• Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
Carnegie Global logoCarnegie lettermark logo
DemocracyIran
  • Donate
{
  "authors": [
    "Arushi Kumar"
  ],
  "type": "legacyinthemedia",
  "centerAffiliationAll": "",
  "centers": [
    "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
    "Carnegie India",
    "Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
  ],
  "collections": [],
  "englishNewsletterAll": "",
  "nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
  "primaryCenter": "Carnegie India",
  "programAffiliation": "",
  "programs": [],
  "projects": [],
  "regions": [
    "South Asia",
    "Afghanistan",
    "Middle East",
    "Iran"
  ],
  "topics": [
    "Economy",
    "Foreign Policy"
  ]
}

Source: Getty

In The Media
Carnegie India

India and Iran Are Critical to Connectivity in Afghanistan

Regional connectivity projects give Afghanistan a substantive trading alternative to Pakistan and provide a powerful mechanism for trade and economic development.

Link Copied
By Arushi Kumar
Published on Aug 9, 2017

Source: Economic Times

Afghanistan has traditionally relied on overland and maritime routes through Pakistan for international trade. In recent times, Pakistan has unilaterally initiated border closures at regular intervals to economically pressure Afghanistan. Regional connectivity projects, such as India’s ambitious proposal to build the Chabahar Port in Iran and the US’ New Silk Road project, give Afghanistan a substantive trading alternative to its fickle neighbour and provide a powerful mechanism for trade and economic development. Both India and the US should leverage their growing strategic convergence to bolster Afghanistan’s economic capacity by integrating it with its neighbourhood through commercial ties. This would allow it to attract new sources of foreign investment and create employment so it is no longer dependant on foreign aid.

While India has remained actively engaged in Afghanistan’s economic and infrastructural development since 2001 by contributing over $2 billion in aid, President Trump’s May budget proposal revived the New Silk Road infrastructure project, first conceived in 2011. The project envisages economic growth and stability in Afghanistan by connecting it with the economies of Central Asia through multilateral development banks, private sector investments, and regional trade blocs.

The cornerstone of India’s connectivity plans in the region is the India-Iran Agreement for the development of the Chabahar Port in Iran. The port, deemed the gateway to ‘golden opportunities’ by Road Transport, Highways and Shipping Minister Nitin Gadkari, would allow India to access Afghanistan directly while circumventing Pakistan, and would link it to a network of trade corridors like the International North South Transport Corridor that allow access to Europe through Central Asia. India is also financing the Zaranj-Delaram Highway in Afghanistan, which connects the Garland Highway, linked to all Afghan cities, to Chabahar and provides Afghanistan stable access to regional markets.

While the Chabahar Port was conceptualized at the New Delhi Declaration in 2003, progress has stalled due to Western sanctions on Iran. Following the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) between the P5+1 and Iran in 2015, India, Iran, and Afghanistan stepped up engagement in 2016 and agreed to speedily implement the Agreement. At this juncture, where it is crucial that India match its diplomatic outreach with concrete efforts to deepen long-term engagement on connectivity, India should work with the United States to ensure Iran has the space to effectively gain commercial momentum after international sanctions were lifted.

The principal challenge to developing the Chabahar Port is the uncertainty among financiers and terminal operators given a series of mixed signals from the Trump administration towards Iran. The White House imposed new sanctions on Iran a day after it certified to Congress that Iran has complied with the JCPOA. Commercial ties between both nations appear to be improving, with Boeing signing a $3 billion deal with an Iranian airline for thirty 737 jets with an option for thirty more, which will likely create thousands of jobs in the United States. Finally, the re-election of President Hassan Rouhani, who won by a landslide against the conservative cleric Ebrahim Raisi, represents a mandate from the Iranian people to remain engaged with the global economy.

The Trump administration has taken the right step by revitalising plans for the New Silk Road infrastructure project. However, the US will squander this opportunity if it lacks the strategic foresight to recognize Iran’s critical role and work closely with partners like India to strengthen Afghanistan’s connectivity and economic capacity.

This article was originally published in the Economic Times.

About the Author

Arushi Kumar

Arushi Kumar
EconomyForeign PolicySouth AsiaAfghanistanMiddle EastIran

Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.

More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Why Russia Could Escalate Hybrid Warfare Against Europe

    Mounting economic strain and battlefield losses will not necessarily make the Kremlin less dangerous. They could instead push Moscow toward a more aggressive hybrid campaign designed to test NATO’s Eastern flank, exploit allied hesitation, and fracture European resolve.

      Maksym Beznosiuk

  • Hands holding up a book on a beach
    Commentary
    Emissary
    Carnegie’s Summer Beach Reads

    Carnegie experts recommend the books that kept them turning pages—and learning along the way.


      • Steve Feldstein
      • +8

      Sophia Besch, Eric Ciaramella, Steve Feldstein, …

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    Taking the Pulse: Enough with the Annual NATO Summits, Already?

    Over the past ten years, NATO has held almost as many summits as it did during the entirety of the Cold War. Are they still useful, or is it time to stop holding annual meetings?

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz, ed.

  • exterior of a building
    Commentary
    Emissary
    What’s Driving the Trump Administration’s Push to Dismantle the ICC?

    The move is an escalation of its war on multilateralism.

      Stewart Patrick

  • Commentary
    Strategic Europe
    European Sycophancy Worked on Trump

    Nearly a year and a half after Europeans leaned into sucking up to Trump, the strategy has produced some benefits when it comes to Ukraine.

      • Rym Momtaz

      Rym Momtaz

Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Carnegie global logo, stacked
1779 Massachusetts Avenue NWWashington, DC, 20036-2103Phone: 202 483 7600
  • Research
  • Emissary
  • About
  • Experts
  • Donate
  • Programs
  • Events
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts
  • Contact
  • Annual Reports
  • Careers
  • Privacy
  • For Media
  • Government Resources
Get more news and analysis from
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
© 2026 Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. All rights reserved.