Commentary
As the monarchy appears to question its grandest projects, the state could do with more critical debate than rote cheerleading.
Andrew Leber
{
"authors": [
"Hans Timmer",
"Uri Dadush"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "",
"programs": [],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Western Europe",
"North America"
],
"topics": [
"Economy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
Lessons for Policymakers
Policymakers must realize that the world has changed with the deep crisis in the advanced countries and everyone has to adapt to that.
Published on Dec 15, 2011
What lessons can policymakers take from the crisis?
One lesson is the realization that the world has changed with the deep crisis in the advanced countries and everyone has to adapt to that. These are the kind of crises that really reshape the world—the global economy will never be the same again. The economic relationships have changed. That was a gradual process, but the crisis really brings the point home and accelerates the transformation.
This change has consequences. Businesses and policymakers will need some time to adjust to this. In the coming years, the main question for leading companies in high-income countries will be how to compete with globalizing companies from emerging markets.
This change has consequences. Businesses and policymakers will need some time to adjust to this. In the coming years, the main question for leading companies in high-income countries will be how to compete with globalizing companies from emerging markets.
Read more
Emerging countries will need to find their voice and play a more assertive role. They have always been in the position to react to proposals, but they will increasingly need to come up with global solutions themselves.
There is still a reluctance to fully accept the fact that the world is bigger now and there are more seats needed at the table of global governance. It is healthy that emerging markets have increasing influence and global governing bodies should change to reflect this.
The second lesson is that there are enormous vulnerabilities in the integrated financial system and the world lacks the governing system to keep this under control. Ultimately this is an example where institutions are running far behind the actual economy. They need to catch up. We need better global governance and Europe is the perfect example.
Instead of pulling back and thinking that governments need to leave it to the markets, the solution is to fix the governance issues.
And finally, high-income countries are in envy of the success of emerging markets and they try to understand what makes them so successful. Part of that success is just that developing countries are catching up, but part of it is also that there is better focus on long-term strategies in emerging economies. This is something that is missing in high-income countries today.
We have confirmed that fiscal stimulus and monetary stimulus are needed in times of crisis. By acting promptly and avoiding protectionism stimulus helped the world to avoid a depression a few years ago. But we have also learned that once you have the fiscal stimulus, withdrawing the fiscal stimulus is very hard.
Fiscal stimulus is meant to be timely, temporary, and targeted. This means it’s easier to have automatic stabilizers or enough safety nets built into the system. When the economy slows this kind of spending increases automatically, and when economic growth accelerates again there is a gradual withdrawal. Unfortunately, this is not the case in the United States—all of the decisions are held hostage to the politics of the day.
Finally, in my view the crisis has confirmed the importance of flexible exchange rates. The European crisis has shown that if countries are going to fix their exchange rates they need to do many other things to support the system. MORE►
————————
Hans Timmer is the director of the World Bank's development prospects group.
There is still a reluctance to fully accept the fact that the world is bigger now and there are more seats needed at the table of global governance. It is healthy that emerging markets have increasing influence and global governing bodies should change to reflect this.
The second lesson is that there are enormous vulnerabilities in the integrated financial system and the world lacks the governing system to keep this under control. Ultimately this is an example where institutions are running far behind the actual economy. They need to catch up. We need better global governance and Europe is the perfect example.
Instead of pulling back and thinking that governments need to leave it to the markets, the solution is to fix the governance issues.
And finally, high-income countries are in envy of the success of emerging markets and they try to understand what makes them so successful. Part of that success is just that developing countries are catching up, but part of it is also that there is better focus on long-term strategies in emerging economies. This is something that is missing in high-income countries today.
We have confirmed that fiscal stimulus and monetary stimulus are needed in times of crisis. By acting promptly and avoiding protectionism stimulus helped the world to avoid a depression a few years ago. But we have also learned that once you have the fiscal stimulus, withdrawing the fiscal stimulus is very hard.
Fiscal stimulus is meant to be timely, temporary, and targeted. This means it’s easier to have automatic stabilizers or enough safety nets built into the system. When the economy slows this kind of spending increases automatically, and when economic growth accelerates again there is a gradual withdrawal. Unfortunately, this is not the case in the United States—all of the decisions are held hostage to the politics of the day.
Finally, in my view the crisis has confirmed the importance of flexible exchange rates. The European crisis has shown that if countries are going to fix their exchange rates they need to do many other things to support the system. MORE►
————————
Hans Timmer is the director of the World Bank's development prospects group.
About the Authors
Hans Timmer
Uri Dadush
Former Senior Associate, International Economics Program
Dadush was a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. He focuses on trends in the global economy and is currently tracking developments in the eurozone crisis.
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- The Iran War Isn’t the Only Challenge Facing Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030
- From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East AsiaArticle
The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang
- Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI CompetitionArticle
In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee
- Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?Commentary
China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.
Michael Pettis
- India’s Press Note 3 Gamble: Opening the FDI Door to ChinaArticle
On March 10, 2026, India’s Union Cabinet approved amendments to Press Note 3, a regulation that mandated government approval on all foreign direct investment (FDI) from countries sharing a land border with India. This amendment raises questions primarily about whether its stated benefits will materialize and if the risks have been adequately weighed. This piece will address the same.
Konark Bhandari
