• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Jen Psaki"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Bush and Obama Remind Us: This is Not Normal

In remarks that seemed as bookends, former Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama reminded the United States of what the country and its values are based on, regardless of who is occupying the Oval Office.

Link Copied
By Jen Psaki
Published on Oct 20, 2017

Source: CNN

We spent this week debating whether or not past presidents of the United States reached out to the families of the men and women who bravely lost their lives serving our country. That is how low our politics have sunk.

But on Thursday we had a break from this: we saw an uncoordinated moment of unity from the last two men who served as president -- two men who have had their share of differences on policy issues from Iraq to health care. On this day, they reminded us that everything isn't about politics. That the division that has been stoked along racial lines, the personal attacks, the lies and venom coming from the current President are not normal. And we can't forget that.

In remarks that seemed as bookends, Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama reminded us of who we are and what this country and our values are based on, regardless of who is occupying the Oval Office.

President Donald Trump wasn't actually mentioned by name in either of the past presidents' remarks. Their addresses weren't complicated or policy heavy. They were about human decency.

They were about the American values that we have begun to feel slipping away. Bush said in his speech -- at an event in New York dubbed "The Spirit of Liberty: At Home, In The World"-- Bigotry seems emboldened. Our politics seems more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication."
He talked about what moral leadership should look like, about the values we have woven into the fabric of our national identity for centuries now -- tolerance, acceptance, understanding, the capacity to reach not just across the aisle, but across the oceans.

"We know, deep down, that repression is not the wave of the future. We know that the desire for freedom is not confined to, or owned by, any culture; it is the inborn hope of our humanity."

And later in the afternoon, during a campaign appearance for Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam, the Democratic nominee running against Republican Ed Gillespie in the Virginia governor's race, Obama sounded similar themes. "We are rejecting a politics of division," he told the crowd. "We are rejecting a politics of fear. We are embracing a politics that says everybody deserves a chance, a politics that says everybody has dignity and worth; a politics of hope."

These are ideas both men have been talking about for years, ones that -- regardless of our political leanings -- we must hold tight to even in a time of turmoil.

In the final section of his speech, Bush spoke about activism of citizens, "Our identity as a nation -- is not determined by geography or ethnicity, by soil or blood. Being an American involves the embrace of high ideals and civic responsibility."

The remarks of these two were a sobering reminder of how far our leadership has fallen, because as long as we continue looking for a moral compass, for tolerance, for comfort in times of need, for empathy from this White House, we will continue to be disappointed.

There will be other times when President Bush, President Obama, President Bill Clinton and others will come out of retirement from public office to remind us of who we are, but the remarks we heard today should resound as an early and stirring reminder that we have more in common than not -- and that we are living in an uncommon time when language and political passion are being used to divide us.

And it is not normal.

This article was orginally published on CNN. 

About the Author

Jen Psaki

Former Nonresident Scholar

Jen Psaki was a nonresident scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Jen Psaki
Former Nonresident Scholar
Jen Psaki
Political ReformNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Person pointing and shouting while holding a protest sign against the Ebola facility
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Bigger Problem with the U.S.-Kenya Ebola Deal

    Washington’s transactional foreign policy is making it indistinguishable from Beijing’s, with consequential implications for African agency.

      Jane Munga

  • Paper
    Loyal but Powerless: The Downgrading of Russia’s Elite

    The ruling elites in contemporary Russia are not a political class, but a community of managers who are not subject to competition or public accountability. The state is becoming an operating apparatus without any internal autonomy.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Board Up Donald Trump’s Failed Board of Peace

    What is behind Marco Rubio’s announcement that the body is now an international nongovernmental organization?

      • Zaha Hassan

      Zaha Hassan

  • US President Donald Trump delivers remarks to the United Nations General Assembly at the UN headquarters in New York City on September 23, 2025.
    Paper
    Retreat, Rebel, Replace, or Reform? Making Sense of Multilateralism Under Trump 2.0

    The conventional narrative of the second Trump administration simply repudiating multilateralism is incomplete. The record to date is far more mixed and varies across issue areas and institutions.

      Gustavo Romero, Stewart Patrick

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    What Does Pashinyan’s Parliamentary Victory Mean for Armenia’s Future?

    Pashinyan’s pro-European party has been re-elected with a decisive victory. But the pro-Russian opposition could still slow Armenia’s progress toward peace with Azerbaijan and rapprochement with Europe.

      Mikayel Zolyan

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.