• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Togzhan Kassenova"
  ],
  "type": "other",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
  "programAffiliation": "NPP",
  "programs": [
    "Nuclear Policy"
  ],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "North America",
    "South America"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Nuclear Policy",
    "Arms Control",
    "Nuclear Energy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

Other

Brazil and the Global Nuclear Order

Brazil faces the paradox of criticizing the unfairness of the nuclear order while attempting to carve out a role for itself in it.

Link Copied
By Togzhan Kassenova
Published on Apr 16, 2015
Program mobile hero image

Program

Nuclear Policy

The Nuclear Policy Program aims to reduce the risk of nuclear war. Our experts diagnose acute risks stemming from technical and geopolitical developments, generate pragmatic solutions, and use our global network to advance risk-reduction policies. Our work covers deterrence, disarmament, arms control, nonproliferation, and nuclear energy.

Learn More

Source: Palgrave Macmillan

Brazil’s views on the global nuclear order are informed by the sentiment of distrust towards technologically advanced countries that in the past have sought to deny countries like Brazil access to nuclear technology. Brazil sees the global nuclear order as a reflection of the world order: unfair and antiquated. In the nuclear realm Brazil pursues a strategy similar to its strategy in the fields of multilateral trade, finance, and world governance more broadly. Brazil pushes for greater representation of developing countries in structures like the WTO, World Bank, IMF, and the UN Security Council. While Brazil calls for greater democratization of these institutions, it is ready to accept that they might not evolve to a sufficient degree and in that case, Brazil is keen to be among the power brokers.

Brazil’s nuclear policy-making reveals that occasionally the country’s inclination to be seen as being on higher moral ground conflicts with its immediate national interests. Brazil places high value on multilateralism, international institutions and norms, but practical considerations coupled with a general sense of disillusionment with the global nuclear order have pushed it to adopt policies that meet its immediate interests. Brazil’s reticence to join the NPT, adhere to the Tlatelolco Treaty, and sign the IAEA Additional Protocol are among the examples of this tension in Brazil’s nuclear identity.

Speaking about the sense of disillusionment with the global nuclear order, countries like Brazil are growing increasingly assertive in questioning the current status quo; and tensions between established and emerging powers on questions of nuclear disarmament, nonproliferation and nuclear energy have become more pronounced. These tensions are not new, but they are becoming harder to ignore. In the past, established nuclear powers could more easily dismiss complaints from non-nuclear states about the lopsided order, but the non-nuclear states have gradually become more active and vocal, pushing the order to evolve and making outright dismissal of their demands more difficult.

Brazil’s growing confidence and desire to play a more hands-on role in global nuclear affairs manifested itself in negotiating the Brazil-Turkey-Iran Tehran Declaration. The initiative left a contradictory legacy and added to tensions between Brazil and the United States but at the very least, Brazil’s bold attempt at brokering a complicated international standoff made observers curious about Brazil’s ambitions and potential. Brazil is still in the process of establishing itself on the global scene including in the nuclear realm. Brasília, for the foreseeable future, will face the paradox of criticizing the unfairness of nuclear order while attempting to carve out a role for itself in it....

The chapter “Brazil and the Global Nuclear Order” was originally published in the book Brazil on the Global Stage: Power, Ideas, and the Liberal International Order. More information about the book can be found here. 

About the Author

Togzhan Kassenova
Togzhan Kassenova

Former Nonresident Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program

Kassenova was a nonresident fellow in the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment.

    Recent Work

  • Commentary
    How Kazakhstan Fought Back Against Soviet Nuclear Tests
      • Togzhan Kassenova

      Togzhan Kassenova

  • Report
    Perspectives on the Evolving Nuclear Order
      • Togzhan Kassenova

      Toby Dalton, Togzhan Kassenova, Lauryn Williams

Togzhan Kassenova
Former Nonresident Fellow, Nuclear Policy Program
Togzhan Kassenova
Nuclear PolicyArms ControlNuclear EnergyNorth AmericaSouth America

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • The nuclear missile formation passes through Tian'anmen Square during a military parade on September 3, 2025 in Beijing, China.
    Paper
    Untangling the Nuclear Knot: A Constructive Agenda for Managing China’s Nuclear Relations with the United States and Its Allies

    The nuclear relationship between China and the United States is increasingly shaped by widening perception gaps rather than deliberate strategic design.

      Tong Zhao

  • .S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright speaks with Venezuela's interim president, Delcy Rodríguez during a press conference regarding the oil agreement reached by the US government and Venezuela on September 2, 2026 in Caracas, Venezuela.
    Paper
    Recasting American Power in Latin America

    Washington needs to recognize that influence in the Western Hemisphere comes from presence, delivery, and reliability. It also must recognize that while the United States remains the key external actor, it no longer operates in a permissive environment and cannot presume deference from regional players who have other options, namely China.

      Juan S. Gonzalez

  • Research
    In Pursuit of Nuclear-Powered Submarines: Australia, South Korea, And Japan

    A look at why states without nuclear weapons are seeking naval nuclear propulsion, whether they can legally and technically deliver it, what it will cost them, and what responsible stewardship of the capability would look like.

      Jamie Kwong

  • Trump and MBS walking across a stage
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Is the U.S.-Saudi Nuclear Deal Moving From the Gold Standard to a Gilded Standard?

    Congress should ask tough questions about the agreement’s more unique features and whether they advance U.S. interests or compromise them.

      • Jane Darby Menton

      Jane Darby Menton

  • military personnel on a boat
    Commentary
    Emissary
    The Achilles’ Heel of the Shield of the Americas

    By focusing only on hard security, the Shield ignores the conditions that fuel cartel power.

      • Alejandro Rodriguez
      • Kayly Ober

      Alejandro Martin Rodriguez, Kayly Ober

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.