• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "C. Raja Mohan"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "SAP",
  "programs": [
    "South Asia"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "India",
    "Afghanistan",
    "Pakistan"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Security",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

Karzai in Pak

Delhi must engage all forces in Afghanistan and focus on insulating India from the negative consequences of the new phase that has begun to unfold on India's northwestern frontiers.

Link Copied
By C. Raja Mohan
Published on Aug 28, 2013
Program mobile hero image

Program

South Asia

The South Asia Program informs policy debates relating to the region’s security, economy, and political development. From strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific to India’s internal dynamics and U.S. engagement with the region, the program offers in-depth, rigorous research and analysis on South Asia’s most critical challenges.

Learn More

Source: Indian Express

"It is Hamid Karzai's 20th mistake," a sceptical newspaper in Kabul declared as the Afghan president embarked on his 20th trip to Pakistan this week. Since he became president in 2002, Karzai has been acutely conscious of the fact that Pakistan is the single most important external factor shaping the prospects for reconciliation, peace and economic progress in Afghanistan.

The U.S. might have the money and muscle, but it can't stay in Afghanistan forever. Geography, in the form of an open border of 2,500 km, has given Pakistan an enduring influence in Afghanistan. As the Taliban insurgency regained momentum since 2004, Karzai argued that the international community must focus on the militant sanctuaries in Pakistan. No counter-insurgency in the world, after all, has succeeded when a neighbouring country supports those fighting the legitimate government next door.

Although he constantly complained about the destabilisation of Afghanistan from across the Durand Line, Karzai had to perforce seek a political accommodation with Pakistan. He, however, has little leverage to persuade the Pakistan army to change its Afghan policy. The contradictions between the interests of Afghanistan and those of the Pakistan army are real and not easy to overcome. Rawalpindi wants a weak Afghan state and Karzai wants to build a strong republic. The Pakistan army seeks extra-territorial influence in Afghanistan by reinstalling the Taliban in Kabul. Karzai is open to a reasonable settlement in which the insurgency joins the mainstream within the framework of the current Afghan constitution. The Taliban, however, is reluctant to engage Kabul.

From a practical perspective, Pakistan has little incentive to make nice to Karzai. The Taliban insurgency has gained ground in the southern and eastern provinces bordering Pakistan in the last few years. The U.S. is all set to end its combat role in Afghanistan by the end of 2014. Meanwhile, Karzai's second term as president comes to an end early next year.

Sharif's Policy

The Afghan president, despite his weak hand, can't really stop the engagement with Pakistan and could not decline the invitation for talks from the newly elected leader, Nawaz Sharif. At a news conference before leaving Kabul on Monday, Karzai praised Sharif for having "all the right intentions for stability and peace", but was not sure if Sharif could deliver the Taliban to the negotiating table. When Sharif's top adviser on foreign policy, Sartaj Aziz, travelled to Kabul a few weeks ago to invite Karzai to Islamabad, the Afghan president sought to set some preconditions for his visit, especially on Pakistan's support for peace talks with the Taliban. There has been no indication that those terms had been met.

Karzai's decision to extend his stay in Islamabad by a day has been widely interpreted as a sign of some progress in his talks with Sharif. His emphasis was on the need for a joint fight by the two countries against extremist violence and the importance of Pakistan persuading the Taliban to join the reconciliation process.

Sharif said all the right things about backing an "Afghan-owned and Afghan-led peace process", but there was no public indication as to whether he has met any of the items on Karzai's agenda. The next few weeks will show if Sharif can match his words with deeds. Kabul has long been convi-nced that the war in Afghanistan can come to an end within weeks if Rawalpindi so desired. Optimists would say Sharif might be strong enough to define a new approach to Afghanistan. Pessimists would demur and say the Pakistan army will never cede control over Afghan policy to the civilians.

India's role

Whatever happens between Kabul and Rawalpindi, India has no reason to get too anxious. Despite much hype about India-Pakistan rivalry in Afghanistan, their roles in the latter have never been symmetric. New Delhi has no reason to see itself in competition with Rawalpindi in Afghanistan. It is quite conscious of the limitations imposed by geography. Realists in Delhi are aware that Kabul and Islamabad will take long to make sense of their mutual vulnerabilities and resolve their fundamental contradictions. Delhi, then, must engage all forces in Afghanistan and focus on insulating India from the negative consequences of the new phase that has begun to unfold on India's northwestern frontiers. If Delhi holds its nerve and plays well the few cards it has, India could yet have some impact on the evolution of the Af-Pak dynamic.

This article was originally published in the Indian Express.

About the Author

C. Raja Mohan

Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India

A leading analyst of India’s foreign policy, Mohan is also an expert on South Asian security, great-power relations in Asia, and arms control.

    Recent Work

  • Article
    Deepening the India-France Maritime Partnership

      C. Raja Mohan, Darshana M. Baruah

  • Commentary
    Shanghai Cooperation Organization at Crossroads: Views From Moscow, Beijing and New Delhi
      • Alexander Gabuev
      • +1

      Alexander Gabuev, Paul Haenle, C. Raja Mohan, …

C. Raja Mohan
Former Nonresident Senior Fellow, Carnegie India
SecurityForeign PolicySouth AsiaIndiaAfghanistanPakistan

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Carnegie Politika
    Russian Indoctrination in Occupied Ukrainian Schools Is a Sham

    Despite a new textbook, an influx of Russian teachers and managers, and an end to the teaching of Ukrainian, the Kremlin is unlikely to have “reprogrammed” locals.

      Konstantin Skorkin

  • Satellite in space
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The U.S. Has Weapons in Space. Now What?

    The acknowledgment has sparked fears of a new arms race with China and Russia.

      • Chris  O'Meara ​​​​

      Chris O’Meara

  • Blue Water Bridge with Flags of USA and Canada
    Paper
    What Canada Knows About American Power

    Smaller powers cannot go it alone, but Canadian history shows that integration with the United States will not always be benign.

      Paul Samson

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Can the EU Stare Down China on Trade?

    The European Commissioner for Trade is headed to China. But after President Xi’s bridge-building visit to Washington, can a more isolated EU overcome Beijing’s stranglehold on critical raw materials? Who will blink first?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • Trump holding a glass of champagne up in a toast, with a table of guests in the foreground
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Trump Had the Chance to Address U.S.-China AI Safety. He Threw Xi a Party Instead.

    The summit may be remembered as a fatal blunder, when Washington, Beijing, and the AI industry collectively chose ceremony over action.

      • Jeffrey Prescott

      Jeffrey Prescott

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.