yet, whether it actually will be is still up for debate. While the Chinese economic footprint has grown in the region, Beijing does not appear willing to become more deeply involved in regional competition, at least for now. However, considering the attention that American media organizations and policymakers paid to the Chinese role in the deal, it is certain that the U.S. will be forced to reevaluate its relationships in the region and consider why a partner would turn to China in the first place. 

Hamdullah Baycar is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Arab and Islamic Studies at the University of Exeter. His work focuses on identity politics in the Gulf and international relations.  

Hamdullah Baycar

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Sada

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Sub-Saharan African Migrants in Morocco: Security Concerns and the Test of Human Rights

    Is Morocco’s migration policy protecting Sub-Saharan African migrants or managing them for political and security ends? This article unpacks the gaps, the risks, and the paths toward real rights-based integration.

      Soufiane Elgoumri

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign Policy

    Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.

      Mike Fleet

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Role of E-commerce in Empowering Women in Saudi Arabia: Assessing the Policy Potential

    How can Saudi Arabia turn its booming e-commerce sector into a real engine of economic empowerment for women amid persistent gaps in capital access, digital training, and workplace inclusion? This piece explores the policy fixes, from data-center integration to gender-responsive regulation, that could unlock women’s full potential in the kingdom’s digital economy.

      Hannan Hussain

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A War Fueled by Hate Speech: Sudan’s Fall into Fragmentation

    Hate speech has spread across Sudan and become a key factor in worsening the war between the army and the Rapid Support Forces. The article provides expert analysis and historical background to show how hateful rhetoric has fueled violence, justified atrocities, and weakened national unity, while also suggesting ways to counter it through justice, education, and promoting a culture of peace.

      Samar Sulaiman

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Disarming Palestinian Factions in Lebanon: Can a Security Experiment Evolve into Sovereign Policy?

    The August 2025 government decision to restrict weapons to the Lebanese state, starting with Palestinian arms in the camps, marked a major test of Lebanon’s ability to turn a long-standing slogan into practical policy. Yet the experiment quickly exposed political hesitation, social gaps, and factional divisions, raising the question of whether it can become a model for addressing more sensitive files such as Hezbollah’s weapons.

      Souhayb Jawhar

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.