Commentary
Yukon Huang, Isaac B. Kardon, Matt Sheehan
{
"authors": [
"Yukon Huang"
],
"type": "other",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie China"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "asia",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "AP",
"programs": [
"Asia"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"North America",
"United States",
"East Asia",
"China"
],
"topics": [
"Economy",
"Trade",
"Foreign Policy"
]
}
Source: Getty
Other
U.S.-China Tensions: Interplay Between Economics and Politics
The potential for the United States and China to have conflict over trade and foreign investment is now greater, not because of differences in political systems and cultural norms, but because of commonalities in Trump’s and Xi’s personal aspirations.
By Yukon Huang
Published on Oct 27, 2017
Source: Washington Journal of Modern China
The agreement reached during President Xi’s April 2017 meeting with President Trump at Mar-a-Lago on a 100 day plan to ease trade tensions did not have a long shelf life. For several months, the agreement appeared to have defused any intentions to consider more contentious protectionist measures. Accusations regarding currency manipulations also evaporated, as did concerns about cyber-security violations for economic gain. From China’s perspective, President Trump’s assurance that the U.S. would not play the Taiwan card removed the most contentious of concerns from the agenda. All this seemed to suggest economic issues would not become intertwined with security and political concerns. Yet, over the summer, signs that this would not necessarily be the case become apparent and this was confirmed by the lack of significant progress in the July U.S.-China Comprehensive Economic Dialogue (CED).
The likelihood that trade and foreign investment factors will continue to be a source of tension is discussed in my recently published book: Cracking the China Conundrum―Why Conventional Economic Wisdom Is Wrong (Oxford University Press, July 2017). These tensions stem in part from basic misunderstandings of the nature of the trade and investment relations between the U.S. and China that has contributed to an unnecessarily antagonistic relationship. These negative and highly emotional perceptions are nurtured by insecurities in the mindsets of both nations and reflect the mistrust between their respective civilian and military leaders. Contrasting political systems and cultural norms of society have always made it difficult for these two nations to work together. But ironically, with President Trump’s election and President Xi’s consolidation of authority, the potential for conflict is now greater not because of these differences but because of commonalities in their personal aspirations....
The article was originally published in Washington Journal of Modern China.
About the Author
Yukon Huang
Senior Fellow, Asia Program
Huang is a senior fellow in the Carnegie Asia Program where his research focuses on China’s economy and its regional and global impact.
- Three Takeaways From the Biden-Xi Meeting
- Europe Narrowly Navigates De-risking Between Washington and BeijingCommentary
Yukon Huang, Genevieve Slosberg
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- From Labor Scarcity to AI Society: Governing Productivity in East AsiaArticle
The debate over AI and work too often centers on displacement. Facing aging populations and shrinking workforces, East Asian policymakers view AI not as a threat, but as a cross-sectoral workforce strategy.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Sophie Zhuang
- Governing AI in the Shadow of Giants: Korea’s Strategic Response to Great Power AI CompetitionArticle
In its version of an AI middle power strategy, Seoul is pursuing alignment with the United States not as an endpoint but as a strategy to build industrial and geopolitical leverage. Whether this balance holds remains an open question.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares, Seungjoo Lee
- Is China’s High-Quality Investment Output Economically Viable?Commentary
China’s rapid technological progress and its first-rate infrastructure are often cited as refuting the claim that China has been systematically overinvesting in non-productive projects for many years. In fact, as the logic of overinvestment and the many historical precedents show, the former is all-too-often consistent with the latter.
Michael Pettis
- The Much-Touted Middle Corridor Transport Route Could Prove a Dead EndCommentary
For the Middle Corridor to fulfill its promises, one of these routes must become scalable. At present, neither is.
Friedrich Conradi
- The Iran War Shows the Limits of U.S. PowerArticle
If Washington cannot adapt to the ongoing transformations of a multipolar world, its superiority will become a liability.
Amr Hamzawy
