Source: Carnegie
How Real is the Threat and How Major Are the Conseqences?
published by on June 27, 2000
Carnegie
More work from Carnegie
How Washington and Tehran Are Assessing Their Next StepsIran’s capacity has been significantly degraded, but its intent hasn’t changed. The United States’s endgame is less clear.
- Aaron David Miller,
- David Petraeus,
- Karim Sadjadpour
The Small Window for an EU-U.S. Diplomatic Push on IranTo turn U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear program into a long-term resolution, Washington should seize the moment and cooperate with France, Germany, and the UK on diplomatic talks.
The Most Significant Long-Term Consequence of the U.S. Strikes on IranIt’s not the damage to Fordow or Natanz.
Taking the Pulse: Does Meeting the 5 Percent of GDP Target Enable Europe to Confront the Russian Threat?At the NATO summit, allies committed to increase their defense spending to the equivalent of 5 percent of their gross domestic product by 2035. Can this target translate into the capabilities and readiness needed to deter Russian aggression?
Does Collective Security in the Middle East Still Have a Chance?With conflict raging and power imbalances rising, the region’s key middle and mediating powers are losing their fight to bring stability to the region.
