• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Petr Topychkanov"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Technology"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Commentary
Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Indian Cyber Front

Over the past few years, India has been paying increasing attention to the threats of crime, terrorism, and espionage in cyberspace.

Link Copied
By Petr Topychkanov
Published on Feb 2, 2015

Over the past few years, India has been paying increasing attention to the threats of crime, terrorism, and espionage in cyberspace.

At the end of November 2014, India’s Communications and IT Minister, Ravi Shankar Prasad, cited official statistics that showed tens of thousands of cyber security breaches in recent years, including incidents of phishing, scanning, spam, malicious code, and website intrusions.

There is no question that India faces a significant cyberspace threat and that the number of cyber-attacks on Indian government structures is on the rise. The telecommunication and banking industries are also under threat. Ordinary Internet and mobile phone users frequently fall victim to these attacks. According to Kaspersky Lab, 7.9 percent of attacks on mobile devices in the world occurred in India, which made the country second only to Russia by number of such attacks.

In alphabetical order, Algeria, Bangladesh, Brazil, China, the European Union, Pakistan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and the United States topped the list of the states whose territories were used to launch cyber-attacks against India. Hacker groups with ties to governments and/or radical and terrorist organizations and organized crime figure prominently among the attackers.

India officially recognizes the poor state of its offensive and defensive cyber technologies. Apart from breaches of security protocol and inadequate monitoring and defense, India’s vulnerability in cyberspace stems from the import and use of foreign software and telecommunication equipment.

For instance, in 2009, the National Technical Research Organization purchased encryption devices for the Indian Air Force from the India-based Bharat Electronics Ltd, but it was subsequently discovered that the devices were made in China.

India is reacting to the spike in cybercrime. A total of 1,791, 2,876 and 4,356 cybercrime cases were registered under the Information Technology Act in 2011, 2012 and 2013. Some of these were classified under the cybercrime-related sections of the Indian Penal Code: a total of 422 (23.6 percent of all cases), 601 (20.9 percent) and 1,337 cases (30.7 percent) in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. However, only 1 percent of those charged were convicted, which points to flaws in Indian law, as well as to the country’s limited law enforcement capabilities in the sphere of cybercrime.

The growing cyber threat should force India to take more active steps toward developing both offensive and defensive technologies in cyberspace. The state also needs to increase coordination between its agencies and develop a roadmap for guaranteeing cyberspace security. In the absence of a single strategy, about a dozen Indian agencies often find themselves out of sync with one another, which lowers the effectiveness of the steps they take, especially in light of the limited resources (7.8 million dollars in 2013) committed to their fight against cyber threats.

About the Author

Petr Topychkanov

Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center

Topychkanov was a fellow in the Carnegie Moscow Center’s Nonproliferation Program.

    Recent Work

  • Report
    Entanglement: Chinese and Russian Perspectives on Non-nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Risks
      • +3

      James M. Acton, Alexey Arbatov, Vladimir Dvorkin, …

  • In The Media
    Iranian and Russian Perspectives on the Global System

      Petr Topychkanov

Petr Topychkanov
Former Fellow, Nonproliferation Program, Moscow Center
Petr Topychkanov
SecurityTechnologySouth AsiaIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Two men sit on red chairs in front of a window with a NYC city skyline.
    Paper
    AI Breakout Capacity: A Middle-Power Path Between Racing and Dependence

    Germany, India, and other middle powers can’t build frontier AI alone, and they risk being cut off if they depend on the United States or China. The way through is to build the capacity for a frontier sprint while hoping never to use it.

      • Anton Leicht

      Anton Leicht, Sam Winter-Levy

  • large boat sitting off a coastline
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Impacts of the Houthis’ Advance Could Extend Well Beyond Saudi Arabia

    The Horn of Africa countries are among those facing a new security calculus.

      • Andrew Leber
      • Dr. Lesley Anne Warner

      Andrew Leber, Lesley Anne Warner

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Will the Far Right Change Europe’s Russia Policy?

    The European far right might fail to steer EU policy in the direction Russia wants, but they will create enough chaos inside Europe to benefit the Kremlin.

      Dimitar Bechev

  • Greenland United States Denmark Agreement Nuuk
    Commentary
    The Denmark-Greenland-U.S. Agreement Needs to Stand the Test of Time

    The new U.S.–Denmark–Greenland agreement will help Washington exert political, economic, and financial dominance under the guise of security. Yet, it acknowledged Copenhagen’s and Nuuk’s sovereignty on the island.

      Marc Pierini

  • The Disruptive Politics of AI
    Research
    The Disruptive Politics of AI

    AI technology has proliferated extensively and offers authoritarian leaders three crucial advantages: scale, speed, and efficiency. As a result, it has undoubtedly become a crucial tool of repression. But AI tools also give individuals and activists the means to organize, resist, and hold their governments accountable. Today, it is far more difficult for autocratic leaders to hide their corrupt practices and govern in darkness.

      • Steve Feldstein

      Steve Feldstein, Shreya Joshi

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.