In April 2020, an internal report circulated by the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, a government-affiliated think tank associated with China’s top intelligence agency, contained a grave warning for China’s leadership. According to reporting by Reuters, it concluded that “global anti-China sentiment is at its highest since the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown.”
Many countries are realizing that China’s rise and ensuing departure from tenets of domestic and foreign policy, instilled during the era of former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping, break from their own views. Policymakers are increasingly alarmed, devising new means to protect their own systems of government, economic prosperity, and national security from a more assertive China.
Officials in the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump have been the most vocal, lambasting Beijing for a growing list of concerns but failing to put forward an effective response. Beijing’s ongoing domestic crackdown—evidenced by the internment of at least a million Uighurs in China’s Xinjiang Province and ongoing protests in Hong Kong—and discriminatory trade and economic policies, coercive foreign policy practices, “Wolf Warrior”–inspired diplomacy abroad, and military expansion in its direct periphery have heightened this global pushback and scrutiny.
China’s leadership may not recognize its own role in sparking such global pushback. Influential Chinese scholars have questioned the unfavorable international environment and argued that Chinese actions in the wake of the coronavirus should have garnered China acclaim rather than criticism. Washington, though outspoken in criticizing Beijing, needs to galvanize collective action with partners and allies to effectively address the growing number of shared concerns about China’s behavior.
Where Is China Facing Pushback?
In recent years, China has expanded its diplomatic and economic relationships, launching new institutions like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and positioning itself as a donor of much-needed public goods through policies like the vast amounts of infrastructure investment through the Belt and Road Initiative. As China’s influence has grown, so have the number of countries concerned with its lack of economic reciprocity, dominant technological policies, coercive foreign policy practices, and regional military ambitions.
This dynamic is most apparent in the rapid deterioration of the U.S.-China relationship. Just this month, the White House released a report arguing that growing Chinese power “harms vital American interests and undermines the sovereignty and dignity of countries and individuals around the world.” While perhaps the most obvious case, Washington is not the only example of hardening views against Beijing.
The EU, for example, has labeled China a “systemic rival” and “economic competitor,” reflecting hardening attitudes toward Beijing across Europe. Chinese practices of limited market access for foreign firms, industrial policies that explicitly displace international competitors, and preferential treatment for state-owned enterprises have pushed European countries like Germany and France to proactively prioritize their own development.
European concerns extend beyond economic reciprocity. Recognizing the national security vulnerabilities presented by using Chinese 5G technology, some European countries are reassessing Huawei as a provider of 5G infrastructure. In January 2020, the EU unveiled a recommended strategy for its member states aimed at preventing Beijing from dominating 5G markets and exploiting security vulnerabilities. Due to security concerns, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, and Romania have all signed agreements with the United States on 5G security that would limit the role of Huawei in their markets. Even the UK, which decided in January to allow Huawei a partial role in building out its 5G infrastructure, recently reversed course and is likely to pass legislation requiring Huawei to have no role in the country’s 5G networks by 2023. Instead, Britain has proposed forming a so-called “D10 club of democratic partners,” which would include the G7 countries—Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the UK, and the United States—plus Australia, India, and South Korea. The collective goal would be “to create alternative suppliers of 5G equipment and other technologies to avoid relying on China.”
In Australia, the first country to ban the 5G technology of Huawei and fellow Chinese firm ZTE, China faces growing scrutiny after Canberra uncovered worrisome Chinese meddling in its domestic politics. In response, Australia enacted stringent regulations stopping Beijing from undermining its political system, such as former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull’s overhaul of espionage and intelligence laws in December 2017 preventing Beijing from buying political influence and promoting Chinese interests.
In Asia, where strong economic ties with China are critical to development, Beijing has still managed to drum up resentment for its unyielding position on territorial claims in the South China Sea. Last year, Vietnam issued its first defense white paper in ten years in which it rejected Beijing’s claims and criticized China’s maritime tactics, citing “unilateral actions, power-based coercion, violation of international law, militarization, change in the status quo, and infringement upon Vietnam’s sovereignty, sovereign rights, and jurisdiction as provided in international law.” Other claimants, including Malaysia and the Philippines, are building up their militaries and strengthening outposts that would help push back against Chinese expansion.
