Conditional Cash Transfers in Brazil, Chile, and Mexico: Impacts Upon Inequality

{
  "authors": [
    "Eduardo Zepeda",
    "Sergei Soares",
    "Rafael Guerreiro Osório",
    "Fábio Veras Soares",
    "Marcelo Medeiros"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "South America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy"
  ]
}

In The Media

Conditional Cash Transfers in Brazil, Chile, and Mexico: Impacts Upon Inequality

Conditional Cash Tranfers have reduced inequality in three Latin American countries: Brazil, Mexico, and Chile. While they represent only a small share of total income, they have lead to a 21 percent drop in inequality in Brazil and Mexico, and to 15 percent reduction in Chile.

By Eduardo Zepeda, Sergei Soares, Rafael Guerreiro Osório, Fábio Veras Soares, Marcelo Medeiros

Published on Feb 1, 2009

Source: Estudios Economicos

In a new policy paper, Carnegie's Eduardo Zepeda and associates decompose changes in the Gini coefficient to investigate whether the Conditional Cash Tranfers (CCT) have had an inequality reducing effect in three Latin American countries: Brazil, Mexico and Chile. They conclude that CCT programs helped reducing inequality between the mid-1990s and the mid-2000s. The share of total income represented by the CCTs is very small, less than 1%. But as their targeting is outstanding, the equalizing impact of CCTs was responsible for about 21% of the fall in Brazilian and Mexican inequality figures. In Chile, the effect was responsible for around 15% of the reduction.

About the Authors

Eduardo Zepeda

Former Senior Associate, Trade, Equity and Development Program

Zepeda is inter-regional policy coordinator of the Development Policy and Analysis Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs at the United Nations General Secretariat. He was previously a senior associate in the Trade, Equity, and Development Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Sergei Soares

Rafael Guerreiro Osório

International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth

Fábio Veras Soares

International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth

Marcelo Medeiros

Economy North America South America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Emissary
Senegal’s Debt Crisis Has Moved Its Leaders from Partners to Rivals
The impacts of the Faye-Sonko rupture could go well beyond the country’s borders.
Lesley Anne Warner
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse
A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.
Alexandra Prokopenko
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Could Migrants From India and Africa Solve Russia’s Labor Shortage?
The demands of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine, demographic problems, and public hostility toward Central Asians mean Russia does not have enough workers.
Salavat Abylkalikov
Commentary
Post U.S.-China Summit: Managed Instability
The U.S.-China Summit produced a welcome commitment to build a constructive, strategically stable relationship. However, the United States has a full agenda, including the USMCA review beginning this week, that will likely target Chinese practices of concern. If China views these efforts as inconsistent with the agreements reached in Beijing, it may slow or halt progress in response.
Barbara Weisel
Commentary
Can Europe Compete with the United States and China?
Between the United States’ market-driven approach and China's state-led industrial strategy, Europe is reckoning with how it can remain competitive in the global economy. But is Europe in danger of becoming a U.S. or China colony?
Noah Barkin, Anu Bradford

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary

Emissary

Senegal’s Debt Crisis Has Moved Its Leaders from Partners to Rivals

The impacts of the Faye-Sonko rupture could go well beyond the country’s borders.

Lesley Anne Warner

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse

A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.

Alexandra Prokopenko

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Could Migrants From India and Africa Solve Russia’s Labor Shortage?

The demands of the Kremlin’s war in Ukraine, demographic problems, and public hostility toward Central Asians mean Russia does not have enough workers.

Salavat Abylkalikov

Chinese President Xi Jinping interacts with U.S. President Donald Trump during a state banquet at the Great Hall of the People on May 14, 2026 in Beijing, China.

Commentary

Post U.S.-China Summit: Managed Instability

The U.S.-China Summit produced a welcome commitment to build a constructive, strategically stable relationship. However, the United States has a full agenda, including the USMCA review beginning this week, that will likely target Chinese practices of concern. If China views these efforts as inconsistent with the agreements reached in Beijing, it may slow or halt progress in response.

Barbara Weisel

Commentary

Can Europe Compete with the United States and China?

Between the United States’ market-driven approach and China's state-led industrial strategy, Europe is reckoning with how it can remain competitive in the global economy. But is Europe in danger of becoming a U.S. or China colony?

Noah Barkin, Anu Bradford