Commentary
Nathan J. Brown
{
"authors": [
"Nathan J. Brown"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Egypt"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
In The Media
Egyptians Poised To Vote On Controversial New Constitution
The big winners of Egypt’s constitutional draft are the very institutions that overturned the Morsi government.
Published on Dec 6, 2013
Source: NPR All Things Considered
Egyptians are preparing to vote on a new constitution. A year earlier, they voted on a constitution backed by the Muslim Brotherhood, drafted under former president Mohammed Morsi. Speaking to NPR’s All Things Considered, Carnegie’s Nathan Brown said the big winners of the constitutional draft are the very institutions that overturned the Morsi government. Brown listed these institutions as the military, the security apparatus, the judiciary (to some extent), and other parts of the state structure like the religious establishment.
“All these institutions, essentially, got guarantees that they would be insulated from civilian politics,” he argued. While these institutions see themselves as being responsible for the entire Egyptian nation, they don’t want to be held accountable to the day-to-day politics, so they are beyond any mechanisms of democratic accountability in this constitution, Brown contended. A number of clauses in the constitutional draft defer their main subject to ordinary legislation, he said. “We won’t know what this constitution means fully until we have a parliament that’s sitting down and writing laws to implement these provisions,” Brown concluded.
About the Author
Nathan J. Brown
Nonresident Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Nathan J. Brown, a professor of political science and international affairs at George Washington University, is a distinguished scholar and author of nine books on Arab politics and governance, as well as editor of five books.
- Trump’s Plan for Gaza Is Not Irrelevant. It’s Worse.
- Israel’s Forever WarsCommentary
Nathan J. Brown
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- How to Join the EU in Three Easy StepsCommentary
Montenegro and Albania are frontrunners for EU enlargement in the Western Balkans, but they can’t just sit back and wait. To meet their 2030 accession ambitions, they must make a strong positive case.
Dimitar Bechev, Iliriana Gjoni
- Climate Change, Gender, and Inequality in Morocco’s Souss-Massa RegionArticle
For Morocco, integrating gender into climate governance is not simply a matter of social justice. It is a strategic imperative for effective adaptation.
Fadwa Rajoauni
- The Myriad Problems With the Iran CeasefireCommentary
Four Middle East experts analyze the region’s reactions and next steps.
- +1
Amr Hamzawy, Andrew Leber, Eric Lob, …
- Amid Iran War, Gulf Countries Slow the Pace of ReformsArticle
The return of war as the organizing factor in Middle Eastern politics has predictable consequences: governments are prioritizing regime stability and becoming averse to political and social reform.
Sarah Yerkes, Amr Hamzawy
- Africa’s Digital Infrastructure ImperativeArticle
The Africa Technology Policy Tracker reveals policymakers’ priorities for the continent’s digital transformation.
Jane Munga
