• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
Averting Crisis: A Path Forward for China's Healthcare System

Source: Getty

Article

Averting Crisis: A Path Forward for China's Healthcare System

An examination of the current structure of China's healthcare system, the obstacles that the regime must overcome to achieve universal healthcare, and the competing proposals for improving it.

Link Copied
By Meredith Wen
Published on Mar 9, 2009

Additional Links

Full Text
Program mobile hero image

Program

Asia

The Asia Program in Washington studies disruptive security, governance, and technological risks that threaten peace, growth, and opportunity in the Asia-Pacific region, including a focus on China, Japan, and the Korean peninsula.

Learn More

The Urgency of Reform

On 21 January 2009, China's State Council revealed an ambitious plan to spend RMB 850 billion (USD 124b) by 2011 on providing universal primary medical care to its citizens.  Although reform has been ongoing, ensuring affordable access to basic health services for its citizenry has gained new urgency during the global financial crisis.  Official media recently estimated that 10 million migrant workers lost their jobs in the third quarter of 2008 and urban unemployment reached 4.2% at the end of December, the first jump in five years.  No job means no health insurance, and unemployment is only expected to grow.   

How has Chinese healthcare reached a state in which one-third of rural farmers reported not receiving any form of healthcare whatsoever in 2002 and less than half of urban residents were receiving medical coverage as of 2006?  In the mid-1970s and 80s, the central government had achieved nearly universal coverage of its citizens.  State-owned Enterprises (SOE) and rural collectives together covered an estimated 90% of Chinese citizens.  Yet this system proved financially unsustainable: abuse and overuse of free health services and the unrestricted spending of unaccountable state enterprises became too much of a burden on the state.  Both SOEs and collectives were eventually downsized or dismantled during market reforms. 

No social safety net had been established to replace this system of guaranteed medical care.  First, the emphasis on economic efficiency hardly left room to tackle a problem that clearly required large infusions of funding.  Second, it appears that the regime mistakenly assumed the market would give rise to sufficient health services.  As a result, millions lost healthcare access virtually overnight.  The regime belatedly began passing a series of ad hoc measures meant to regulate prices and provide citizens with medical coverage, but these have largely been unrealistic, bandage policies. 

Little attention has been paid to China’s ailing healthcare system in the West, even though the debate over healthcare has drawn officials, academics and industry insiders into one of the most open policy discussions going on in China today.  While the space allotted here does not allow for a definitive compilation of the challenges facing China’s healthcare system, it does attempt to discuss the past and current system as comprehensively as possible.  Thus this brief is organized as follows:

  • Section I outlines the current structure of both urban and rural healthcare schemes. 
     
  • Section II analyzes three interrelated and, arguably the biggest systemic obstacles the regime must
    overcome in order to reach universal healthcare: funding, costs, and coverage. 
     
  • Section III examines the social, economic and political repercussions of the system’s failures. 
     
  • Section IV presents the strengths and weaknesses of two suggested, competing solutions to the healthcare crisis that have emerged in policy circles. 
     
  • Section V looks at the future of healthcare policy.

About the Author

Meredith Wen

Carnegie Beijing

Meredith Wen
Carnegie Beijing
East AsiaChinaPolitical ReformEconomy

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Does Azerbaijan Want to See Win Armenia’s Elections?

    By fueling the arguments of both supporters and opponents of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Azerbaijan wants to ensure he is re-elected with a weaker mandate.

      Bashir Kitachaev

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse

    A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.  

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Article
    Managing Divergence: India’s BRICS Presidency in 2026

    This piece argues that India’s central challenge is not managing a single flashpoint but resolving the underlying tension between expansion and institutional coherency of the BRICS grouping.

      Vrinda Sahai

  • Trump and Bessent sitting next to each other
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump’s AI Order Won’t Stymie U.S. Competition with China

    Beijing regulated AI—and then Chinese AI companies took off.

      Matt Sheehan

  • Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump and Xi Are Angling for Three Years of Stability

    But their "principal to principal" model will only be as effective as the political strength of each leader back home.

      • Damien Ma

      Damien Ma

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.