Perhaps the most worrying signs for China’s leaders are the growing international concerns surrounding issues of Chinese sovereignty, which Beijing often calls a core interest. Last year, twenty-two countries issued a statement to the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights decrying China’s detention of at least one million Muslims in Xinjiang. The number of signatories represented was near double that of a similar statement issued in 2016. As China prepares to enact a national security law in Hong Kong that would further undermine its commitment to the one China, two systems policy, nearly 200 policymakers worldwide and multiple countries have issued statements condemning Beijing’s move. Some countries have even begun calling for change regarding Taiwan, a subject on which silence has been a critical requirement for relations with Beijing. Last month, thirteen UN member states submitted a proposal to restore Taiwan’s observer status at the World Health Assembly.
How Is China Responding to the Growing Pushback?
Criticism of Chinese policies, both at home and abroad, has revealed the grittier side of Beijing’s diplomacy. Frequently labeled “wolf warriors” after a highly popular patriotic blockbuster action film, Chinese diplomats have threatened economic retribution or taken to social media to chastise foreign governments that push back on Beijing. Chinese ambassadors in Denmark and Germany, for example, have warned of unspecified consequences if either country banned Huawei from their markets.
The coronavirus has only further highlighted this dynamic. While leaders in Washington and other capitals had clear political motivations to scapegoat Beijing for the outbreak to distract from their own policy failures, the pandemic has further accentuated Beijing’s more aggressive foreign policy. When more than 120 countries signed an agreement for an “impartial, independent, and comprehensive evaluation” of the “international health response to COVID-19,” Beijing saw this move as an attempt to expose its own role in the virus’s spread. In response, it took punitive actions against Australia—which initially called for the investigation. China’s ambassador warned that Australia was going down a “dangerous” path, and Beijing placed tariffs on Australian imports of barley and beef.
In the UK, some have called for a tougher line on China amid growing concerns over Beijing’s wolf warrior approach. The same holds true in Canada, where the specter of Chinese retribution has loomed large ever since Beijing arrested Canadian citizens Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor back in December 2018. Since the coronavirus pandemic began, a growing number of Canadian policymakers have been reorienting their political messaging to demand greater accountability from Beijing for its own early failures to contain the virus’s spread. Incidents in a host of countries including Australia, Brazil, Canada, Cyprus, France, India, Kazakhstan, New Zealand, Pakistan, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Venezuela have heightened anti-China rhetoric and led these nations to speak out.
Furthermore, Beijing has sought to censor its critics. Twice over the past two months, the EU has toned down rhetoric implicating China’s role in spreading the coronavirus following pressure from Beijing. In April, Brussels revised and softened language in a report that highlighted China’s “global disinformation campaign to deflect blame for the outbreak.” Just weeks later, the EU ambassador to China along with ambassadors from the EU’s twenty-seven member states allowed censorship of parts of an op-ed commemorating forty-five years of China-EU diplomatic relations that labeled China as the source of the coronavirus. EU officials and member states immediately raised concerns about what both these incidents might mean for future Chinese involvement in European politics.
What Is Driving This Approach and What Does It Mean for the United States?
Policymakers and analysts in Asia, Europe, and North America are raising serious and legitimate concerns about China’s growing influence. However, few voices in China acknowledge this. Several senior Chinese foreign policy advisers have urged Beijing to tone down its rhetoric. Chinese Ambassador to the United States Cui Tiankai also has distanced himself from the wolf warrior approach.
However, it appears that Beijing will not shift tactics anytime soon. Last fall, Chinese President Xi Jinping encouraged officials to “embrace a fighting spirit,” and last week, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi defended the approach and insisted it was necessary. Rather than adjusting its approach to account for greater global pushback, Beijing appears to be doubling down. Perhaps, despite facing a more hostile international environment, Chinese leaders recognize a unique opportunity to capitalize on discord between the United States and its allies and partners around the world.
Rather than raise the bar, Trump continues to lower it by mirroring Beijing’s worst policies, cutting off official dialogues at nearly all levels, and overreacting in ways that harm the United States’ own interests. Furthermore, the U.S. administration continues to forsake allies and partners, urging them to choose between Washington and Beijing without offering a clearly formulated plan. Trump has opened the door for Beijing to advance its strategic objectives without fearing a well-coordinated and comprehensive response from Washington and its partners in Europe and Asia.
The implications for U.S. policymakers are obvious. The United States should capitalize on growing concerns across a range of countries and align with like-minded partners to push back on China. As U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs David R. Stilwell remarked in late May, “The fact is that it’s not just U.S. and China . . . the world is finally recognizing that . . . Beijing is pushing a form of government that many only now are beginning to recognize as problematic.” While it is unreasonable for the United States to ask other countries to choose sides, growing global pushback presents an opportunity for Washington to better address Beijing’s most deleterious policies.
