• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Chinese Takeaway: Modi’s Geopolitics

Although nimble diplomacy can paper over the emerging cracks in India’s multi-alignment strategy, Delhi will need to make some difficult judgements on where its interests might lie when push comes to shove among the great powers.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Jul 7, 2015
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

Source: Indian Express

If Prime Minister Narendra Modi was the new kid on the diplomatic block at the 2014 BRICS summit in Brazil, he is heading to the next round in Russia this week with both experience and credibility. Although his room for political manoeuvre at home may have begun to shrink, Modi is well placed to persist with his vigorous diplomacy. Modi’s real challenge, however, comes from renewed great power rivalry that is altering India’s external environment. The relative harmony among the major powers after the Cold War had given Modi’s recent predecessors the freedom to pursue good relations with all of them.

The last quarter of a century saw India sustain its old partnership with Russia, expand the engagement with China, Japan, Europe and America. Modi has pursued each of these relationships with greater purpose. New Delhi has had a great run so far, claiming strategic partnerships with all in the name of “multi-alignment”. It could stand with the US leaders and claim India and America are “natural allies”. The next day it would join the Russians and Chinese in calling for a “multipolar world”.

That was clever; but only as long as the great powers were not fighting with each other. But as relations between America, Russia and China enter a period of flux, Modi’s India is bound to face problems sooner than later. America and Russia are now trying to stare down each other in Central Europe. China is trying to limit American influence in Asia and Washington is strengthening its traditional alliances and seeking to build new partnerships.

Swing State

During the Cold War, non-aligned India avoided making choices for quite some time, but in the end drifted closer to the Soviet Union. Delhi also tried to complicate the game by framing a North-South divide that could cut across the East-West rivalry. At the end of the Cold War, India found itself on the side of the losing great power and discovered that the rhetoric about the “Global South” was a lot of hot air.

This time round, India is in a much better position to navigate the great power rivalries. Thanks to the reforms of the last 25 years, India’s weight in the international system has improved considerably. It is the world’s seventh largest economy in nominal terms and the third largest when measured in terms of PPP. India has the world’s third-largest armed forces and ranks eighth in defence spending.

Although many see India’s potential to shape the global balance of power in the new round of great power contestation, Delhi’s foreign policy discourse continues to be dominated by the metaphor of “non-alignment” and the mindset of a weak state. Are there other ways of thinking about India’s grand strategy? Sure. Delhi could turn to classical geopolitics in understanding the global power shift. India must also focus on the imperatives of its geographic location, growing economic interdependence, and political values when debating its choices.

Indo-pacific, Eurasia

In January, Modi signed a joint statement with US President Barack Obama on India’s shared vision with America for promoting security and prosperity in the Indian Ocean and the Asia Pacific. The two leaders envisaged not only expanded bilateral strategic cooperation but also the building of an Indo-Pacific maritime coalition.

This week, Modi will join two multilateral summits that aim to constrain American power. One is the BRICS forum that has evolved from a Russian initiative in the mid-1990s for building a strategic triangle with China and India. Given India’s multiple disputes with Beijing, Delhi was none too eager. But India has simply drifted along with the ever-expanding agenda of the BRICS.

The other is the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), a Chinese initiative. While Russia and China have contradictions of their own, they are backing each other’s efforts to build non-Western international and regional institutions. They also want to bring a synergy between Russia’s plan to build a Eurasian Economic Union and China’s Silk Road strategy.

The Russian and Chinese presidents, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, would certainly want to draft Modi as part of the Eurasian continental alliance they are building. Although nimble diplomacy can paper over the emerging cracks in India’s multi-alignment strategy, Delhi will need to make some difficult judgements on where its interests might lie when push comes to shove among the great powers.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicySouth AsiaIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Georgia’s Fall From U.S. Favor Heralds South Caucasus Realignment

    With the White House only interested in economic dealmaking, Georgia finds itself eclipsed by what Armenia and Azerbaijan can offer.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Crowds holding Iranian flags and photos of the late Khamenei
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Who Will Be Iran’s Next Supreme Leader?

    If the succession process can be carried out as Khamenei intended, it will likely bring a hardliner into power.

      • Eric Lob

      Eric Lob

  • A missile tail embedded in the ground in an open field with green ground cover and a blue sky.
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Turkey Has Two Key Interests in the Iran Conflict

    But to achieve either, it needs to retain Washington’s ear.

      Alper Coşkun

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does War in the Middle East Mean for Russia–Iran Ties?

    If the regime in Tehran survives, it could be obliged to hand Moscow significant political influence in exchange for supplies of weapons and humanitarian aid.

      Nikita Smagin

  • people watching smoke rising at sunrise from rooftops
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.

    Just look at Iraq in 1991.

      Marwan Muasher

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600Fax: 202 483 1840
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.