• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "United States",
    "North America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Climate Change",
    "Security"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

The Future: 10 Questions

Today’s emergencies should not distract policy makers from thinking about the long-term challenges that will define the world—for the better or the worse—in the coming century.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on Oct 30, 2011

Source: El Pais

The Future: 10 QuestionsToday's emergencies are crowding the thinking about the long-term. The anxiety over Europe's economic crisis, the political infighting in the United States, social unrest in many other countries, and a possible slowdown of growth in China, are just some of the concerns about the immediate future that are preventing us from thinking beyond the coming weeks or months. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the think tank where I work, has just celebrated its 100th anniversary. Spurred on by the centenary, we are considering the dilemmas that will define the world in the coming century. Many will quickly dismiss such an exercise. Why bother? It is not very likely that the answers will turn out to be true and, in any case, we will not be around to see if we got it wrong - or to deal with the consequences. Yet, these are questions that stimulate interesting ideas and synthesize our options in a number of critical areas. Just thinking about alternative futures and the factors that will shape them helps us better understand where we are, where we might be heading, and which efforts are needed to take us closer to the more desirable scenarios.

These are, then, 10 questions about the future, which I present in no particular order of importance, and, in several cases, are clearly linked.

1. Will we be able to limit the increase in global temperature to 3ºC, or will it rise a further 8ºC or more? If the increase reaches or passes 8ºC, the planet and its inhabitants will be facing unprecedented challenges.

2. Will there be 16 billion inhabitants or will there be just six billion of us living on planet Earth? This is the range of possibilities that the United Nations estimates with respect to the size of the global population in 2100, depending on fertility indices and other factors.

3. How many countries will have nuclear weapons by 2100? None? Twenty-five? This is the number of countries that experts reckon could have atomic bombs in the coming decades if they continue to develop their nuclear programs in this direction and if the rest of the world lets them. Today there are nine "nuclear weapons" countries.

4. What will be the model of government in the future: democracies as in Europe, the United States, India and Brazil, or authoritarian regimes such as those in China and Russia?

5. Will the rapid expansion of the middle class that we have seen over the last decade in the poorest and most-populated countries continue? Or will deep inequality be the norm?

6. Will Islam become the source of tension and conflict, or will it renovate, transforming itself into a force for peace and development?

7. Will the internet and cyberspace evolve as benign forces or will they be a source of new threats?

8. One of the characteristics of the 20th century was the creation of many new nations. Will state-failure be the defining characteristic of the 21st century?

9. Will globalization continue, driven by technologies that shorten distances and communication costs, and by public policies that encourage international integration? Or on the contrary, will social unrest produced by globalization feed nationalism and protectionism, blocking the movement of people, products, money, and ideas?

10. Will economic, political, military and social power be more or less concentrated?

It is obvious that this list of factors that will define the future is incomplete. Many are missing, and we can all think of other challenges we will face. But these 10 should probably be included on any list. At the very least they should serve to begin an indispensible conversation; one that is more urgent than we might like to think.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
EconomyClimate ChangeSecurityUnited StatesNorth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Xi walking into a room with people standing and applauding around him
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Xi Doctrine Zeros in on “High-Quality Development” for China’s Economic Future

    In the latest Five-Year Plan, the Chinese president cements the shift to an innovation-driven economy over a consumption-driven one.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

  • apan's 8,900-ton Maritime Self-Defense Force supply ship Oosumi leaves Muroran port escorted by the 4,550-ton destroyer Murasame bound for Kuwait February 20, 2004 in Muroran, Japan.
    Article
    Japan’s Security Policy Is Still Caught Between the Alliance and Domestic Reality

    Japan’s response to U.S. pressure over Hormuz highlights a broader dilemma: How to preserve the alliance while remaining bound by legal limits, public opinion, and an Asia-centered security agenda. Tokyo gained diplomatic space through an alliance-embracing strategy, but only under conditions that may not endure.

      • Ryo Sahashi

      Ryo Sahashi

  • Article
    Kenya’s Health Deal Is a Stress Test for the America First Global Health Strategy

    U.S. agreements must contend with national data protection laws to make durable foreign policy instruments.

      • A Black woman with long hair wears a black blazer

      Jane Munga, Rose Mosero

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Trump’s Plan for Gaza Is Not Irrelevant. It’s Worse.

    The simple conclusion is that the scheme will bring neither peace nor prosperity, but will institutionalize devastation.

      Nathan J. Brown

  • Trump seated and gesturing while speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Iran War Is Making America Less Safe

    A conflict launched in the name of American security is producing the opposite effect.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.