The authors are grateful for research assistance provided by Ethan Paul and Bernice Xu.
Comments(19)
These are very troubling developments you describe Paul, both the Chinese government's aggressiveness and the American administration's lack of effective response, one based on opinions of an small and loud group of extreme advisers. My frustration is magnified by China's ability to brandish its big and growing market, and "soft loans" to influence so many countries, including several in Europe. These practical commercial forces may just outweigh China's heavy-handed post-pandemic policies.
I think Donald Trump is playing this well in fact. In my opinion it was unrealistic to maintain hegemony in all these areas for so long. Becoming isolationist and pulling out of all of these world organizations is what the US needs to do to stay afloat. We were just draining our resources and financial institutions by always being a “leader”. If you allow China to overtake a region and start having to deal with its own energy demands it will want to start doing what the United States was doing. Looking for ways to influence the world order to favor itself in trade venues, economics, and government influence. Which is fine allow them to try to do the impossible. Attempt to gain world favor through hyper nationalism and deregulated manufacturing. When the world can acknowledge the horror of what it’s created then we all can talk eye to eye.
"Reuters concluded that “global anti-China sentiment is at its highest since the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown".” Since there was no 'crackdown' in Tiananmen Square in 1989, it is highly unlikely that a government memo would use that term or anything remotely resembling it. (The kids were safe home in bed by 7:15, as even our own State Department reported). Nor does the rest of Reuters' story ring true: the Capitalist world has been at war with China since we firebombed Wuhan in 1944, left the city burning for three days and 40,000 dead civilians. Now that China has the capacity to return the favor (its missiles far outrange ours) we are reduced to attempted corporate murder, as with Huawei, and making up silly stories like this one that every chancery on earth knows is a lie. The only 'global pushback' comes from crooked foreign politicians in thrall to the US. The other 90% of the world thinks the US is nuts and China is winning.
Unadulterated Chinese propaganda. Unsophisticated at that.
Hey Roberts, come out of your hole once in a while to see the sunshine. It will be good for you. "There was no 'crackdown' in Tiananmen Square in 1989"? Really?
this is how the Chinese affect the world. Its called the power of controlling the narrative. When you hear the same thing over and over, you begin to believe that everyone else thinks its true. which then makes it very simple to convince you something which is right is wrong and wrong is right. For example. Trump did a photo op with a bible at a church. But within the net week Nancy Pelosi did a photo op with a kente cloth with the rest of her Democrat colleagues. Now go search google for a photo-op. 1) check what they refer to Trumps' photo-op as. Now check what they refer to Nanci Pelosis' photo-op as. (if they mention it). Controlling the Narrative. brought to you by China communist and Democrat party Media. Good luck to all in country with a one party rule without a free or objective press. #votinghasconsequences.
Sanctions are now increasingly used by Trump Administration to throttle China. But I am worrying that more sanctions, hostility and isolation will further stoke discontent and nationalism among Chinese people, which is in fact a fundamental reason of the "wolf warrior" appraoch. It may underminine regional peace and stability.
Do you really think that world need to do anything to stroke nationalism among Chinese? No matter what the world does the Chinese people will be manipulated by the state media and government.
I think everyone in the world, including people living in Mainland China, has to realize that the main problem is coming from just the Communists Party. I cannot think of there is such a law that would be passed and enforced - think when you just say "I hate Communists Party" on the street and you will be in prison for rest of your life. The Communists Party is governing the country via threatening their citizens, and their citizens will never be trusted by their government - that's why there is no democratic voting system in China. And now they are trying to spread this to the rest of the world - be warned that Comintern is now back. We shall all ally together, or we will never be able to live our own lives in a short future. Sanctions could be an option, but being able to allow all people living in Mainland China to know the reality is more important.
Nothing unusual. The west has expected China to be submissive and speak with a Softly voice always subservient to the demand of Washington and its allies especially the G7. That period is over. Does China needs the world? Like the US it is a continental economy. It can produce most of what it needs itself. It does not a aspire to be a dominant world power, prefer the US as the TOP power. But compete it will, because that is the only route to the survival of the Chinese, not to dominate and conquer.
