REQUIRED IMAGE
On May 12, the United States, North Korea and the other members of the 6-Party talks on North Korea’s nuclear program will hold a first round of working level talks. Don’t expect any progress, however, either at these talks or anytime until after the November U.S. election. Both sides are playing the waiting game and hoping the circumstances will improve their position after the election.
Each day that passes allows North Korea to advance its nuclear capabilities and further establish itself as the ninth nuclear weapon state. The exact size of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal is a mystery, but press reports suggest that portions of the U.S. intelligence community believe Pyongyang has quadrupled its arsenal to 8-9 weapons in the past year.
On May 12, the United States, North Korea and the other members of the 6-Party talks on North Korea’s nuclear program will hold a first round of working level talks. Don’t expect any progress, however, either at these talks or anytime until after the November U.S. election. Both sides are playing the waiting game and hoping the circumstances will improve their position after the election.
Each day that passes allows North Korea to advance its nuclear capabilities and further establish itself as the ninth nuclear weapon state. The exact size of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal is a mystery, but press reports suggest that portions of the U.S. intelligence community believe Pyongyang has quadrupled its arsenal to 8-9 weapons in the past year. It’s not known if North Korea is willing to trade its nuclear capabilities for a new relationship with the United States, but it is clear that the price they may demand for yielding their nuclear assets has gone up, not down, since the slow moving nuclear crisis began in October 2002. It also appears that Pyongyang hopes to find a more willing negotiating partner should Senator John Kerry win the November election.
The Bush administration continues to hold to a tough public line, maintaining that the U.S. will only improve relations with Pyongyang once that state agrees to the complete, verified, and irreversible dismantlement of its nuclear program. The goal is the right one, but demanding that Pyongyang move first to disarm before any benefits begin to flow to the North has allowed North Korea to play the victim in the international arena. Even close U.S. allies in the region are asking the U.S. to show more flexibility. It appears, however, that the United States is prepared to maintain this line as long as the negotiating process, such as it is, continues. On-going talks, despite a total lack of progress, allow the President and his campaign to maintain the U.S. is successfully managing the nuclear issue, when in fact it is moving closer and closer to growing out of anyone’s control. In the end, the President’s advisors believe they will be in a stronger position to negotiate if and when they win re-election.
So with both sides waiting out the clock, there is little hope that progress
will be made anytime soon. However, as the clock continues to tick, Pyongyang
may look to create an even greater crisis at a time of its choosing to put pressure
on the U.S. to negotiate under duress. Previously, such gambits were unsettling.
Now that North Korea’s nuclear capabilities are coming of age, they are
more dangerous than ever.
Additional Resources:
Click here to return to ProliferationNews.org
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang
In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee
The crisis is not just a story of energy vulnerability. It’s also a complex, high-stakes political challenge.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares
The conflict is exposing the deep energy vulnerabilities of Korea’s chip industry.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Tim Sahay
South Korea’s rapid demographic transition previews governance challenges many advanced and middle-income economies will face. This paper argues that aging is not only a care issue but a structural governance challenge—reshaping welfare, productivity, and fiscal sustainability, and reorganizing responsibilities across the state, private sector, and society.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares
