• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
Democracy
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Oliver Stuenkel"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "blog": "Emissary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Trump’s Disruptive 100 Days",
    "Global Democracy"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [
    "Democracy, Conflict, and Governance"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States",
    "Brazil"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Global Governance",
    "Trade",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}
Attribution logo
Trump and Lula on a green background

(Photos by Getty Images)

Commentary
Emissary

The Risks—and One Major Opportunity—Trump Presents to Brazil

Brasília hopes to position itself as a constructive and autonomous voice as the international system grows more contested.

Link Copied
By Oliver Stuenkel
Published on Apr 28, 2025
Emissary

Blog

Emissary

Emissary harnesses Carnegie’s global scholarship to deliver incisive, nuanced analysis on the most pressing international affairs challenges.

Learn More
Program mobile hero image

Program

Democracy, Conflict, and Governance

The Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program is a leading source of independent policy research, writing, and outreach on global democracy, conflict, and governance. It analyzes and seeks to improve international efforts to reduce democratic backsliding, mitigate conflict and violence, overcome political polarization, promote gender equality, and advance pro-democratic uses of new technologies.

Learn More

This piece is part of a Carnegie series examining the impacts of Trump’s first 100 days in office.

For Brazil, U.S. President Donald Trump’s return to the White House presents at least two significant risks and one strategic opportunity in the bilateral relationship and the evolving global order. These risks are primarily political and economic, while the opportunity reflects Brazil’s long-standing ambition to position itself as an autonomous actor in a multipolar world.

The first risk is political contagion. Brazil will hold its next presidential election in October 2026, and Trump’s reemergence has emboldened far-right actors domestically. U.S. politics is highly visible in Brazilian public discourse, and recent political events in Brazil—such as the 2018 election of far-right populist Jair Bolsonaro, his refusal to concede defeat in 2022, and the January 2023 storming of government buildings by his supporters—closely mirrored dynamics in the United States. Trump-inspired rhetoric, including attacks on higher education and the so-called deep state, has heavily influenced the Brazilian right. Bolsonaro, now barred from running due to a conviction by Brazil’s electoral court, has called for “support from abroad” to save Brazil from what he claims is a descent into dictatorship, as he faces coup-related charges that could lead to imprisonment ahead of the elections.

Bolsonaro and his allies see Trump’s return as a chance to rebuild legitimacy and gain international backing. Eduardo Bolsonaro, the former president’s son, recently stepped down from his seat in the National Congress and moved to the United States—possibly to avoid legal troubles, but more likely to strengthen ties with U.S. far-right networks. Should Trump or high-profile figures such as Elon Musk intervene in Brazil’s electoral process, as Musk has recently done in Germany, the bilateral relationship could suffer severe strain.

The second risk is economic. Although some sectors of the Brazilian economy could benefit from the U.S.-China trade war—agribusiness may increase exports to China, and Brazil’s footwear sector, the largest outside Asia, could gain access to U.S. markets—the downsides could be numerous. Trump’s new tariffs are likely to redirect Chinese exports away from the United States and toward countries such as Brazil, flooding local markets with cheaper goods. This could deepen Brazil’s ongoing deindustrialization, pressure domestic manufacturers, and potentially force Brazil to raise tariffs on Chinese imports, complicating its most important trade relationship. Although President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s government has responded cautiously so far, any deterioration in global economic conditions would pose serious challenges for Brazil’s economic recovery and its efforts to combat poverty and inequality.

At the same time, Trump’s foreign policy approach reinforces Brazil’s preference for a multipolar world order—an orientation that predates the current administration. Brasília has long sought to reduce its dependence on the West and expand relations with China, Russia, and the Global South. Trump’s attacks on multilateralism and Western alliances create space for Brazil to assert greater diplomatic autonomy. Lula’s recent state visit to Japan and upcoming trips to China and Russia reflect this ambition. Brazil hopes to fly below Washington’s radar while enhancing its influence in a less cohesive international system. Trump’s more confrontational stance toward the European Union has raised hopes in Brasília that countries such as France, which have so far opposed ratifying the EU-Mercosur trade agreement, may now support it as part of Europe’s own diversification strategy.

Brazil’s role as host of key global summits aligns with this broader diplomatic vision. In November 2024, Brazil hosted the G20 summit. In July, it will host the annual summit for BRICS, now expanded to include Indonesia and a new slate of Global South partners. The event is an opportunity for Brazil to increase its global visibility and reaffirm its ambition to shape international debates on climate change, multilateral governance, and the energy transition. In November, Brazil will host COP30 in Belém, further positioning itself as a bridge-builder between developed and developing countries during a period of geopolitical instability.

Brazil’s geographic distance from the regions that make headlines provides a degree of insulation from the issues that dominate Trump’s foreign policy agenda. Even when it comes to migration from Latin America, Brazil is far less visible than Mexico, Venezuela, or Central American nations. Brazilian policymakers see this as an asset, allowing the country to pursue an independent agenda without attracting undue attention or pressure from Washington. This helps explain why Lula has restrained himself to only occasional criticisms of Trump. Additionally, the fact that the United States runs a trade surplus with Brazil makes it a less likely target of punitive tariffs and reduces Brazil’s potential exposure to the protectionist backlash that has hit other nations.

Nonetheless, Trump’s more transactional foreign policy and more limited commitment to a rules-based order increase risks for a country like Brazil, which lacks military power and relies heavily on a stable and predictable global environment. Growing uncertainty reinforces Brazil’s desire to hedge its bets, diversify its partnerships, and increase strategic wiggle room.

Ultimately, Brazil seeks to minimize friction with Washington while expanding its global footprint. Trump’s return reinforces the urgency of this approach. For Brasília, the key lies in maintaining flexibility, avoiding open confrontation, and leveraging global disorder to advance its own priorities. As the international system grows more contested and multipolar, Brazil hopes to position itself as a constructive and autonomous voice—an emerging power that can engage all sides while avoiding entanglement in great power rivalries.

Read more from this series, including:

  • India Sees Opportunity in Trump’s Global Turbulence. That Could Backfire.
  • Russia Is Playing Along With Trump’s Hopes for a Rapprochement
  • Erdoğan’s Bet on Trump Is Paying Off
Oliver Stuenkel
Senior Fellow, Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program
Oliver Stuenkel
Global GovernanceTradeForeign PolicyUnited StatesBrazil

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Emissary

  • Group of people walking and waving
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Can Venezuela Move From Economic Stabilization to a Democratic Transition?

    Venezuelans deserve to participate in collective decisionmaking and determine their own futures.

      Jennifer McCoy

  • People on a stage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Dangerous Consequences of Treating Colombia Like Venezuela

    When democracies and autocracies are seen as interchangeable targets, the language of democracy becomes hollow, and the incentives for democratic governance erode.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes, Amr Hamzawy

  • Soldier looking at a drone on the ground
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Are All Wars Now Drone Wars?

    From Sudan to Ukraine, UAVs have upended warfighting tactics and become one of the most destructive weapons of conflict.

      • Jon Bateman

      Jon Bateman, Steve Feldstein

  • Carney speaking on stage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Carney’s Remarkable Message to Middle Powers

    And how they can respond.

      • +1

      Sophia Besch, Steve Feldstein, Stewart Patrick, …

  • Trump speaking on a stage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Greenland Episode Must Be a Lesson for Europe and NATO

    They cannot return to the comforts of asymmetric reliance, dressed up as partnership.

      Sophia Besch

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.