• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Mohammed A. Salih"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Sada",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [],
  "topics": []
}
Attribution logo

Source: Getty

Commentary
Sada

Much Ado About Nothing: Disinformation Campaigns and Foreign Policy in Iraq

A recent conspiracy about U.S. troops points to the wider problem of unregulated media in Iraq’s polarized political environment.

Link Copied
By Mohammed A. Salih
Published on Oct 3, 2023
Sada

Blog

Sada

Sada is an online journal rooted in Carnegie’s Middle East Program that seeks to foster and enrich debate about key political, economic, and social issues in the Arab world and provides a venue for new and established voices to deliver reflective analysis on these issues.

Learn More
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

In late August, while Iraqis endured a sweltering heat wave, social media and the airwaves buzzed with a deluge of sizzling yet false information. 2,500 U.S. soldiers remain in the country to assist and advise the Iraqi Security Forces, and earlier in the month, there was a routine troop rotation marked by a ceremony at the Erbil Air Base. This was the seed of what quickly became a widespread conspiracy theory on social media and Iraqi television: the idea that the United States was hatching up new regime change schemes in Iraq and neighboring Syria, and planning to limit Iranian influence in Iraq. 

Hashtags—such as #القوات_الامريكية (“American troops”), #العزم_الصلب (“inherent resolve”, referring to ongoing U.S.-led anti-Islamic State operations), #الارتال_الامريكية (American convoys), and #جرف_الصخر (an Iraqi town occupied by pro-Iran armed groups)—popped up on Twitter (X). In some cases, commentators relied on unrelated clips to claim that the Jordanian army was also taking part in U.S.-led plans to close the Iraqi-Syrian border. Soon television hosts, politicians, and purported experts joined the chorus. Even former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki lent credibility to the speculations by suggesting that the U.S. military planned to block the Iraq-Syrian border, likely to topple Bashar al-Assad’s regime next door. 

The groundwork for this conspiracy had been laid as early as mid-2022, when former Iraqi MP Faiq Sheikh generated a buzz by making bogus claims about an international plan to topple the existing regime in Iraq no later than 2024. The idea of a military intervention in service of American interests—as opposed to a mere routine troop rotation—was also seen as consistent with other U.S. military movements in the region, including the deployment of over 3,000 marines to the Gulf in August, reportedly to protect civilian ships from Iranian aggression.

Senior U.S. and Iraqi officials moved quickly to deny the false claims. But the public commotion demonstrates how Iraqi social and traditional media spheres have become a battleground for foreign policy disinformation campaigns. Notably, the hashtags bore signs of a premeditated campaign, with many seemingly fake accounts peddling disinformation. Groups with markedly different political orientations soon got involved: on one side was an ideologically incongruent collection of individuals who oppose the current Iran-aligned government, and on other were social media figures and accounts affiliated with the pro-Iranian militia groups.

While different motives animated each camp, they both sought to spread disinformation and harness public attention to their advantage. The first side’s goal was to insinuate that the grip of pro-Iran Shia groups on power was weak, and sow panic among their popular base. In doing so, they were capitalizing on widespread feelings of discontent toward the dominant militias and political elites and their perceived corruption. The latter side promoted the claim the U.S. was indeed up to some nefarious plan, such as toppling Assad regime or propping up ISIS. They used the occasion to flex their muscles, push for the expulsion of U.S. troops from Iraq, and boost their anti-American credentials.

Although this campaign has subsided, similar incidents are to be expected. Another recent conspiracy promotes the idea that foreign embassies and organizations are working to normalize homosexuality and non-traditional gender roles. Fundamentally, the country's unregulated social media ecosystem and its highly partisan broadcast media, set within a deeply fragmented and populist political culture, is a fertile breeding ground for the emergence and dissemination of disinformation. In this context, actors with diverse political motives will continue to strive to manipulate the media, especially social media platforms, in order to shape Iraq's foreign relations.

Mohammed A. Salih is a Senior Fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia. He holds a Ph.D. in communication from the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg School for Communication, and his research and writing focuses on Iraq and regional issues. Follow him on X @MohammedASalih.

Mohammed A. Salih

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Sada

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Sub-Saharan African Migrants in Morocco: Security Concerns and the Test of Human Rights

    Is Morocco’s migration policy protecting Sub-Saharan African migrants or managing them for political and security ends? This article unpacks the gaps, the risks, and the paths toward real rights-based integration.

      Soufiane Elgoumri

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A House Divided: How Internal Power Struggles Shape Iraq’s Foreign Policy

    Iraq’s foreign policy is being shaped by its own internal battles—fractured elites, competing militias, and a state struggling to speak with one voice. The article asks: How do these divisions affect Iraq’s ability to balance between the U.S. and Iran? Can Baghdad use its “good neighbor” approach to reduce regional tensions? And what will it take for Iraq to turn regional investments into real stability at home? It explores potential solutions, including strengthening state institutions, curbing rogue militias, improving governance, and using regional partnerships to address core economic and security weaknesses so Iraq can finally build a unified and sustainable foreign policy.

      Mike Fleet

  • Commentary
    Sada
    The Role of E-commerce in Empowering Women in Saudi Arabia: Assessing the Policy Potential

    How can Saudi Arabia turn its booming e-commerce sector into a real engine of economic empowerment for women amid persistent gaps in capital access, digital training, and workplace inclusion? This piece explores the policy fixes, from data-center integration to gender-responsive regulation, that could unlock women’s full potential in the kingdom’s digital economy.

      Hannan Hussain

  • Commentary
    Sada
    A War Fueled by Hate Speech: Sudan’s Fall into Fragmentation

    Hate speech has spread across Sudan and become a key factor in worsening the war between the army and the Rapid Support Forces. The article provides expert analysis and historical background to show how hateful rhetoric has fueled violence, justified atrocities, and weakened national unity, while also suggesting ways to counter it through justice, education, and promoting a culture of peace.

      Samar Sulaiman

  • Commentary
    Sada
    Disarming Palestinian Factions in Lebanon: Can a Security Experiment Evolve into Sovereign Policy?

    The August 2025 government decision to restrict weapons to the Lebanese state, starting with Palestinian arms in the camps, marked a major test of Lebanon’s ability to turn a long-standing slogan into practical policy. Yet the experiment quickly exposed political hesitation, social gaps, and factional divisions, raising the question of whether it can become a model for addressing more sensitive files such as Hezbollah’s weapons.

      Souhayb Jawhar

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.