• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Balázs Jarábik"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "russia",
  "programs": [
    "Russia and Eurasia"
  ],
  "projects": [
    "Reforming Ukraine"
  ],
  "regions": [
    "Eastern Europe",
    "Ukraine"
  ],
  "topics": []
}

Source: Getty

Other

Democracy and Disorientation: Ukraine Votes in Local Elections

Ukrainians will go to the polls on October 25 to choose their mayors and local council deputies.

Link Copied
By Balázs Jarábik
Published on Oct 23, 2015
Program mobile hero image

Program

Russia and Eurasia

The Russia and Eurasia Program continues Carnegie’s long tradition of independent research on major political, societal, and security trends in and U.S. policy toward a region that has been upended by Russia’s war against Ukraine.  Leaders regularly turn to our work for clear-eyed, relevant analyses on the region to inform their policy decisions.

Learn More
Project hero Image

Project

Reforming Ukraine

Carnegie’s Reforming Ukraine project provides objective, rigorous, evidence-based assessments of the Ukrainian reform effort via a series of regular publications, workshops, and events prepared by a team of Carnegie fellows and independent experts based in Ukraine.

Learn More

Who and what are Ukrainians voting for on Sunday?

Ukrainians will go to the polls on October 25 to choose their mayors and local council deputies. The vote will take place throughout the country, with the exception of Russian-occupied Crimea, rebel-controlled Donbas, and a handful of municipalities adjacent to the conflict zone where Kyiv has deemed it unsafe to hold elections.

These elections will be important as the first gauge of the government’s performance since the parliamentary elections of October 2014, and will empower a new cohort of local politicians who will be responsible for the implementation of the decentralization reforms currently being debated in the Rada.

The results will also likely determine the next moves for the ruling coalition, namely whether President Petro Poroshenko will feel the need to reshuffle the government or schedule another parliamentary election.

How does the electorate look before the elections?

Although recent public opinion surveys show high public interest in the elections—71 percent of respondents in a recent IFES survey said they were likely to vote—past experience suggests that the turnout may in fact be below 50 percent. The IFES poll shows that 12.8 percent of very likely voters support Poroshenko’s and Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko’s Solidarity bloc; 10.5 percent favor former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko’s Batkivshchyna party; 8 percent support Lviv Mayor Andriy Sadovyi’s Samopomich party; 6.4 percent support the Radical Party; 4.1 percent—the Opposition Bloc; 3.1 percent—Right Sector; and 11 percent—other parties. Thirty-six percent of voters are undecided. Only Solidarity has support across the entire country; other parties rely largely on regional strongholds.

The dirty campaigning of the pre-Maidan era is alive and well. Over 130 blocs and parties have fielded candidates. A number of the so-called “technical candidates” reportedly have been entered in the race with the apparent sole purpose of undermining the competition and confusing voters. Several new parties are reportedly being funded by Party of Regions’ affiliated businessmen, as well as oligarch Ihor Kolomoysky who has conducted a vigorous anti-Poroshenko campaign since being dismissed from his post as governor of Dnepropetrovsk in March. These new parties include the new patriotic party Ukrop and several local parties. Some of them have measurable support thanks to massive billboard and television advertising campaigns.

How will the elections affect Ukraine's political trajectory?

Public opinion surveys also indicate a general decline in public confidence in political leaders. According to IFES, Poroshenko’s confidence rating is down to 32 percent, from 69 percent a year ago. Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk is faring even worse: his confidence rating is down from 60 percent to 20 percent. His People’s Front party has not even registered candidates in this election. Tymoshenko, whose confidence rating has risen to 25 percent from 17 percent last year, is the only key figure whose approval has gone up. A strong showing by Tymoshenko and her Batkivshchyna party in the October 25 election could enable her to force Poroshenko’s hand into calling an early parliamentary election. Tymoshenko appears likely to emerge as Poroshenko’s biggest rival as a result, thus possibly leaving him little choice but to seek an alliance with the Opposition Bloc.

What does President Poroshenko want?

Poroshenko’s goal appears to be to ensure his party’s dominant position at the local level. To achieve that, he reportedly has made concessions to local strongmen in key cities like Kharkiv and Odessa. Poroshenko will probably want to avoid early parliamentary elections and will try to sustain the current ruling coalition.

How will the election result affect the Minsk process and the upcoming Rada vote on decentralization?

Although local elections are not supposed to impact the implementation of the Minsk accords, which is in the hands of the central government in Kyiv, a strong showing by the Opposition Bloc and Tymoshenko’s Batkivshchyna could weaken Poroshenko’s hand.

Poroshenko will need to muster 300 votes in the Rada to pass the decentralization legislation. In order to do that, he will need the support of the nationalist-patriotic-leaning parties and the Opposition Bloc. Poroshenko will need a major concession from Russia in order to get their votes, which appears unlikely. The prospect of Tymoshenko’s strong showing in the election makes the likelihood of the decentralization package passing the Rada even smaller, and as a result raises new doubts about the implementation of the Minsk accords.

About the Author

Balázs Jarábik

Political analyst, former Slovak diplomat, and consultant specializing in Eastern Europe

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    Notes From Kyiv: Is Ukraine Preparing for Elections?

      Balázs Jarábik

  • Commentary
    Belarus at the Border: The Limits of Reengagement

      Balázs Jarábik

Balázs Jarábik

Political analyst, former Slovak diplomat, and consultant specializing in Eastern Europe

Balázs Jarábik
Eastern EuropeUkraine

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    As Trump Threatens to Quit NATO, the Baltic States Are Playing for Time

    Governments in Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania want to ensure that a U.S. military withdrawal would not leave them dangerously exposed to a Russian attack.

      Sergejs Potapkins

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Azerbaijan Looks to Tap Ukraine’s Military Expertise With Raft of New Deals

    Baku’s backing for Ukraine is less about confronting Russia than about quietly broadening the mix of partners it relies on.

      Zaur Shiriyev

  • A Ukrainian flag is seen attached to a burned car at the site of a heavily damaged residential building following Russian air strike in the city of Ternopil, on November 19, 2025, amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
    Paper
    In Fraught Geopolitical Times, Accountability for Russian Aggression Remains Crucial Despite U.S. Policy Reversals

    As the war in Ukraine enters its fifth year, it is worth examining where accountability efforts currently stand, how U.S. policy on Russian aggression has shifted, and what the Ukrainian experience reveals about the challenges of holding international aggressors to account.

      • Federica D'Alessandra

      Federica D’Alessandra

  • Article
    EU Integration Without Ratification?

    Countries face several hurdles in joining the EU, including the final stage of ratifying their accession treaties. Procedural reforms and substantive adjustments could help move the process forward.

      Stefan Lehne

  • Aerial view of Chernobyl damage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Chernobyl Is Still a Current Event, Forty Years Later

    The 1986 incident showed that a nuclear accident anytime is a nuclear accident for all time.

      Corey Hinderstein

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.