• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Sophia Besch",
    "Jon Bateman"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Emissary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "China",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Climate Change",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Economy",
    "Technology"
  ]
}
Attribution logo
A man dusting an orange BYD electric car at an auto show

Source: Getty

Commentary
Emissary

Biden’s Latest Tariffs on China: Why Now?

Domestic politics are a major factor, but not the only one.

Link Copied
By Sophia Besch and Jon Bateman
Published on May 30, 2024
Emissary

Blog

Emissary

Emissary harnesses Carnegie’s global scholarship to deliver incisive, nuanced analysis on the most pressing international affairs challenges.

Learn More

Earlier this month, U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration announced new tariffs on several categories of Chinese imports—most notably, electric vehicles (EVs). On this week’s episode of The World Unpacked, host Sophia Besch talks with Jon Bateman, a senior fellow in the Technology and International Affairs Program and author of a 2022 report on U.S.-China tech decoupling. An excerpt from their conversation, which has been edited for clarity, is below.

Sophia Besch: The announcement of these new tariffs a couple of weeks ago was, at the surface, triggered by a four-year review of former U.S. president Donald Trump’s tariffs. But we also have an election coming up here in the United States. Can you help us situate this decision in the context of U.S. politics?

Jon Bateman: Politics are a huge driver here, [but] I don’t want to oversell it. I think sometimes people on the Chinese side believe that everything that Washington does is purely a function of domestic politics and there isn’t actually a sincere belief in these measures, which really there is.

But yes, this is an election year, and [that’s particularly important] when it comes to electric vehicles—let’s start there. EVs are the sector that Biden put the harshest tariffs on: a 100 percent tariff that virtually guarantees that Chinese EVs will not penetrate the U.S. market. They’re not being sold today, and [the tariff will] essentially guarantee that they won’t be sold in the future. This is very important for the U.S. auto industry, which is heavily centered in parts of the country that will be swing states deciding this election—Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania. These are the states that Biden and Trump both feel that they need to win to win the presidency in 2024.

So there is an ongoing battle, on the one hand, between the United States and China for market share in the global auto manufacturing marketplace, and then also between internal combustion engines and EVs. And both of these friction points are potential threats to jobs in these heartland states. Undoubtedly, Biden is trying to show that he is making a strong play to protect those jobs.

Sophia Besch: Smaller allies are acting in the context of a changing world and of that economic order eroding. Their options are also becoming fewer. And so that might also be one of the reasons that they’re aligning with the U.S. on [these tariffs].

Jon Bateman: The U.S. often says we don’t want countries to have to choose between the United States and China. That's patently false. We absolutely do want countries to choose. And they’re making that choice. They’re trying to avoid it as much as possible, but many countries are choosing the United States in some form or fashion.

When the U.S. put in these export controls, I thought to myself: the U.S. is trying to derisk and decouple as aggressively as possible within several key constraints. One of those constraints is what allies and partners can stomach. Another constraint is what U.S. industry can tolerate. And a third constraint is Chinese potential retaliation—and perhaps more broadly, the global economic system and entities like the World Trade Organization.

I think from a Biden administration perspective, all of those systems and constraints have basically held. We haven’t gotten extreme pushback on any U.S. policy or even the collection of U.S. policies. I think if anything, that could be seen as validating the administration’s approach. It also makes it very likely that it’ll be full steam ahead and that the U.S. government will keep pushing until one or more of those systems or constraints pushes back hard.

To listen to the full episode, use the player below or your favorite podcast app.

About the Authors

Sophia Besch

Former Senior Fellow, Europe Program

Sophia Besch was a senior fellow in the Europe Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Her research focuses on European foreign and defense policy.

Jon Bateman
Jon Bateman

Senior Fellow and Co-Director, Technology and International Affairs Program

Jon Bateman is a senior fellow and co-director of the Technology and International Affairs Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Authors

Sophia Besch
Former Senior Fellow, Europe Program
Sophia Besch
Jon Bateman
Senior Fellow and Co-Director, Technology and International Affairs Program
Jon Bateman
Climate ChangeForeign PolicyEconomyTechnologyChinaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Emissary

  • Trump walking toward Xi, both with arms extended to shake hands
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The U.S. and China Need an AI Hotline. Here’s How to Build It.

    It should address the shortcomings of previous crisis communication efforts and adapt to the demands of frontier AI.

      • Lucy Luo

      Lucy Luo

  • Soldiers standing behind barbed wire
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The UN Isn’t Declining. It’s Decomposing.

    Washington’s decision to support some UN functions while letting others wither is pulling the organization apart at the seams.

      Stewart Patrick, Theodore Zaritsky

  • Two men sitting on a stage and speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    What Would Need to Happen to Slow AI Development?

    AI capabilities are moving fast. Most institutions—including governments—can’t keep up.

      • Anton Leicht

      Anton Leicht, Scott Singer

  • circles of chairs in a large, formal room
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The UN Security Council Is Deadlocked on Climate. New Members Have a Path Forward.

    They face an uphill climb, but they could draw on a strategy that other diplomats have used in the past.

      • Shana Tabak headshot
      • Alejandro Rodriguez

      Shana Tabak, Alejandro Martin Rodriguez

  • silhouetted figure watching a row of TVs.
    Commentary
    Emissary
    9/11 at 25: A Reading List for Understanding the War on Terror

    The books, podcasts, and films that explain the world it made.

      • Andrew Leber

      Andrew Leber

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.