The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.
Tong Zhao
{
"authors": [],
"type": "pressRelease",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "NPP",
"programs": [
"Nuclear Policy"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [],
"topics": [
"Nuclear Policy"
]
}REQUIRED IMAGE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 21, 2007
- NEWS RELEASE -
WASHINGTON, Aug 21—An unprecedented gathering of 800 nonproliferation experts from 33 countries has identified ten key priorities for the nonproliferation regime, providing specific recommendations for international agencies; the business community; and the United States, EU, and Russia.
The Top Ten Results from the 2007 Carnegie International Nonproliferation Conference identifies the three most critical challenges to the nonproliferation regime, the three best new policy proposals, and the four most important policies to implement by 2010.
The ten priorities are a result of the June 2007 Carnegie International Nonproliferation Conference, sponsored by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, that brought together U.S. and foreign government officials, policy and technical experts, academics, and journalists, as well as representatives from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United Nations, and the European Union to exchange ideas on the most urgent nonproliferation topics.
Top Three Challenges to the Nonproliferation regime:
Top Three Best New Policy Proposals:
Top Four High Impact Ideas to Implement by 2010:
###
Notes:
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.
Tong Zhao
A look at why states without nuclear weapons are seeking naval nuclear propulsion, whether they can legally and technically deliver it, what it will cost them, and what responsible stewardship of the capability would look like.
Jamie Kwong
Congress should ask tough questions about the agreement’s more unique features and whether they advance U.S. interests or compromise them.
Jane Darby Menton
Nuclear and maritime communities face a long and challenging journey to deploy commercial nuclear applications at sea.
Jamie Kwong, Toby Dalton
A look at how public opinion influences the credibility of coercive nuclear threats,and how it enables and constrains strategies of nuclear coercion.
Lauren Sukin, Samuel Seitz