• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Temur Umarov",
    "Nargis Kassenova"
  ],
  "type": "commentary",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie China"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Carnegie China Commentaries"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Central Asia",
    "Russia"
  ],
  "topics": []
}

Source: Getty

Commentary

China and Russia’s Overlapping Interests in Central Asia

Russia has its Eurasian Economic Union, and China has its Belt and Road Initiative. For both projects, Central Asia is important.

Link Copied
By Temur Umarov and Nargis Kassenova
Published on Feb 22, 2024

This Q&A was adapted from a Carnegie China live event assessing China–Central Asian relations. It has been edited for clarity.

Temur Umarov: It has become clearer in the past two years that Russia is a priority for China. But many experts say that Central Asia may be a weak point in the partnership between Beijing and Moscow. One day, the thinking goes, there could be some kind of conflict, because both Russia and China have overlapping interests in the region. Do you agree with this perception, or do you think that the level of regional cooperation between China and Russia is underestimated?

Nargis Kassenova: The reality is more subtle and murky than either competition and rivalry or cooperation. It is a mix of the two. China and Russia cooperate where their interests overlap or partially overlap, and they compete where they don’t overlap. In terms of overlapping interests, at least up until now, both countries were interested in stability in the region. Both were interested in the development of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as an international, multilateral organization that is an alternative to the Western-led order.

On the other hand, their interests didn’t quite overlap in the areas of economic development and trade. Russia has its Eurasian Economic Union, and China has its Belt and Road Initiative. For both projects, Central Asia is important.

In the aftermath of the 2014 annexation of Crimea and the sanctions imposed by the West, Russia expressed interest in linking its project with China’s, but not much happened on the ground. So now, with the change in the balance of power, as China is becoming stronger and Russia is losing its position, we will see whether China becomes more assertive in the region. But Chinese policymakers are quite patient. They know that time is on their side and the region is gravitating more and more toward China for various reasons.

Of course, China is an attractive partner. It has a dynamic economy. While China may have difficulties now, the Chinese economy is still incredibly important for Central Asian economies. And politically, the more Central Asia fears Russia, the more it could cling to China. For China, Central Asia is an important neighborhood. China is interested in the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Central Asian states.

If we compare the two joint statement made by [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and [Chinese President] Xi [Jinping] in March last year, with the declaration made by Xi and Central Asian presidents in Xi’an in May, we see two very different documents. The China-Russia document is very short and comprised primarily of Beijing’s priorities. If you look at the Xi’an declaration, it is much more comprehensive. Compared to China’s offerings to Russia, Beijing is giving a lot more to its Central Asian neighbors.

This may have something to do with the hierarchies. For China, Central Asian states are small states on its periphery. China positions itself as a big, benevolent power vis-à-vis Central Asians. But Russia is on par with China. And you don’t need to be benevolent to someone in your weight category, so it is a tougher relationship.

About the Authors

Temur Umarov

Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center

Temur Umarov is an expert on China and Central Asia, and a fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center.

Nargis Kassenova

Senior fellow, Harvard Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies

Nargis Kassenova is a senior fellow and director of the Program on Central Asia at Harvard University's Davis Center.

Authors

Temur Umarov
Fellow, Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center
Temur Umarov
Nargis Kassenova
Senior fellow, Harvard Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies
Nargis Kassenova
East AsiaChinaCentral AsiaRussia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Aerial view of Chernobyl damage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Chernobyl Is Still a Current Event, Forty Years Later

    The 1986 incident showed that a nuclear accident anytime is a nuclear accident for all time.

      Corey Hinderstein

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    There Is No Shortcut for Europe in Armenia

    Europe has an interest in supporting Armenian leader Nikol Pashinyan as he tries to make peace with neighbors and loosen ties with Russia. But it is depersonalized support in the long term, not quickfire flash, that will win the day.

      Thomas de Waal

  • Article
    From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East Asia

    The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang

  • Article
    Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI Competition

    In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.

      Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee

  • China Financial Markets
    Commentary
    China Financial Markets
    Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?

    China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.

      Michael Pettis

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.