• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Jan Techau"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Asia",
    "Europe",
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Western Europe",
    "Germany"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy",
    "EU",
    "Economy",
    "Trade"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other
Carnegie Europe

China Looks for Answers Within Heart of Europe’s Common Power

Germans and Europeans at large are in a very similar economic situation to the Chinese in many ways.

Link Copied
By Jan Techau
Published on May 26, 2013

Source: Global Times

China sees Germany as having a strong dominating role and as the key power in Europe. It sees Germany as the country with which China has the strongest trade relationship in Europe.

China has for a long time dealt with Europe primarily though the member states, not so much through Brussels. When it looks at the member states and it has to pick only one, it picks Germany.

Trade concerns are by far the biggest concerns in the Sin0-German relationship. China is very smart in realizing that Germany is not a geopolitical player plays a big role in the Middle East or the Eastern Europe, or in Asia or in Africa. But it's a player in its development agenda.

In fact, China is looking at Europe as a whole, not so much as a geostrategic player. The Chinese don't see Europe as a power that is a global power in its power projection reach, they see Europe primarily as an economic force, a financial force and trade force.

This is why the economic relationship is by far the most dominant. So the geopolitical interests of Europe are much smaller than the trade influence.

However, there are risks there with the bilateral relationship getting increasingly close, especially in the trade field.

Trade policies in Europe are truly communalized policy, which means individual countries don't have trade policies anymore. The trade policies are negotiated by the EU for all its member states.

However, when it comes to foreign direct investments and specific kinds of investments agreements, individual countries could still cultivate their relationship with China.

Germany is in a good position because it's such a strong exporter. That Germany feels strong enough to try to impose some of its own interests on Europe creates frictions on the European side.

Germans and the Europeans at large are in a very similar situation to the Chinese in many ways. Both Chinese and Europeans rely on a global system that we don't ourselves guarantee. We are not the ones who keep it in place. Somebody else does that, and it's the US for the most part.

But as the US is getting weaker, both the Chinese and Europeans are asked to become pillars of the system. We are both facing a strategic dilemma. Both China and Europe need to become stronger stakeholder, but at the same time, both are tied down by domestic constraints.

Currently, the European crisis makes many European countries focus on how to survive. Both leaderships are very much inward looking, but there is a strong demand in the outside to become more globalized, not only economically but politically.

This article was originally published in the Global Times.

About the Author

Jan Techau

Director, Europe Team, Eurasia Group

Techau is director with Eurasia Group's Europe team, covering Germany and European security from Berlin. Previously, he was director of Carnegie Europe.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Can Europe Trust the United States Again?

      Nathalie Tocci, Jan Techau

  • Commentary
    Pre-Reformation Europe and the Coming Schism

      Jan Techau

Jan Techau
Director, Europe Team, Eurasia Group
Jan Techau
Foreign PolicyEUEconomyTradeAsiaEuropeEast AsiaChinaWestern EuropeGermany

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • China Financial Markets
    Commentary
    China Financial Markets
    Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?

    China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.

      Michael Pettis

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead End

    For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.

      Friedrich Conradi

  • Article
    The Iran War Shows the Limits of U.S. Power

    If Washington cannot adapt to the ongoing transformations of a multipolar world, its superiority will become a liability.

      Amr Hamzawy

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    The EU Equivocating on Turkey Is Bad Geopolitics

    Following Ursula von der Leyen’s gaffe equating Turkey to Russia and China, relations with Ankara risk deteriorating even further. Without better, more consistent diplomatic messaging, how can the EU pretend to be a geopolitical power?

      Sinan Ülgen

  • Article
    India’s Press Note 3 Gamble: Opening the FDI Door to China

    On March 10, 2026, India’s Union Cabinet approved amendments to Press Note 3, a regulation that mandated government approval on all foreign direct investment (FDI) from countries sharing a land border with India. This amendment raises questions primarily about whether its stated benefits will materialize and if the risks have been adequately weighed. This piece will address the same.

      Konark Bhandari

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.