• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Thomas de Waal"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Europe",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "Caucasus",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Europe

Khajimba’s Challenges

Raul Khajimba has attained the position of Abkhazian president at the fourth attempt, but he knows it's a far from enviable job.

Link Copied
By Thomas de Waal
Published on Aug 27, 2014

Who would want to be president of Abkhazia? Raul Khajimba has attained that position at the fourth attempt, but he knows it's a far from enviable job.

Declared the victor in the first round of the election of August 24 by the slenderest of argins—50.57 percent of the vote—Khajimba received basically only one telegram of congratulation, from Russian president Vladimir Putin. Interestingly, the telegram was timed before even the official Abkhaz news agency Apsny Press announced the result.

The European Union and United States duly followed the lead of Tbilisi, as they have done in previous Abkhaz elections and declared the ballot illegitimate. That means Khajimba will effectively be under a travel ban to Western countries. It also lessens the leverage of those countries in Abkhazia. (It would surely be better to go half-way and acknowledge the election of the leader of the “Abkhaz community” as they do with the Turkish leader of northern Cyprus).

Not that Russia, the only major country to recognize Abkhazia as independent, is so easy to deal with either. For Moscow, Abkhazia is less enthusiastic than Crimea and less accommodating than South Ossetia, where there is now talk of merging customs posts.

The fairly long list of issues that divides the two governments was spelled out in a revealing interview to Radio Liberty by the Russian ambassador in Abkhazia. In return for the millions it has invested in Abkhazia, Moscow wants to see Russians given the right to acquire property there and it will expect Khajimba to be a more compliant leader than his predecessors. But the Abkhaz elite fears that this would be the beginning of the end of its economic control over its own republic.

In domestic politics, Khajimba will have to balance the claims of the elite, who are preoccupied with issues like this one, and the claims of ordinary people, who want to see the economy improve and are disappointed that recognition by Russia has not delivered them more tangible benefits, such as the re-opening of Sukhumi airport.

The population data this election provided shows how weak and damaged Abkhazia still is, 20 years after the end of the war with Tbilisi. Almost exactly 100,000 people voted, which is about the same number as in the past two elections. Even though this omits the Georgian-majority Gali region (which voted the last two times but not on this occasion) it still suggests that the overall population of Abkhazia cannot be much more than 200,000.

This small number compares to a 1989 census tally of 525,000, of whom 240,000 were Georgians. In other words, Abkhazia is not just missing most of its Georgian population who were forced to flee in 1992-3, but still has a smaller non-Georgian population (of Abkhaz, Armenians, Russians and others) than it did in 1989.

Khajimba comes across as a modest man, more consensual than his rather autocratic predecessor Alexander Ankvab, who was forced from office in May. He has already spoken of the need for national unity and will probably try to form a coalition government.

But he cannot avoid another volatile issue, that of the Georgians of Gali region, almost none of whom voted in the election—and whose non-participation helped ensure Khajimba's victory in a first round. The campaign against the right of these people, who cross back and forth into western Georgia, to hold Abkhaz passports was one that Khajimba used to challenge Ankvab.

Now that he is elected leader of Abkhazia, Khajimba will have to decide whether to continue to appeal to his "base" (to use American terminology) and risk a confrontation or to try and appeal to the disaffected Gali Georgians.

All this would be a daunting to-do list even if Khajimba had the benefit of having his election recognized by the world at large.

About the Author

Thomas de Waal

Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe

Thomas de Waal is a senior fellow at Carnegie Europe, specializing in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia

      Thomas de Waal

  • Article
    Rewiring the South Caucasus: TRIPP and the New Geopolitics of Connectivity
      • Areg Kochinyan

      Thomas de Waal, Areg Kochinyan, Zaur Shiriyev

Thomas de Waal
Senior Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Thomas de Waal
Political ReformCaucasusRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Does Azerbaijan Want to See Win Armenia’s Elections?

    By fueling the arguments of both supporters and opponents of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Azerbaijan wants to ensure he is re-elected with a weaker mandate.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse

    A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.  

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Article
    Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026

    This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is Belarus Really Set to Return to the Ukraine War?

    By reminding the world that Lukashenko is a threat to NATO and Ukraine, Kyiv is trying to return the focus to why the Belarusian regime needs to be contained rather than rewarded.

      Artyom Shraibman

  • Pashinyan shaking hands
    Commentary
    Emissary
    At Stake in Armenia’s Election: Peace and Russian Influence

    Regardless of the outcome, there’s another path to ensuring that progress doesn’t stall.

      Zaur Shiriyev

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.