• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Trinh Nguyen"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "AP",
  "programs": [
    "Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "East Asia",
    "China",
    "Southeast Asia"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Political Reform",
    "Economy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Hong Kong Policy Paralysis Erodes Special Position to Benefit of Peers

While investment in Hong Kong may not change rapidly, continued uncertainty will erode the foundations that have made Hong Kong special in the minds of global businesses.

Link Copied
By Trinh Nguyen
Published on Sep 19, 2019
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More

Source: Hill

For decades, Hong Kong has thrived with its unique status, facilitating investment and trade between Asia and the West. Its airport, seaport, and railways link goods, services, and travelers to the region for trade and commerce, with rising connectivity with mainland China. While Chinese cities are investing heavily in hard infrastructure to rival Hong Kong, what is truly irreplaceable about Hong Kong is its special status, or “one country two systems,” that puts it in a unique position compared to the tightly controlled Chinese economic and financial system that includes import duties, value added taxes, capital controls, and restrained labor mobility.

Behind the capital market power of Hong Kong is its unique “soft infrastructure” that China has relied on to deal with the economic shortcomings of the mainland, especially access to international capital markets. Hong Kong is an important springboard for foreign direct investment, as 64 percent of inward foreign direct investment to the mainland comes from Hong Kong and 65 percent of outward foreign direct investment was also channeled through Hong Kong between 2010 and 2018. Hong Kong has long been the largest offshore center for China and holds a special access to Chinese equity and fixed income markets through stock and bond connections. The city took 73 percent of initial public offerings from mainland companies overseas from 2010 to 2018.

It is not just capital but also labor that can move freely in Hong Kong. Both Hong Kong residents and foreign residents enjoy relatively unrestricted travel due to fewer visa restrictions. The Hong Kong government markets itself to the international business community as the primary location for doing business in Asia and with mainland China. With the Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, the United States has treated Hong Kong as a special autonomous region and exempts it from many tariffs imposed on China.

Thanks to this, whether it is tourism, finance, or trade, Hong Kong is punching above its weight as regional and global players take advantage of this special status. Hong Kong International Airport, for example, boasts to be the largest air cargo hub, while the deepwater seaport ranks seventh busiest in the world. Hong Kong, with a population of 8 million, welcomed an impressive 65 million tourists last year.

The reexporting of goods is also huge, amounting to one and a half times the gross domestic product. Beyond trade and tourism, Hong Kong is seen as a parking place for regional wealth, given its strong property rights, rule of law, and open capital account. Real estate transaction value in Hong Kong last year was 23 percent of gross domestic product due to strong demand and perception of excellent storage of wealth.

While rapid integration with mainland China has served businesses, Hong Kong residents face increased competition from mainlanders for public goods, and believe upward mobility may be limited by more competition for assets and employment opportunities with China. The prolonged protests that shutdown the prized hard infrastructure of Hong Kong, especially its airport, and the clear ineffectiveness of policymakers in deescalating the tension indicates to investors that Hong Kong may not be the special and trusted place they initially thought it was.

Hong Kong now finds itself at risk as investors are looking to diversify. This current unrest limits investor security in bringing business to Hong Kong, but also increases scrutiny of Hong Kong businesses seeking to expand in other markets. Australia has already begun to treat investment from Hong Kong with the same scrutiny as the rest of China. In the United States, Congress is considering the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act that would leave the city vulnerable to American sanctions.

While Hong Kong is unlikely to face American sanctions, and the Chinese government still sees value in its ability to access global capital markets, investors are likely to hold off on additional investments in the city due to rising doubt surrounding its future. In a recent survey, 88 percent of businesses without offices in Hong Kong say that the political standoff would affect their future investment decisions, and 75 percent of those with offices there say that it would impact future investment decisions. 

The bottom line is that while investment in Hong Kong may not change rapidly, continued uncertainty will erode the foundations that have made Hong Kong special in the minds of global businesses. Other cities like Singapore are viable alternatives to Hong Kong for businesses seeking a foothold in Asia. But it is not just Singapore. Malaysia and Thailand have already seen an influx of investment into luxury real estate at the expense of Hong Kong. Tourism in Thailand also experienced a surge over the summer as mainland Chinese tourists stayed away from Hong Kong.

The policy paralysis to resolve the difficult equation of Hong Kong being special while rapidly integrating with China, not just in economics but also in soft infrastructure, is increasingly jeopardizing investor faith in the sustainability to remain autonomous as it assimilates with China. Investors are asking when it will ultimately be subsumed into the mainland and lose its special status for businesses wishing to engage with the Chinese economy. The longer this goes on, the more fear from investors will drive them to hedge by engaging with competitors of Hong Kong.

This article was originally published in the Hill.

About the Author

Trinh Nguyen

Former Nonresident Scholar, Asia Program

Trinh Nguyen was a nonresident scholar in the Asia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    BRICS Expansion and the Future of World Order: Perspectives from Member States, Partners, and Aspirants
      • +16

      Stewart Patrick, Erica Hogan, Oliver Stuenkel, …

  • Commentary
    Indonesia’s Controversial Fuel Price Hike Was Actually Necessary

      Trinh Nguyen

Trinh Nguyen
Former Nonresident Scholar, Asia Program
Trinh Nguyen
Political ReformEconomyEast AsiaChinaSoutheast Asia

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Will the Far Right Change Europe’s Russia Policy?

    The European far right might fail to steer EU policy in the direction Russia wants, but they will create enough chaos inside Europe to benefit the Kremlin.

      Dimitar Bechev

  • The nuclear missile formation passes through Tian'anmen Square during a military parade on September 3, 2025 in Beijing, China.
    Paper
    Untangling the Nuclear Knot: A Constructive Agenda for Managing China’s Nuclear Relations with the United States and Its Allies

    The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.

      Tong Zhao

  • Ukraine Russia Black Sea Food
    Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    A Black Sea Truce Is About Global Food Security, Too

    A summer of escalation in the Black Sea has hurt Ukraine economically and is exacerbating world food security. A truce is needed—as is a broader reframing of Europe’s Ukraine strategy.

      Thomas de Waal

  • Two men speaking
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Who Puts Guardrails on AI?

    Why governance of rapidly evolving technology will be distributed and complex.

      Stewart Patrick, Scott Singer

  • Trump walking toward Xi, both with arms extended to shake hands
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The U.S. and China Need an AI Hotline. Here’s How to Build It.

    It should address the shortcomings of previous crisis communication efforts and adapt to the demands of frontier AI.

      • Lucy Luo

      Lucy Luo

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.