Q&A
Sarah Yerkes
{
"authors": [
"Sarah Yerkes"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "MEP",
"programs": [
"Middle East"
],
"projects": [
"Tunisia Monitor"
],
"regions": [
"North Africa",
"Tunisia"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
Political Islam in Tunisia: The History of Ennahda By Anne Wolf
The role of Tunisia’s primary Islamist party—Ennahda—within the country’s political scene ebbed and flowed both during and after the 2011 revolution. Understanding how Ennahda got to where it is today is crucial to understanding where it—and the country—is going.
By Sarah Yerkes
Published on Jun 4, 2019
Source: Journal of Islamic Studies
The role of Tunisia’s primary Islamist party—Ennahda—within the country’s political scene ebbed and flowed both during and after the 2011 revolution. Today, despite a parliamentary system with dozens of political parties in some form of power, Tunisia operates like a two-party democracy, with power vacillating between Ennahda and its primary rival, Nidaa Tounes. Understanding how Ennahda got to where it is today is crucial to understanding where it—and the country—is going.
While the party’s initial success was consistent with an Islamist wave that swept across the Arab Spring states in 2011–2012, Ennahda has continued to succeed where other Islamist parties in the region—particularly Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood—have dramatically failed. Anne Wolf’s book, Political Islam in Tunisia, offers a comprehensive overview of the history of Ennahda, examining not only the origins and evolution of this Islamist party but also the way the country has dealt with the highly contentious issue of what role religion should play in politics. The book tackles this question in today’s democratic context, but also provides the reader with a brief overview of the role religion played in the pre-independence period, as well as a longer treatment of the Bourguiba and Ben Ali eras....
This book review was originally published in the Journal of Islamic Studies.
About the Author
Sarah Yerkes
Acting Co-Director and Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Sarah Yerkes is acting co-director and a senior fellow in the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Her research focuses on democracy and governance, U.S. foreign policy towards the Middle East and North Africa, and political and economic reform in Tunisia.
- Morocco’s Historic Gender Equality Moment That Won’t Move the Needle
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Morocco’s Historic Gender Equality Moment That Won’t Move the NeedleCommentary
Fatima El Mansouri is the country’s first female prime minister. She’s also a privileged insider in a largely ceremonial position.
Sarah Yerkes
- How the Kremlin Achieved Its Latest Implausible Election ResultsCommentary
Sergei Kiriyenko used Russia’s parliamentary vote to further hone his strategy of corporate mobilization that is designed to maximize votes for United Russia.
Andrey Pertsev
- The Uncomfortable Truth About EU EnlargementCommentary
Before the next wave of EU enlargement takes place, the union needs to grapple with thorny questions of how power is distributed among its members.
Emil Sondaj Hansen, Ditte Brasso Sørensen
- Will the Far Right Change Europe’s Russia Policy?Commentary
The European far right might fail to steer EU policy in the direction Russia wants, but they will create enough chaos inside Europe to benefit the Kremlin.
Dimitar Bechev
- Leaving Russian-Speakers Without Representation Is a Risk for LatviaCommentary
If the Russian-speaking community in Latvia cannot articulate their interests without being seen as disloyal, they could end up embracing a pro-Kremlin agenda.
Sergejs Potapkins
