A World Transformed: The Great Hollowing Out and the Rise of New Threats

{
  "authors": [
    "David Rothkopf"
  ],
  "type": "testimony",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Military",
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Testimony

A World Transformed: The Great Hollowing Out and the Rise of New Threats

The turmoil of the global economic crisis will beget political turmoil, posing a range of security threats that the U.S. must address carefully and pointedly.

By David Rothkopf

Published on Mar 12, 2009

Source: House Armed Services Committee Hearing

While it is still too early to determine for how long the economic dimensions of the global downturn will continue to challenge leaders and populations worldwide, it is already clear that economic turmoil will inevitably beget political turmoil. In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, David Rothkopf explained how to look at the different ways that the crisis is likely to impact geopolitics and U.S. national security interests. He presented a taxonomy of threats followed by examples of specific flashpoints around the world.

Rothkopf outlined a range of dire forecasts for the global economy, then elaborated on the ways the crisis will drive destabilization on national, regional, and global scales. Ultimately, the destabilizing effects of the crisis will spark geopolitical tensions with far-reaching impacts. He stressed that the U.S. must choose its priorities carefully and address the most critical issues first.

The greatest threats associated with the crisis include:

The economic and political constraints placed on the United States
The economic and political constraints placed on the EU, China and other potentially stabilizing actors
The crisis of confidence in institutions worldwide, and the threats to the international system
The exacerbation of critical threats associated with proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
The consequences of protracted crisis for the world’s weakest states
The threats to weak and weakened states directly impacting U.S. national interests

To address these threats, Rothkopf offered a set of recommendations that could minimize the national security risks posed by the crisis.

Key recommendations for U.S. policy:

Be strategic about marshalling and maintaining U.S. Resources (exercise fiscal restraint and rethink defense budgeting)
Maximize the means of leveraging U.S. power (maintaining critical institutions and alliances)
Lead a coordinated, proactive global effort to reduce, eliminate or contain threats (beginning with economic threats)
Maintain a credible deterrent against bad actors
Recognize the likelihood of crises emerging beyond the Iraq and Afghanistan-Pakistan conflicts that currently preoccupy the U.S.
Fight the temptation to turn inward at home and abroad

About the Author

David Rothkopf

Former Visiting Scholar

David Rothkopf was a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment as well as the former CEO and editor in chief of the FP Group.

Recent Work

In The Media
How Bush, Obama, and Trump Ended Pax Americana
- David Rothkopf
In The Media
A Bigger Clubhouse
- David Rothkopf

Security Military Economy Foreign Policy North America United States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Report
Implementing the Biden Administration’s China Strategy
At the heart of Biden’s approach to China was the consolidation of a framework for strategic competition with an eye toward coexistence.
Christopher S. Chivvis, Senkai Hsia
Article
What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?
India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.
Konark Bhandari
Commentary
Emissary
The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even Murkier
The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.
Eric Lob
Commentary
Emissary
How the Hormuz Closure Is Testing the Korean President’s Progressive Agenda
The crisis is not just a story of energy vulnerability. It’s also a complex, high-stakes political challenge.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares
Commentary
Diwan
What Does the Strait of Hormuz’s Closure Mean?
In an interview, Roger Diwan discusses where the global economy may be going in the third week of the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran.
Nur Arafeh

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Report

Implementing the Biden Administration’s China Strategy

At the heart of Biden’s approach to China was the consolidation of a framework for strategic competition with an eye toward coexistence.

Christopher S. Chivvis, Senkai Hsia

Article

What Could a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement Do for U.S.-India Ties?

India and the United States are close to concluding a Reciprocal Defense Procurement Agreement (RDPA) that will allow firms from the two countries to sell to each other’s defense establishments more easily. While this may not remedy the specific grievances both sides may have regarding larger bilateral issues, an RDPA could restore some momentum, following the trade deal announcement.