Douglas H. Paal
{
"authors": [
"Douglas H. Paal"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie China",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"South Asia",
"India",
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform",
"Security",
"Military",
"Domestic Politics"
]
}Source: Getty
Global Insider: China-India Border Disputes
While India has recently adopted a more conciliatory attitude in trying to resolve its long-standing border disputes with China, it remains to be seen whether this diplomatic cooperation will continue.
Source: World Politics Review

WPR: What are the core unresolved issues regarding the India-China border?
Douglas Paal: The principal disputes are over territory. The Sino-Indian territorial dispute is one of China's few remaining border disputes after a decade of resolving tough disputes with 11 other important neighbors. At the western end of the Sino-Indian border lies Aksai-Chin, which China conquered in the 1962 border war with India. This high, flat plateau embraces the only road connection between Tibet and far-western Xinjiang near the border, and is viewed by China as a strategic requirement. In the east, the dispute is over Arunachal Pradesh, controlled by India. Observers have long expected that a swap of these two territories would end their dispute and allow the border to be settled. But the political atmosphere has not been right at the same time in both capitals to do so since the 1962 war.
WPR: What explains the heightened Chinese activity there (i.e., provocative intrusions and military infrastructure development) over the past year, and what considerations are guiding the Indian response (i.e., restraint on the intrusions while hardening its side of the border)?
Paal: The question assumes that there have been higher incidents of Chinese provocation, as alleged commonly in India's media. Chinese and foreign observers who have visited the Indian border area from China, however, have not supported these allegations. It would be interesting to know the truth.
WPR: What impact has this had on bilateral relations, and are there any mechanisms in place to prevent it from becoming a flashpoint?
Paal: Interestingly, India has shown creative diplomacy in recent months, seeking to defuse the rising tensions. Delhi sent a new ambassador to Beijing -- an expert on relations with the United States, S. Jaishankar -- to find some means of resolving Sino-Indian disputes. An early fruit of his efforts is an agreement for the first joint exercise between the two countries' militaries since 1962. It remains to be seen whether this will develop into a pattern of diplomatic cooperation that institutionalizes itself.
About the Author
Distinguished Fellow, Asia Program
Paal previously served as vice chairman of JPMorgan Chase International and as unofficial U.S. representative to Taiwan as director of the American Institute in Taiwan.
- America’s Future in a Dynamic AsiaPaper
- U.S.-China Relations at the Forty-Year MarkQ&A
- +1
Douglas H. Paal, Tong Zhao, Chen Qi, …
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- One Year After the Great Aid Recession, Investments in Climate Mobility Offer Cost-Effective ReturnsCommentary
Climate mobility interventions can vary, but they all present opportunities to unlock transformative results that mitigate costs associated with inaction.
Alejandro Martin Rodriguez
- The Myriad Problems With the Iran CeasefireCommentary
Four Middle East experts analyze the region’s reactions and next steps.
- +1
Amr Hamzawy, Andrew Leber, Eric Lob, …
- The Iran War’s Global ReachCollection
As the war between the United States, Israel, and Iran continues, Carnegie scholars contribute cutting-edge analysis on the events of the war and their wide-reaching implications. From the impact on Iran and its immediate neighbors to the responses from Gulf states to fuel and fertilizer shortages caused by the effective shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz, the war is reshaping Middle East alliances and creating shockwaves around the world. Carnegie experts analyze it all.
- Amid Iran War, Gulf Countries Slow the Pace of ReformsArticle
The return of war as the organizing factor in Middle Eastern politics has predictable consequences: governments are prioritizing regime stability and becoming averse to political and social reform.
Sarah Yerkes, Amr Hamzawy
- Taking the Pulse: Can NATO Survive the Iran War?Commentary
Donald Trump has repeatedly bashed NATO and European allies, threatening to annex Canada and Greenland and deploring their lack of enthusiasm for his war of choice in Iran. Is this latest round of abuse the final straw?
Rym Momtaz, ed.