Critical Crossroad: Advancing Global Opportunities to Transform Transportation

{
  "authors": [
    "Deborah Gordon",
    "Daniel Sperling"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SCP",
  "programs": [
    "Sustainability, Climate, and Geopolitics"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Carnegie Oil Initiative"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States",
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Western Europe"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

In The Media

Critical Crossroad: Advancing Global Opportunities to Transform Transportation

Emerging countries must decide if they want to follow developed, auto-dependent nations down an unsustainable path or if they will instead transform their national transportation system to encourage environmentally and economically sound choices.

By Deborah Gordon and Daniel Sperling

Published on Oct 20, 2011

Source: European Financial Review

Critical Crossroad: Advancing Global OpportunitiesThe world is rapidly motorizing. At the start of the twenty-first century, some one billion vehicles occupied the roads. But this number will likely double in the next decade. By mid-century the Earth could be home to billions more cars, trucks, and motorized two-wheelers, which will collectively have profound effects on global oil demands, energy security, climate stability, and urban mobility.

We are at a critical crossroad. The global proliferation of vehicles presents many risks and opportunities. One seemingly easy way forward is to adopt last-century approaches that seek to accommodate the high demand for vehicles through cheap oil, free roads, sprawled development, and subsidized home ownership. A preferred alternative course beckons, however, one that promises new, low-carbon, location-efficient, economically productive mobility. Government, industry, and consumers—especially in emerging economies—can reinvent transportation models and employ innovative solutions to avoid a foreboding car monoculture.

About the Authors

Deborah Gordon

Former Director and Senior Fellow, Energy and Climate Program

Gordon was director of Carnegie’s Energy and Climate Program, where her research focuses on oil and climate change issues in North America and globally.

Daniel Sperling

Former Visiting Scholar , Energy and Climate Program

Sperling was a visiting scholar in the Energy and Climate Program at the Carnegie Endowment. He is professor of civil engineering and environmental science and policy at the University of California, Davis. He is also founding director of the university’s Institute of Transportation Studies.

Economy Climate Change North America United States South Asia India East Asia China Western Europe

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Emissary
Can Mullin Revive FEMA?
Restoring competence and trust to the anemic, neglected disaster recovery agency is a matter of national security.
Sarah Labowitz, Debbra Goh
Commentary
Emissary
Europe’s New Industrial Policy Can Learn From U.S. Mistakes
Although the IAA often differs from the IRA, European policymakers can still take note of the U.S. act’s shortcomings.
Milo McBride
Article
Gen Z Protests Across Asia Offer a Delicate but Renewed Democratic Order
A disconnect between Gen Z citizenry and older rulers has fueled massive demonstrations. What are the key issues and how is protest energy translating into electoral change?
Usama Khilji
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market
The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.
Alexandra Prokopenko
Commentary
Emissary
The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack Iran
Going to war was the U.S. president’s decision, for which he alone is responsible.
Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Mullin with his hand raised, taking an oath

Commentary

Emissary

Can Mullin Revive FEMA?

Restoring competence and trust to the anemic, neglected disaster recovery agency is a matter of national security.

Sarah Labowitz, Debbra Goh

Worker pushing machinery toward a car frame

Commentary

Emissary

Europe’s New Industrial Policy Can Learn From U.S. Mistakes

Although the IAA often differs from the IRA, European policymakers can still take note of the U.S. act’s shortcomings.

Milo McBride

Gen Z United activists hold a demonstration in Kathmandu, Nepal, on September 8 and 9, 2025, under the banner ''Don't Forget the Blood of Martyrs,'' honoring protest martyrs and demanding justice and accountability for those killed during past movements.

Article

Gen Z Protests Across Asia Offer a Delicate but Renewed Democratic Order

A disconnect between Gen Z citizenry and older rulers has fueled massive demonstrations. What are the key issues and how is protest energy translating into electoral change?

Usama Khilji

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer Market

The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.

Alexandra Prokopenko

Commentary

Emissary

The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack Iran

Going to war was the U.S. president’s decision, for which he alone is responsible.

Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller