- +3
Frederic Wehrey, Nathan J. Brown, Bader Al-Saif, …
{
"authors": [
"Anouar Boukhars"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Mali"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Military"
]
}Source: Getty
The Mali Conflict: Avoiding Past Mistakes
French military gains in northern Mali will be fruitless unless they are included in a comprehensive strategy that addresses the root causes of the conflict.
Source: FRIDE
When radical Islamists launched an offensive against the south of Mali, France had no choice but to intervene militarily. The success of the campaign, however, depends on a sound understanding of the complex dynamics of Mali’s internal conflict and fragility. To view the turmoil through the lens of Islamic radicalization only is a dangerous oversimplification. Equally misguided is the common characterization of the problem as a simple North-South dispute. Such confusion imperils strategic practice and detracts attention from the essential set of tensions that makes the conflict self-reinforcing. The causal factors are as diverse as the motivations of the competing tribal and ethnic actors and organizations that sustain instability.
Thus, the French military gains in northern Mali will be fruitless unless they are included in a comprehensive strategy that addresses the root causes of the conflict: weak and corrupt state institutions, ethnic tensions, and competition over scarce resources. In the short term, the international community’s immediate priority should be to provide urgent humanitarian relief and push for political dialogue and military reform. Promoting extensive consultations with all stakeholders and stabilizing civil-military relations are crucial to reconciliation and recovery.
The full text of this policy brief is available on the FRIDE website.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Fellow, Middle East Program
Boukhars was a nonresident fellow in Carnegie’s Middle East Program. He is a professor of countering violent extremism and counter-terrorism at the Africa Center for Strategic Studies, National Defense University.
- Islamic Authority and Arab States in a Time of PandemicArticle
- A Different Type of AllianceCommentary
Anouar Boukhars
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Taking the Pulse: Is France’s New Nuclear Doctrine Ambitious Enough?Commentary
French President Emmanuel Macron has unveiled his country’s new nuclear doctrine. Are the changes he has made enough to reassure France’s European partners in the current geopolitical context?
Rym Momtaz, ed.
- The Iran War’s Dangerous Fallout for EuropeCommentary
The drone strike on the British air base in Akrotiri brings Europe’s proximity to the conflict in Iran into sharp relief. In the fog of war, old tensions in the Eastern Mediterranean risk being reignited, and regional stakeholders must avoid escalation.
Marc Pierini
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- Why Are China and Russia Not Rushing to Help Iran?Commentary
Most of Moscow’s military resources are tied up in Ukraine, while Beijing’s foreign policy prioritizes economic ties and avoids direct conflict.
Alexander Gabuev, Temur Umarov
- Turkey Has Two Key Interests in the Iran ConflictCommentary
But to achieve either, it needs to retain Washington’s ear.
Alper Coşkun