• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "Pakistan",
    "India"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Raja-Mandala: PM Modi’s Pakistan Surprise

In refusing to call off the talks between Indian and Pakistani national security advisers, Modi might be signalling the strength to rethink the core assumptions of India’s recent Pakistan policy.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Aug 20, 2015
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

Source: Indian Express

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Pakistan policy continues to surprise. A year ago, the Modi government called off the foreign secretary’s visit to Islamabad when Pakistan’s high commissioner in Delhi, Abdul Basit, met a group of Kashmiri separatists.

Modi has decided not to respond in the same manner when confronted with a similar situation on the eve of the talks in Delhi between the two national security advisers, Ajit Doval and Sartaj Aziz. 

Senior officials in Delhi have made no secret of their anger at Pakistan’s decision to invite the Hurriyat leaders to meet Aziz who is arriving here on Sunday. 

They have also said that Islamabad’s decision follows Pakistan army’s deliberate provocations on the Line of Control, and the recent terrorist incidents at Gurdaspur and Udhampur. 

Delhi believes that the civilian government in Pakistan is under pressure from its army to walk back from the understandings reached last month between Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Modi on the margins of a multilateral gathering in Ufa, Russia.

The two leaders had agreed to convene a dialogue on terrorism between the two national security advisers and get their security forces to find ways to de-escalate the military tensions on the Line of Control. 

In Pakistan, there was a strong view that Sharif had ceded too much ground to Modi by agreeing to ‘stand alone’ talks on terrorism. The tradition in Pakistan is to put the question of Jammu & Kashmir on par with India’s concerns on cross-border terrorism. 

If the Pakistan army was hoping that its provocations might compel India to call off the talks again, Delhi says it is in no mood to oblige. For the moment, the Modi government has chosen “anger management” as it contemplates the next steps in dealing with Pakistan. 

Some reports suggest that Delhi might have a ‘surprise’ in store for Pakistan at the talks between the Doval and Aziz this weekend. Unpredictability is not without its value in international diplomacy. Its keeps your adversaries guessing and off balance. 

Unpredictability, however, complicates the domestic management of negotiations with rivals and difficult partners. The Modi government is already under attack at home for its flip-flops on Pakistan.

Critics point to Modi’s decision to invite Sharif for his swearing in ceremony last May, the abrupt cancellation of talks a few months later and the decision to renew the dialogue last month. 

Modi government is not the first one in Delhi to find itself on a roller coaster with Pakistan. “On again, off again” has been the general pattern of the engagement between India and Pakistan for many years. 

What we don’t know yet is whether Modi’s Pakistan policy is falling into this mould. Unlike many of its recent predecessors, Modi has the domestic political clout to avoid bending to the volatile domestic mood swings in Pakistan. 

In the last few weeks, Modi has shown the capacity to ‘grin and bear it’ as Sharif could not sustain his Ufa commitments. In refusing to act in a predictable manner and call off the NSA talks, Modi might be signalling the strength to rethink the core assumptions of India’s recent Pakistan policy. 

But unpredictability, can’t be an end itself. The ability to generate frequent tactical surprise must be part of a well-crafted strategy. Sooner than later, Modi will have tell the nation that he has one and what it is. 

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
Foreign PolicySouth AsiaPakistanIndia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Trump holding a glass of champagne up in a toast, with a table of guests in the foreground
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.

    The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.

      • Jeffrey Prescott

      Jeffrey Prescott

  • Article
    Separable, not Separate: Governing Europe’s Collective Defense

    European NATO countries are wrestling with the possibility of U.S. disengagement from the alliance. With the continent’s security increasingly uncertain, governments must restore the credibility of their collective defense.

      Hans-Dieter Lucas, Adam Thomson, Pierre Vimont

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    International Demand for Russia’s Arctic Shipping Route Is Unlikely to Last

    Cargo traffic through Russia’s Northern Sea Route has increased because of the disruption caused by the conflict in the Middle East, the Ukraine war, and U.S.-China tensions.

      • Mikhail Korostikov

      Mikhail Korostikov

  • Tourists taking photos in front of the White House on a sunny day
    Paper
    Squandering Attraction: How the Second Trump Administration is Undermining American Soft Power

    Soft power on its own is insufficient to meet U.S. national security needs, but hard power also has its limits. Soft power allows for more effective and efficient use of hard power than hard power alone, as it encourages cooperation and compliance which deters the need for hard power.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes

  • Close-up of Lithium-Ion Battery Pack
    Research
    Battery Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis of Lithium-Ion Tech Policy

    A deep dive into the policy ecosystems behind battery development in China, South Korea, Japan, the European Union (including some of its member states), the United States, Canada, and India.

      • +5

      Milo McBride, Herbert Crowther, Darcie Draudt-Véjares, …

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.