• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
Averting Crisis: A Path Forward for China's Healthcare System

Source: Getty

Article

Averting Crisis: A Path Forward for China's Healthcare System

An examination of the current structure of China's healthcare system, the obstacles that the regime must overcome to achieve universal healthcare, and the competing proposals for improving it.

Link Copied
By Meredith Wen
Published on Mar 9, 2009

Additional Links

Full Text
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More

The Urgency of Reform

On 21 January 2009, China's State Council revealed an ambitious plan to spend RMB 850 billion (USD 124b) by 2011 on providing universal primary medical care to its citizens.  Although reform has been ongoing, ensuring affordable access to basic health services for its citizenry has gained new urgency during the global financial crisis.  Official media recently estimated that 10 million migrant workers lost their jobs in the third quarter of 2008 and urban unemployment reached 4.2% at the end of December, the first jump in five years.  No job means no health insurance, and unemployment is only expected to grow.   

How has Chinese healthcare reached a state in which one-third of rural farmers reported not receiving any form of healthcare whatsoever in 2002 and less than half of urban residents were receiving medical coverage as of 2006?  In the mid-1970s and 80s, the central government had achieved nearly universal coverage of its citizens.  State-owned Enterprises (SOE) and rural collectives together covered an estimated 90% of Chinese citizens.  Yet this system proved financially unsustainable: abuse and overuse of free health services and the unrestricted spending of unaccountable state enterprises became too much of a burden on the state.  Both SOEs and collectives were eventually downsized or dismantled during market reforms. 

No social safety net had been established to replace this system of guaranteed medical care.  First, the emphasis on economic efficiency hardly left room to tackle a problem that clearly required large infusions of funding.  Second, it appears that the regime mistakenly assumed the market would give rise to sufficient health services.  As a result, millions lost healthcare access virtually overnight.  The regime belatedly began passing a series of ad hoc measures meant to regulate prices and provide citizens with medical coverage, but these have largely been unrealistic, bandage policies. 

Little attention has been paid to China’s ailing healthcare system in the West, even though the debate over healthcare has drawn officials, academics and industry insiders into one of the most open policy discussions going on in China today.  While the space allotted here does not allow for a definitive compilation of the challenges facing China’s healthcare system, it does attempt to discuss the past and current system as comprehensively as possible.  Thus this brief is organized as follows:

  • Section I outlines the current structure of both urban and rural healthcare schemes. 
     
  • Section II analyzes three interrelated and, arguably the biggest systemic obstacles the regime must
    overcome in order to reach universal healthcare: funding, costs, and coverage. 
     
  • Section III examines the social, economic and political repercussions of the system’s failures. 
     
  • Section IV presents the strengths and weaknesses of two suggested, competing solutions to the healthcare crisis that have emerged in policy circles. 
     
  • Section V looks at the future of healthcare policy.

About the Author

Meredith Wen

Carnegie Beijing

Meredith Wen
Carnegie Beijing
East AsiaChinaPolitical ReformEconomy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Abstract image of China and AI
    Article
    China’s Pivot on Global AI

    Beijing’s AI diplomacy is pivoting from infrastructure and associated technical standards toward a more comprehensive effort aimed at recrafting global norms and institutions of AI governance.

      Arindrajit Basu

  • wide shot of the city of Dakar by the water
    Commentary
    Senegal: An Island of Resilience

    During our visit, we observed a democracy that has learned from its difficult past and is working toward an even more dynamic future.

      • Sarah Yerkes

      Sarah Yerkes, Natalie Triche

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    In Russia, Private Companies Have Been Left to Pick Up the Tab for Ukrainian Drone Attacks

    The cost of air defense has become an unregistered tax on revenue for businesses. While military rents are consolidated in the federal budget, the costs of defense are being spread across the balance sheets of companies and regional governments.

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • San Francisco Skyline
    Paper
    California’s Global Trade Cities: Driving Local and National Outcomes

    Cities across the United States facilitate investment in American communities. Yet, because global attention remains focused on U.S. trade policy, their distinctive and bold local approaches to international trade and investment promotion are often underappreciated.

      • Wyatt Frank
      • Marissa Jordan

      Wyatt Frank, Marissa Jordan

  • Tiananmen Gate with US and Chinese flags
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump and Xi Should Tackle a Previously Impossible AI Conversation

    Previous dialogues ended in failure. This time could be different.

      Scott Singer

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.