Imagine that the United Kingdom chose to celebrate the day it lost the American colonies, or the day it gave up Ireland or India. Or what if Turkey decided to celebrate the breakup of the Ottoman Empire, or France decided to celebrate the decolonization of Algeria? Bizarre? Schizophrenic? Absolutely.

This is why it’s so strange that on June 12 Russia tries to celebrate its sovereignty without raising the uncomfortable question: sovereignty from whom, the Soviet Union, its former colonies (the Baltics, Central Asia, the South Caucasus states, and Ukraine)? But the Soviet Union was Russia, albeit under a different name. The oddity with this anniversary in Russia is that, despite its celebrating Russian independence from the rest of the Soviet Union, the Kremlin today is trying to reembrace the “leftovers.” The very idea of the “Eurasian Union” is an attempt at such “reembracing”. This makes the Russian Independence celebration a truly singular event.

Indeed, there are hundreds of historical paradoxes, inconsistencies, and historical myths. But the problem with Russia’s Independence Day celebration is that it has become the first link in a chain of mystifications that have tied up Russia in one big Gordian knot! Let me mention only a few of these chain links.

Russia’s declaration of independence and the dissolution of the Soviet Union, in reality, helped the Russian system of personalized power to survive in a new incarnation, with Boris Yeltsin as its embodiment. Usually, the collapse of an old state aids in the process of establishing both a new regime and a new rule. In the Russian case, it went the other way. As for the declaration of sovereignty, that was mainly intended by the Russian political elite as a means of getting rid of Mikhail Gorbachev and taking over control of the Soviet resources and instruments of power.

Here’s another link in the chain: Russian independence helped to freeze the leftovers of the Soviet empire into the new form of the Russian Federation. The current Russian state is not a nation state, nor is it a true empire. Rather it is something vague and amorphous—a swamp of old habits, obsolete moods, and a mentality stuck in an interstitial civilizational space. This ungainly construct can only survive by constantly returning to the past. This is what Putin is now doing by cracking down on civil society in order to prolong the Russian Matrix—that is, personalized power, a mix of power with property, and superpower ambition. Indeed, I wouldn’t put all responsibility for this on Putin; he, too, is a hostage of the system that he created.

Disguising the continuity between the Soviet past and the new regime as a revolution gave birth to the treacherous “new” Russia—a place where liberals serve the personalized ruler, where “reforms” help to monopolize power and property, where “democracy” camouflages authoritarianism, and where cooperation with the West alternates with an anti-Western consolidation of the society, as circumstances dictate. The Post- Crimea Russia that has dismantled the post–Cold war settlement, returning back to the Soviet and pre-Soviet rules of the game, makes the Russian Independence Day a true historical paradox!