Following the release of the Senate Intelligence Committee report on pre-war
assessments of Iraqi WMD, Carnegie has updated the four summary tables that
appear in WMD in Iraq: Evidence and Implications on each type of suspected
weapons: nuclear, chemical, biological, and missile and delivery programs.
The summary tables show several key patterns:
First, they detail how the intelligence assessments prior to 2002 were generally
accurate and cautious judgments, especially in describing Iraq's nuclear program.
Second, the tables show a dramatic shift between these earlier assessments
and the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, which depicted Iraq's WMD
programs as definite and expanding threats - with startling specificity.
Third, the United Nations inspectors appear to have had a generally accurate
assessment of Iraq's illicit programs, despite their limited resources and time
on the ground before the war.
Fourth, the tables show that U.S. administration officials misrepresented the
threat from Iraq's weapons far beyond the intelligence failures. Administration
officials and documents dropped the caveats, probabilities, and expressions
of uncertainty present in intelligence assessments from public statements.
Finally, the release on the Senate report shows that almost all of the key
judgments present in the NIE were "either overstated, or were not supported
by, the underlying intelligence."
These patterns also suggest that the intelligence assessments shifted dramatically
in 2002-for reasons other than just a failure in "analytic tradecraft."
While we applaud the Senate Committee's report, it is imperative that the committee
finish its work and expand its scope beyond the failures in the NIE to include
assessments prior to 2002, UN findings, administration statements, and current
evidence on the ground in Iraq. Only with an eye toward all these elements can
we fully understand - and remedy - this dramatic failure.
Additional Resources: