China's Military Space Strategy: An Exchange

{
  "authors": [
    "Ashley J. Tellis",
    "Michael Krepon"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "China"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Military",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ]
}

In The Media

China's Military Space Strategy: An Exchange

In the autumn 2007 issue of Survival, Ashley J. Tellis argues that China’s recent anti-satellite weapons test was part of a considered strategy designed to counter the overall military capability of the United States, and that "the United States has no choice but to run an offense–defense arms race, and win."

By Ashley J. Tellis and Michael Krepon

Published on Feb 1, 2008

Source: From Survival

In the autumn 2007 issue of Survival, Ashley J. Tellis of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace argued that China’s recent anti-satellite weapons test was part of a considered strategy designed to counter the overall military capability of the United States, and that "the United States has no choice but to run an offence–defence arms race, and win." The article stimulated a large number of responses, and Survival invited a selection of those who responded, and some other experts, to elaborate on their views. Comments from Michael Krepon, Eric Hagt, Shen Dingli, Bao Shixiu and Michael Pillsbury, and a response from Tellis, follow.

The full text of the article, in PDF format, is available in the right sidebar.

About the Authors

Ashley J. Tellis

Former Senior Fellow

Ashley J. Tellis was a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Michael Krepon

Military Foreign Policy Nuclear Policy China

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Commentary
Emissary
Who Will Be Iran’s Next Supreme Leader?
If the succession process can be carried out as Khamenei intended, it will likely bring a hardliner into power.
Eric Lob
Commentary
Emissary
Turkey Has Two Key Interests in the Iran Conflict
But to achieve either, it needs to retain Washington’s ear.
Alper Coşkun
Commentary
Carnegie Politika
What Does War in the Middle East Mean for Russia–Iran Ties?
If the regime in Tehran survives, it could be obliged to hand Moscow significant political influence in exchange for supplies of weapons and humanitarian aid.
Nikita Smagin
Commentary
Emissary
Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.
Just look at Iraq in 1991.
Marwan Muasher
Commentary
Strategic Europe
Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not Less
Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.
Dimitar Bechev

China's Military Space Strategy: An Exchange

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Crowds holding Iranian flags and photos of the late Khamenei

Commentary

Emissary

Who Will Be Iran’s Next Supreme Leader?

If the succession process can be carried out as Khamenei intended, it will likely bring a hardliner into power.

Eric Lob

A missile tail embedded in the ground in an open field with green ground cover and a blue sky.

Commentary

Emissary

Turkey Has Two Key Interests in the Iran Conflict

But to achieve either, it needs to retain Washington’s ear.

Alper Coşkun

Commentary

Carnegie Politika

What Does War in the Middle East Mean for Russia–Iran Ties?

If the regime in Tehran survives, it could be obliged to hand Moscow significant political influence in exchange for supplies of weapons and humanitarian aid.

Nikita Smagin

people watching smoke rising at sunrise from rooftops

Commentary

Emissary

Bombing Campaigns Do Not Bring About Democracy. Nor Does Regime Change Without a Plan.

Just look at Iraq in 1991.

Marwan Muasher

Commentary

Strategic Europe

Global Instability Makes Europe More Attractive, Not Less

Europe isn’t as weak in the new geopolitics of power as many would believe. But to leverage its assets and claim a sphere of influence, Brussels must stop undercutting itself.

Dimitar Bechev