• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Moisés Naím"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "United States"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Climate Change"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil has managed to thrive in an industry fraught with risk and to thwart those who might oppose its interests at nearly every turn.

Link Copied
By Moisés Naím
Published on May 29, 2012

Source: El País

ExxonMobil -- with revenues of about $450 billion (yes, $450 billion) – displaced WalMart as the world’s largest company. Most countries do not have annual incomes of that magnitude. Steve Coll, an elegant writer and dogged investigative reporter just published a book on which he had been working for years: Private Empire. The book shows how in the 1990s, ExxonMobil – which already was a huge company – laid the foundations that enabled it to becoming the dominant giant that it now is.

Coll specializes in prying open closed institutions. His two previous books scrutinized the conduct of the CIA in Afghanistan, and the Bin Laden family. “Reporting on Exxon was not only more difficult than reporting on the Bin Ladens, it was harder than reporting on the CIA,” he says. “They have a culture of intimidation […]; they make people nervous and afraid.” Exxon Mobil has met its match in a tenacious, intelligent reporter who isn’t easily scared. Coll traveled the world, met more than 400 people, obtained secret documents and seems to have read everything available in libraries, archives, courts and news media on the company and the institutions with which it interacts. This effort has produced a thriller-like story that reveals a fascinating interplay of power, money and politics at the highest international levels, where the stakes are stratospheric.

The essence of the story is that the business of ExxonMobil – the finding, extraction and sale of oil and gas – is hugely expensive and risky. It requires immense investments that bear fruit only in the long term. “Exxon’s investments in a particular oil field could be premised on a production life span of 40 or more years,” Coll writes. “During that time the United States might change its president and its foreign and energy policies at least half a dozen times. Overseas it is even worse: coups d’état, revolutions and violence cause more frequent and drastic changes. Its enormous expenditures and long recovery period make its investments highly vulnerable to such volatility.”

In the heady 1990s the world market was transformed. After the fall of the Soviet Union, many previously closed countries opened their doors to foreign investment. Asia, and China and India in particular, began an upsurge that spurred on the global economy. At the same time, the world became aware of the environmental damage produced by fossil fuels, while terrorism and wars proliferated alongside all sorts of political and financial convulsions.

How can a powerful company elude and control this volatility, and even profit from it? ExxonMobil did so, and with great success, in the hands of a charismatic leader, Lee “Iron Ass” Raymond, the CEO who led the company from 1993 to 2005. The book documents the exceptional capacities this firm developed for minimizing the impact of changing times, and in blocking initiatives by governments, rival firms and organizations that threatened its interests.

The oil giant has, for example, been very effective in limiting the success of the scientists and activists who are fighting to diminish the carbon emissions that cause global warming. It has contended with guerrillas in Indonesia; with Arab sheikhs and with strongmen like Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chávez and Teodoro Obiang. But above all, it knows how to handle the US government, especially its Congress.

“The corporation’s lobbyists bent and shaped American foreign policy,” writes Coll, “as well as economic, climate, chemical and environmental regulations.” As the company internationalized, its links with the US got weaker. “Exxon’s far-flung interests were at times different from Washington’s. Raymond did not manage the corporation as a subordinate instrument of US foreign policy; his was a private empire.” Raymond himself put it more bluntly: “I am not a US company, and I don’t make decisions based on what is good for the US.” “Compromise was not Exxon’s way,” Coll wryly remarks at one point.

In an interview, Coll offers one of his most revealing opinions: “ExxonMobil does follow the law, I think. I’m really persuaded that they always stay inside the lines.” Though he doesn’t say it in so many words, his book shows how easy it can be for a company to stay inside the lines, when it draws them itself.

This article originally appeared in El País.

About the Author

Moisés Naím

Distinguished Fellow

Moisés Naím is a distinguished fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a best-selling author, and an internationally syndicated columnist.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    The World Reacts to Biden’s First 100 Days
      • +10

      Rosa Balfour, Frances Z. Brown, Yasmine Farouk, …

  • Commentary
    View From Latin America

      Moisés Naím

Moisés Naím
Distinguished Fellow
Moisés Naím
EconomyClimate ChangeNorth AmericaUnited States

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russia’s Elite Conflict Over Internet Restrictions Does Not Herald Regime Collapse

    A much-discussed disagreement over internet restrictions in Russia was never an existential threat for Putin: It was about elite groups protecting their interests.  

      Alexandra Prokopenko

  • Commentary
    Diwan
    Israel’s Security Means Insecurity in the Middle East

    As negotiations with Iran and Lebanon continue, chaos is at the heart of the Netanyahu government’s calculations.

      Michael Young

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Are Western Democracies Failing Free Speech?

    The battle over free speech has taken center stage since U.S. Vice President JD Vance accused Europe of censorship. From travel bans to social media regulation, especially around the Israel-Palestine conflict, are liberal democratic governments weaponizing free speech?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Trump and Bessent sitting next to each other
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump’s AI Order Won’t Stymie U.S. Competition with China

    Beijing regulated AI—and then Chinese AI companies took off.

      Matt Sheehan

  • Aerial view of large data center buildings next to single-family houses
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Are Data Centers the Villains in the Battle Over Electricity?

    Examples from Virginia and Lake Tahoe reveal complex situations that governments could use to fund critical grid upgrades.

      • Noah  Gordon ​​​​

      Kate Gordon, Noah Gordon

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.