George Perkovich
{
"authors": [
"George Perkovich"
],
"type": "testimony",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [
"U.S. Nuclear Policy"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States"
],
"topics": [
"Foreign Policy",
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}Source: Getty
Obama's Nuclear Agenda: Is Full Disarmament Possible?
The Obama administration’s new Nuclear Posture Review reduces the role and number of U.S. nuclear weapons, identifies nuclear terrorism as the principal threat to the United States, and works to maintain a stable strategic relationship with China.
Source: Pacific Council Teleconference

Nuclear Terrorism
- Perkovich noted that nuclear terrorism is “one of the easiest problems to redress because the number of actors you have to mobilize” to secure weapons-usable materials “is relatively small.”
Reducing the Role of Nuclear Weapons
- Advances in targeting and information technology have made it possible to use precision conventional weapons for missions previously assigned to nuclear weapons. “The politics are just catching up” to these military innovations, Perkovich said.
Addressing China
- Perkovich said the NPR’s approach to China was perhaps its “most important” yet unsung innovation. The NPR acknowledges, albeit in “very indirect language,” that China and the United States are mutually vulnerable to each other’s nuclear weapons, much in the way the United States and Russia continue to be since the days of the Cold War.
- If the strategic relationship between the two countries is to remain stable, the United States will have to convince China that it will not seek missile defenses “large and capable” enough to remove China’s ability to retaliate to an American nuclear attack, Perkovich said.
Will Iran build nuclear weapons?
- Perkovich said the answer hinges on whether Iran opts for a “Japan strategy,” in which Iran retains the capability to develop nuclear weapons but stops short of doing so, or a “Pakistan strategy” in which Iran rushes to build a nuclear weapon as soon as it is technically able.
About the Author
Japan Chair for a World Without Nuclear Weapons, Senior Fellow
George Perkovich is the Japan Chair for a World Without Nuclear Weapons and a senior fellow in the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace’s Nuclear Policy Program. He works primarily on nuclear deterrence, nonproliferation, and disarmament issues, and is leading a study on nuclear signaling in the 21st century.
- How to Assess Nuclear ‘Threats’ in the Twenty-First CenturyPaper
- “A House of Dynamite” Shows Why No Leader Should Have a Nuclear TriggerCommentary
George Perkovich
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- France, Italy, and Spain Should Use Force in LebanonCommentary
Europe has been standing by while its Southern neighborhood is being redrawn by force. To establish a path to peace between Israel and Lebanon, it’s time for Europeans to get involved with hard power.
Rym Momtaz
- What’s Having More Impact on Russian Oil Export Revenues: Ukrainian Strikes or Rising Prices?Commentary
Although Ukrainian strikes have led to a noticeable decline in the physical volume of Russian oil exports, the rise in prices has more than made up for it.
Sergey Vakulenko
- The U.S. Export-Import Bank Was Built for a Different Era. Here's How to Fix It.Commentary
Five problems—and solutions—to make it actually work as a tool of great power competition.
Afreen Akhter
- Russia Is Meddling for Meddling’s Sake in the Middle EastCommentary
The Russian leadership wants to avoid a dangerous precedent in which it is squeezed out of Iran by the United States and Israel—and left powerless to respond in any meaningful way.
Nikita Smagin
- Three Scenarios for the Gulf States After the Iran WarCommentary
One is hopeful. One is realistic. One is cautionary.
Andrew Leber, Sam Worby