Russia Softens Stance on Syria

{
  "authors": [
    "Matthew Rojansky"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Eurasia in Transition"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "Middle East",
    "Syria",
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

Russia Softens Stance on Syria

The Russian government may be changing its attitude towards Syria and penalizing the Assad regime for failing to heed Moscow's advice.

By Matthew Rojansky

Published on Mar 20, 2012

Source: CTV (Canada)

Speaking on CTV, Carnegie’s Matthew Rojansky explained that the Russian government may be changing its attitude toward Syria. “I think the Russian perspective is that they are not the ones who have changed. Two other parties have changed,” said Rojansky. First, the international community has come to Russia in a more supplicant mode, acknowledging Russia as the pivotal party with leverage on Assad. “Once again, Russia has proved the indispensable man, so to speak, in international security,” argued Rojansky. “The second change, at least in Sergey Lavrov’s, Russia’s foreign minister’s view, is that the Assad regime has failed to listen to Russia’s wise advise and that Assad has misplayed his own hand, and I think Russia is therefore, in some respects, punishing him,” he added.

Russia’s Foreign Policy Position: “Russians like to have an independent position,” argued Rojansky. “What they mean by that is that they will not let the West tell them what to do and will not let the Arab League tell them what to do. And they have done that. They have staked out an independent position on Syria.”
Financial Stake in Syria: Russia has long-standing financial interests in Syria, including Soviet-era weapons, new arms deals, energy and oil services deals, and the military base at Tartus. All of those things had appeared to be a lost cause as recently as a few months ago, but "now it looks like they might actually be able to extract a deal to keep those,” said Rojansky.
Lesson to Syria: “Russia has handled its own protest much better, and that is the message they would like Kofi Annan to deliver,” said Rojansky. “Syria has got to be much smarter, stop killing innocent people, and look at the Russian model."
Russia’s Domestic Politics: Before the March 2012 presidential election in Russia, it was extremely important that Putin not seem to accept the notion that a public protest movement could bring down what he views as a legitimate regime, said Rojansky. “After his reelection, he has kind of got a new lease on life, and he knows that that lease is contingent on his delivering a sense of fresh air, and freedom, and reform,” he added. Putin’s legitimacy domestically depends on Russia maintaining its great power status, including exercising influence through international instruments, like the UN Security Council. “If Russia finds itself being sidelined, then it chips away at the image of Putin as a great leader, and that is something he cannot afford,” concluded Rojansky.

This intervew originally aired on CTV (Canada).

About the Author

Matthew Rojansky

Former Deputy Director, Russia and Eurasia Program

Rojansky, formerly executive director of the Partnership for a Secure America, is an expert on U.S. and Russian national security and nuclear-weapon policies.

Recent Work

Paper
An Opportunity for Ambition: Ukraine’s OSCE Chairmanship
- Matthew Rojansky
In The Media
Presiding Over the OSCE: Challenges and Opportunities
- Matthew Rojansky

Political Reform Security Foreign Policy Middle East Syria Caucasus Russia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Next Steps Toward Peace After the Armenian Elections
It’s time to build momentum, and Ankara is the venue of the next opportune diplomatic window to do this.
Alper Coşkun, Garo Paylan
Commentary
Strategic Europe
European Security Strategy: In Search of a New Ambition
The EU is putting together a new security strategy to meet today’s myriad challenges. But for any proposal to be effective, the union needs to grapple with its identity and ambitions.
Pierre Vimont
Commentary
Reviving Kosovo-Serbia Normalization Talks
Three years after the Ohrid Agreement, Kosovo and Serbia remain far from normalization. To revive implementation, the EU should abandon its ambiguity and act as an even-handed arbitrator.
+1
Miloš Pavković, Fitim Gashi, Iliriana Gjoni, …
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Will Russia–Armenia Relations Improve Following Pashinyan’s Re-Election?
For all the menacing rhetoric, the Armenian prime minister remains a leader with whom Putin is prepared to interact: not as an ally, but as a partner, albeit a problematic one.
Alexander Atasuntsev
Commentary
Emissary
Washington and Tehran’s Very Dangerous Moment
The Islamic Republic’s words and actions suggest that it has changed its approach to both diplomacy and war.
Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Pashinyan surrounded by supporters while speaking to reporters

Commentary

Next Steps Toward Peace After the Armenian Elections

It’s time to build momentum, and Ankara is the venue of the next opportune diplomatic window to do this.

Alper Coşkun, Garo Paylan

Commentary

Strategic Europe

European Security Strategy: In Search of a New Ambition

The EU is putting together a new security strategy to meet today’s myriad challenges. But for any proposal to be effective, the union needs to grapple with its identity and ambitions.

Pierre Vimont

Commentary

Reviving Kosovo-Serbia Normalization Talks

Three years after the Ohrid Agreement, Kosovo and Serbia remain far from normalization. To revive implementation, the EU should abandon its ambiguity and act as an even-handed arbitrator.

- +1
Miloš Pavković, Fitim Gashi, Iliriana Gjoni, …

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Will Russia–Armenia Relations Improve Following Pashinyan’s Re-Election?

For all the menacing rhetoric, the Armenian prime minister remains a leader with whom Putin is prepared to interact: not as an ally, but as a partner, albeit a problematic one.

Alexander Atasuntsev

Commentary

Emissary

Washington and Tehran’s Very Dangerous Moment

The Islamic Republic’s words and actions suggest that it has changed its approach to both diplomacy and war.

Mohammad Ayatollahi Tabaar