Commentary
Michael Pettis
{
"authors": [
"Michael Pettis"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"East Asia",
"China",
"Western Europe"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
Chinese Euro Intervention
Europe can solve its own domestic liquidity issues and it is unreasonable to expect China to resolve European solvency problems.
Published on Dec 1, 2011
What are the prospects of a major Chinese intervention in the euro?
For at least the past one or two years, China has been slowly shifting the composition of its reserve accumulation, with euros likely growing as a share of new reserves. But this doesn't mean we should expect a major Chinese intervention in the euro, especially if by intervention we mean that China will provide money in a way that relieves pressure on the inability of peripheral European countries to borrow.
There is already a great deal of domestic concern about the safety of China's reserve accumulation, and the idea that China is bailing out risky European borrowers, when China has such huge domestic problems, is not likely to be popular at home.
There is already a great deal of domestic concern about the safety of China's reserve accumulation, and the idea that China is bailing out risky European borrowers, when China has such huge domestic problems, is not likely to be popular at home.
Read more
At best, I would expect that China will participate in international programs in which the credit risk is not limited to the peripheral European borrowers. For example, China may provide more funding to the International Monetary Fund that can then provide financing facilities to European sovereign borrowers.
Will this help Europe? Almost certainly not. Foreign capital inflows come with exported demand and slower domestic growth. Europe can solve its own domestic liquidity problems, and it is unreasonable to expect foreigners to resolve European solvency problems. Turning to foreigners for capital is not a strategy so much as an indication of total confusion.
Will this help Europe? Almost certainly not. Foreign capital inflows come with exported demand and slower domestic growth. Europe can solve its own domestic liquidity problems, and it is unreasonable to expect foreigners to resolve European solvency problems. Turning to foreigners for capital is not a strategy so much as an indication of total confusion.
About the Author
Michael Pettis
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie China
Michael Pettis is a nonresident senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. An expert on China’s economy, Pettis is professor of finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, where he specializes in Chinese financial markets.
- Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?
- What GDP Means in a Soft Budget Economy Like ChinaCommentary
Michael Pettis
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?Commentary
China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.
Michael Pettis
- The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead EndCommentary
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi
- India’s Press Note 3 Gamble: Opening the FDI Door to ChinaArticle
On March 10, 2026, India’s Union Cabinet approved amendments to Press Note 3, a regulation that mandated government approval on all foreign direct investment (FDI) from countries sharing a land border with India. This amendment raises questions primarily about whether its stated benefits will materialize and if the risks have been adequately weighed. This piece will address the same.
Konark Bhandari
- What Does Nuclear Proliferation in East Asia Mean for Russia?Commentary
Troubled by the growing salience of nuclear debates in East Asia, Moscow has responded in its usual way: with condemnation and threats. But by exacerbating insecurity, Russia is forcing South Korea and Japan to consider radical security options.
James D.J. Brown
- Why Vietnam Is Swinging in China’s DirectionCommentary
Hanoi and Beijing have long treated each other as distant cousins rather than comrades in arms. That might be changing as both sides draw closer to hedge against uncertainty and America’s erratic behavior.
Nguyễn Khắc Giang