US should initiate 2 new strategies. One - form a global NATO to include Japan - South Korea - Australia . This will counter China's expanding global reach and add additional resources. China's advantaged today is a fragmented west. Two form a US -EU economic union. This would form an economic entity that is approximately 50 % of the world GDP. China would have to respect this economic bloc and begin to engage in free market policies or suffer the economic consequences. To day the status quo is advantage - China Ed Houlihan Ridgewood, NJ 07450 edmho@yahoo.com
I think China is underestimating the collective mood of the populace of many nations, mainly the United States, Canada, Australia, Europe, India and South East Asian countries. Put together these represent all the major economies of the world minus South America and Africa. The implications cannot be measured, but will play out over time. Corporations, small businesses and people have already started looking for alternative markets and manufacturing from China. This has to be seen to be believed. I personally, wherever possible, having been sourcing products that are not made in China. I will not stop. But there are many more like myself. I will not reward China for it's misgivings. SARS, Asian flu, Coronavirus and the misinformation that comes with it from China is unfortunate. But I think like many people, we are now officially done with China. Expansion of supply chains is needed. Many countries would benefit: Thailand, Vietnam, Indonesia, India, Brazil and Mexico come to mind. The time has come. It will be slow, but the economic opportunities will be immense for all involved.
"Be in prison the rest of your life"? Bruhhh, the communist party has way less power than y'all are falsely imagining. And you really think there is any way the communist party can monitor a random person's speech? There are 1.4 billion people there, you do the math. Furthermore, there are plenty of people who speak ill of the communist party and it's super normal, and nobody - absolutely nobody goes to jail for that sh*t. And for the commentator who replied to this comment before me - Smith, it's obvious you have an unhealthy amount of anti-chinese sentiment. If y'all's whole perception of China is based upon western media's manipulation, I suggest you to think twice before spreading trashy opinions.
The COVID-19 pandemic casts brilliant light on deficiencies in all aspects of each country's political, economic and social landscapes. Under its present "leadership" the US demonstrates a dangerous lack of discipline and cohesion, as well as deep societal rifts and inequalities. It does not demonstrate the qualities or leadership that we need to protect our independence and personal freedoms from China's authoritarian rule. It is logical for China to take aggressive advantage of these fatal capitalistic (and constitutional?) flaws with their "authoritarian efficiency". The globalisation experiment falters in the face of China's and the US's win-lose nationalistic approaches and like-minded countries need to unite and step up.
The article is comprehensive and provides all relevant information. There should have been some historical background for Chinese expansionist policy. Is it Chinese economic power is responsible? This fact has not strongly emerged.
The obvious Chinese policy is 100% monetary. China uses it’s vast financial resources to enrich and basically bribe government leaders (Nepal, Philippines, Africa) and multi-national corporations (Apple, Microsoft, Nike...) to abide to their nefarious goals of global domination. Unfortunately, this policy has created a toxic Worldwide crisis of “income inequality” and this will eventually destabilize most governments and lead to unrest. As history has shown us time after time, the working lower classes will not tolerate repression for very long while their oppressors sit on a mountain of gold. The standard policy of China is to entice global manufacturers and tech companies to move into Their cheap labor market and then steal their processes and create a cloned competing business. The Nations of the World have unwittingly allowed their national businesses and resources to become ensnared in China’s web! Elon Musk moving Tesla into China is a poor decision.
First of all,I can't stand in the same lineup with the opinion provided from this article,you said that the Chinese people are monitored and controlled by the government,come on dudes,ya'll know it ain't true,have you ever been to China?The nationalism is not and never will be evoked for the pressure worldwide,I deeply believe it's a rooted mind for every Chinese people since they're kids.Beside,it's so ignominious to twist the truth on the internet by fabricate a mass of untrue information about China.The reason why White house and European countries scare of China and outspoken the development they made was undermining the international order is that the clash of races and cultures.
Finally someone who gets it.
It's always so interesting (and expected) to see the Chinese party responses in comment sections of any Western online article critical of China, Xi, or the CCP. Usually syntax, grammar, stilted use of English and a blatant defensiveness and cheerleading of China was the norm (often laughably coupled with a screen name like "Average American"). Now, it has become more sophisticated (but even more ridiculous) with what we see here: millennial slang, Southern slang, Victorian syntax, uncommon usage of rarely used words, etc. intermingled. They are getting better and have a long ways to go, but I doubt they will ever fool anyone.
Comment Policy
Comments that include profanity, personal attacks, or other inappropriate material will be removed. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, steps will be taken to block users who violate any of the posting standards, terms of use, privacy policies, or any other policies governing this site. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.