Commentary
Michael Pettis
{
"authors": [
"Michael Pettis"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
Chinese Euro Intervention
Europe can solve its own domestic liquidity issues and it is unreasonable to expect China to resolve European solvency problems.
Published on Dec 1, 2011
What are the prospects of a major Chinese intervention in the euro?
For at least the past one or two years, China has been slowly shifting the composition of its reserve accumulation, with euros likely growing as a share of new reserves. But this doesn't mean we should expect a major Chinese intervention in the euro, especially if by intervention we mean that China will provide money in a way that relieves pressure on the inability of peripheral European countries to borrow.
There is already a great deal of domestic concern about the safety of China's reserve accumulation, and the idea that China is bailing out risky European borrowers, when China has such huge domestic problems, is not likely to be popular at home.
There is already a great deal of domestic concern about the safety of China's reserve accumulation, and the idea that China is bailing out risky European borrowers, when China has such huge domestic problems, is not likely to be popular at home.
Read more
At best, I would expect that China will participate in international programs in which the credit risk is not limited to the peripheral European borrowers. For example, China may provide more funding to the International Monetary Fund that can then provide financing facilities to European sovereign borrowers.
Will this help Europe? Almost certainly not. Foreign capital inflows come with exported demand and slower domestic growth. Europe can solve its own domestic liquidity problems, and it is unreasonable to expect foreigners to resolve European solvency problems. Turning to foreigners for capital is not a strategy so much as an indication of total confusion.
Will this help Europe? Almost certainly not. Foreign capital inflows come with exported demand and slower domestic growth. Europe can solve its own domestic liquidity problems, and it is unreasonable to expect foreigners to resolve European solvency problems. Turning to foreigners for capital is not a strategy so much as an indication of total confusion.
About the Author
Michael Pettis
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets.
- What GDP Means in a Soft Budget Economy Like China
- What’s New about Involution?Commentary
Michael Pettis
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The U.S. Export-Import Bank Was Built for a Different Era. Here's How to Fix It.Commentary
Five problems—and solutions—to make it actually work as a tool of great power competition.
Afreen Akhter
- Leveraging Internal Security Cooperation with Vietnam Offers a Glimpse of Future Chinese Diplomacy with Southeast AsiaArticle
Despite long-standing differences, China and Vietnam are reinforcing common ground for collaboration, especially in public security. This internal security–centered diplomacy offers a strengthened road map for how China moves forward with Southeast Asia.
Sophie Zhuang
- The Iran War’s Global ReachCollection
As the war between the United States, Israel, and Iran continues, Carnegie scholars contribute cutting-edge analysis on the events of the war and their wide-reaching implications. From the impact on Iran and its immediate neighbors to the responses from Gulf states to fuel and fertilizer shortages caused by the effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, the war is reshaping Middle East alliances and creating shockwaves around the world. Carnegie experts analyze it all.
- Digital Hegemony and the Reification of Taiwan’s “Unification-Independence” DichotomyArticle
Governments now deploy online platforms to shape public opinion and influence collective cognition. This is acutely apparent between China and Taiwan.
Frank Cheng-Shan Liu
- China’s Energy Security Doesn’t Run Through Hormuz but Through the Electrification of EverythingCommentary
Across Asia, China is better positioned to withstand energy shocks from the fallout of the Iran war. Its abundant coal capacity can ensure stability in the near term. Yet at the same time, the country’s energy transition away from coal will make it even less vulnerable during the next shock.
Damien Ma
