• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Frederic Wehrey"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [
    "Arab Awakening"
  ],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "menaTransitions",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "MEP",
  "programs": [
    "Middle East"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North Africa",
    "Libya"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Democracy",
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy",
    "Civil Society"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media

Libya Needs Greater Aid, Not a Retreat, From the United States and Its Allies

As Libya faces its greatest political crisis since the 2011 revolution, now is the time for greater assistance from the United States and Libya’s Western allies.

Link Copied
By Frederic Wehrey
Published on May 16, 2013
Program mobile hero image

Program

Middle East

The Middle East Program in Washington combines in-depth regional knowledge with incisive comparative analysis to provide deeply informed recommendations. With expertise in the Gulf, North Africa, Iran, and Israel/Palestine, we examine crosscutting themes of political, economic, and social change in both English and Arabic.

Learn More

Source: Washington Post

While many Americans have been riveted by recent congressional testimony and debate about the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, this country has been caught in its own drama.

In recent days, amid Libya’s worst political crisis since the 2011 revolution that toppled Moammar Gaddafi, the United States and other Western governments have evacuated their diplomatic staff. A Marine quick-response team and a Special Operations unit were placed on alert. But this is precisely the time for greater engagement, not retreat, not only with Libya’s beleaguered government but also with its increasingly assertive civil society. Engagement is crucial for securing Libya’s future and preventing its weakness from inflaming conflicts in North Africa and the Middle East.

Over the past two weeks, armed militias have laid siege to government ministries in the capital, Tripoli, demanding that the elected parliament pass a controversial law that would bar a range of officials who served in the Gaddafi regime from government employment. Effectively held at gunpoint, legislators passed the bill last week, but the siege continued until this past weekend, with militias encamped at the ministries and demanding the ouster of Prime Minister Ali Zeidan and his cabinet. “A slow-motion coup” was how one Libyan described the standoff to me. Meanwhile, an explosion Monday in front of a Benghazi hospital killed three, sparking outrage across Libya at the ongoing security vacuum in the city.

In nearly every crisis in Libya since 2011, civil society has helped pull the country back from the brink. Last Friday, thousands of Libyans marched toward the besieged Foreign Ministry to confront the armed militias. Those I spoke with said they were marching for the principles of due process and democracy. True, many disagreed with the government, its corruption and its inefficiency. But their signs and banners bore witness to the idea that changes in government should come through legal, peaceful means, not by armed intimidation. By late Friday evening, the militias had fled; by Saturday night, the ministries had returned to business.

In the wake of the violence in Benghazi, there have been similar displays of outrage, with citizens demanding that the government replace the militia groups in the city with formal police and army troops. It was a stunning display of people power, reminiscent of the demonstrations by civilians who stormed the militia headquarters in Benghazi in September after the death of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three of his colleagues. On Thursday, the government heeded these calls, sending in special forces to shut down a notorious arms market in the city and deploying troops along its major roads.

But civil society alone cannot succeed against the enormous challenges facing this country. Most crucially, the “political isolation law” is polarizing society and impeding progress on many fronts. At one level, the law reflects deep-rooted questions about whether the countless bureaucrats and technocrats who served in Gaddafi’s machine — even if they personally committed no crimes — should be allowed to remain in their posts. On another level, it is a disturbing political game: a bid by Islamist elements and politicians and the powerful city-state of Misurata to force the hand of the elected government. The law’s passage by force set a dangerous template for armed intimidation that other disgruntled factions could try to emulate.

In the midst of this gridlock, Libya’s porous southern borders have become thoroughfares for smugglers, illegal migrants and jihadists. Arms from Libya are fueling conflicts in Mali, Gaza and Syria. The regular army and police remain hollow shells, while the various militia coalitions, although nominally under government control, are the real arbiters of power.

For many Libyans, there is gnawing disenchantment with the pace of progress and even hints of nostalgia for the old order. Added to this, many are disheartened by the retreat of Western governments and companies. While an ultimate resolution of the political crisis rests with decision-makers and civil society, outsiders can do much more. A potential window is closing. Now is the time for greater assistance from the United States and Libya’s Western allies.

This article was originally published in the Washington Post.

About the Author

Frederic Wehrey

Senior Fellow, Middle East Program

Frederic Wehrey is a senior fellow in the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where his research focuses on governance, conflict, and security in Libya, North Africa, and the Persian Gulf.

    Recent Work

  • Research
    Russia in Africa: Examining Moscow’s Influence and Its Limits
      • Nate Reynolds
      • +11

      Frances Z. Brown, Nate Reynolds, Priyal Singh, …

  • Commentary
    How the Flaws of Trump’s Gaza Deal Prevent an Enduring Peace

      Charles H. Johnson, Frederic Wehrey

Frederic Wehrey
Senior Fellow, Middle East Program
Frederic Wehrey
DemocracySecurityForeign PolicyCivil SocietyNorth AfricaLibya

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Is the EU Ready for Rapprochement With the UK?

    Closer EU-UK ties could help address urgent European concerns. But is the EU ready for rapprochement with the United Kingdom?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Who Is Responsible for the Demise of the Russian Internet?

    The Russian state has opted for complete ideological control of the internet and is prepared to bear the associated costs.

      Maria Kolomychenko

  • Duterte stands with his fist raised and a crowd of people stand behind him
    Paper
    Duterte’s Populist Foreign Policy as Illiberal Defiance: Consequences and Prospects

    In the Philippines, Duterte-era discourse emphasizing sovereignty, anti-Western skepticism, and strongman diplomacy mirrors tenets of populist foreign policy around the world.

      Aries A. Arugay

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    France, Italy, and Spain Should Use Force in Lebanon

    Europe has been standing by while its Southern neighborhood is being redrawn by force. To establish a path to peace between Israel and Lebanon, it’s time for Europeans to get involved with hard power.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Is Opposition to Online Restrictions an Inflection Point for the Russian Regime?

    After four years of war, there is no one who can stand up to the security establishment, and President Vladimir Putin is increasingly passive. 

      Tatiana Stanovaya

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.