Commentary
Dmitri Trenin
{
"authors": [
"Dmitri Trenin"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"Russia",
"Eastern Europe",
"Ukraine",
"Western Europe",
"Germany"
],
"topics": [
"Security",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Commentary
Europe: The “Holiday From History” Is Over
The continuing crisis over Ukraine has significantly hardened Western official and media attitudes toward Russia. However, with Washington leading the charge and NATO back in the saddle, the European Union is taking a back seat.
Published on Mar 31, 2014
From my time in Europe last week, I have somewhat contradictory feelings. On the one hand, the continuing crisis over Ukraine has significantly hardened official and media attitudes toward Russia. In Eastern Europe, Russia is once again cast in the role of an historical adversary, and in much of the rest of the continent, it is painted as a 19th century power. On the other hand, regarding the issue of economic sanctions against Russia, there is a general lack of enthusiasm. Europeans are worried about the level of their energy dependency on their eastern neighbor, and they are highly reluctant to give up their export market in Russia—especially now, when the post-crisis recovery is far from complete.
President Barack Obama's recent rhetoric in Brussels was electrifying. NATO is rediscovering its old mission of "keeping the Russians out." Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who began his career as the alliance's secretary-general in 2009 with a bold outreach to Moscow, now talks about the unfinished business of NATO's enlargement to the east. In principle, this may mean Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. With former Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg about to succeed Rasmussen this fall, the debate in Sweden about joining NATO has become livelier. Finland is not unaffected, but it is still holding out—for now. When the alliance holds its next summit in September, it may decide to redeploy its forces farther to the east—to the eastern borders of Poland, Romania and the Baltic States.
At the same time, with the centenary of World War I on many people's minds, and Christopher Clark's 2012 book Sleepwalkers, a modern version of Barbara Tuchman's Guns of August, on many bestseller lists (also in its German translation), fears of a hot war underlie the talk about the new cold one. The scare last week about Russian forces purportedly poised to invade eastern Ukraine made quite a few Europeans nervous. The public is generally confused about Ukraine, a place almost indistinguishable in historical memory from Russia. There seems to be a consensus that whatever happens in Ukraine does not warrant Western military action.
With Washington leading the charge and NATO back in the saddle, the European Union is taking a back seat. Germany, its sole powerhouse, publicly supports U.S. rhetoric but is very cautious, so that the situation does not lead to an economic rupture with Russia. It is no wonder that Chancellor Angela Merkel, who has said that Vladimir Putin "lives in another world," has failed to become the Russian president's main interlocutor on Ukraine. The Kremlin has turned to the White House instead. Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Germany's social democratic foreign minister and a moderate on Russia, finds himself between the hammer of Moscow's resolve and the anvil of his own domestic critics. Again, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov speaks mainly with U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry. The influential Eastern Committee of German Industry wants to protect the interests of 6,000-plus German companies which are doing business in Russia. Remarkably, Helmut Schmidt, Germany's 95-year-old elder statesman, in a wide-ranging interview with Die Zeit, said he "understood" Putin's motives on Crimea and, if he were to vote on Russia's behavior, would "abstain." For better or worse, Europe is not only back on Washington's radar screen, but also back in history. And history demands leadership.
About the Author
Dmitri Trenin
Former Director, Carnegie Moscow Center
Trenin was director of the Carnegie Moscow Center from 2008 to early 2022.
- Mapping Russia’s New Approach to the Post-Soviet Space
- What a Week of Talks Between Russia and the West RevealedCommentary
Dmitri Trenin
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Unintended Consequences of German DeterrenceResearch
Germany's sometimes ambiguous nuclear policy advocates nuclear weapons for deterrence purposes but at the same time adheres to non-proliferation. This dichotomy can turn into a formidable dilemma and increase proliferation pressures in Berlin once no nuclear protector is around anymore, a scenario that has become more realistic in recent years.
Ulrich Kühn
- The U.S. Risks Much, but Gains Little, with IranCommentary
In an interview, Hassan Mneimneh discusses the ongoing conflict and the myriad miscalculations characterizing it.
Michael Young
- India’s Foreign Policy in the Age of PopulismPaper
Domestic mobilization, personalized leadership, and nationalism have reshaped India’s global behavior.
Sandra Destradi
- The Greatest Dangers May Lie AheadCommentary
In an interview, Nicole Grajewski discusses the military dimension of the U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran.
Michael Young
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
