Paper
Douglas H. Paal
Source: Getty
Article
America Recognizes 'Rise of Asia'
The next U.S. administration should commit greater leadership time to developing a more considered and engaged Asian policy that begins with a call for a new multilateral organization in East Asia.
Published on Sep 19, 2008
A senior US figure has predicted that the incoming US administration will commit greater leadership time to developing a more considered and engaged Asian policy.
Interviewed by PublicAffairsAsia.com, Doug Paal, a former adviser to George W Bush, says it is essential for the White House to address the geo-political consequences of "the rise of India and China".
"The US has for some time had a standard rhetoric of the recognition of the importance of Asia, but when it comes to turning up to meetings or to devoting leadership time to Asia it does not happen," he says.
"That’s partly because of the conflicts that are currently being fought. But with a new administration there will be a chance to take advantage of the fact that we are at an inflection point in history."
He also says that the US now recognises its increasing dependence on Asian nations.
"We have talked for 25 years about the rise of Asia, but the fact is look at look at the industrialisation, look at the sovereign wealth, look at the demographics," he said.
"In the next 25 years Asian states are going to be more important to us and we need to apportion our talents and our time accordingly."
Paal, who now holds a senior position at the Carnegie Endowment for World Peace, also calls for the construction of "a new multi-lateral organisation" for East Asia.
“We should all be throwing out ideas to find out what sort of organisation suits the broadest group of parties the most,” he says.
The interview originally appeared at PublicAffairsAsia.com.
About the Author
Douglas H. Paal
Distinguished Fellow, Asia Program
Paal previously served as vice chairman of JPMorgan Chase International and as unofficial U.S. representative to Taiwan as director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
- America’s Future in a Dynamic Asia
- U.S.-China Relations at the Forty-Year MarkQ&A
- +1
Douglas H. Paal, Tong Zhao, Chen Qi, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- How Le Pen Benefits from the Stalemate in UkraineCommentary
The domestic impacts of how long it is taking to end the war in Ukraine have pushed the French electorate to the political extremes and compromised the country’s diplomatic capacity.
Rym Momtaz
- Squandering Attraction: How the Second Trump Administration is Undermining American Soft PowerPaper
Soft power on its own is insufficient to meet U.S. national security needs, but hard power also has its limits. Soft power allows for more effective and efficient use of hard power than hard power alone, as it encourages cooperation and compliance which deters the need for hard power.
Sarah Yerkes
- Battery Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of Lithium-Ion Tech PolicyResearch
A deep dive into the policy ecosystems behind battery development in China, South Korea, Japan, the European Union (including some of its member states), the United States, Canada, and India.
- +5
Milo McBride, Herbert Crowther, Darcie Draudt-Véjares, …
- The Israel Lobby, U.S. Foreign Policy, and Domestic LibertiesCommentary
In an interview, Ian Lustick and Eli Clifton discuss their new book on why a prominent ally has so much influence in America.
Michael Young
- AI Breakout Capacity: A Middle-Power Path Between Racing and DependencePaper
Germany, India, and other middle powers can’t build frontier AI alone, and they risk being cut off if they depend on the United States or China. The way through is to build the capacity for a frontier sprint while hoping never to use it.
Anton Leicht, Sam Winter-Levy
