Cornelius Adebahr
{
"authors": [
"Cornelius Adebahr"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"Carnegie Europe",
"Malcolm H. Kerr Carnegie Middle East Center"
],
"collections": [
"Europe’s Southern Neighborhood",
"Arab Awakening"
],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Europe",
"programAffiliation": "EP",
"programs": [
"Europe"
],
"projects": [],
"regions": [
"Middle East",
"Iran"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}Source: Getty
Here’s Why the Iran Protests Matter
An economy in tatters, rampant corruption, and rising food prices are prompting ordinary Iranians to take to the streets.
Source: International Politics and Society
Violent demonstrations are taking place in cities across Iran, in the largest display of public discontent since 2009’s Green Movement demonstrations. But this time it’s ordinary people, rather than a middle-class elite, that are taking to the street. Hannes Alpen asked political scientist Cornelius Adebahr what makes the current protests different.
The protests in Iran came as a surprise to many observers. What are they about?
It’s difficult to work out what the central message of the protests actually is. They’re sporadic, badly organised, and there isn’t a central team of organisers behind them.
But a couple of themes stand out. Economic problems like price rises and unemployment are central. People are chanting anti-government slogans. They’ve been ripping down pictures of the Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, and some protestors have attacked police stations.
The protestors aren’t really distinguishing between the government of President Hassan Rouhani, who has acknowledged a number of their complaints, and the hardliners surrounding Khamenei, who has blamed the unrest on meddling from abroad.
The protests are particularly unsettling for Iran’s political class, because they are questioning the very system on which their power is based. Protests in 2009 led by the Iranian ‘Green Movement’ were a different beast. Reformers were campaigning against electoral fraud, but they never expressed a wish to overturn the Islamic Republic altogether.
Both the moderates and the conservatives will be tempted to use the current unrest for their own political ends. That would be a mistake.
US president Donald Trump has tweeted his support for the protestors. Will his messages have an impact on the situation there?
Let’s hope they have no impact on the situation in Iran.
For starters, Trump’s intervention will only lend credence to the regime’s claim that foreign powers are behind the protests. Considering the US’ numerous secret service operations against Iran since the coup of 1953, it’s an easy line for the regime to peddle.
At the same time, the US president is no guarantor of freedom and democracy, neither at home nor in regional politics abroad.
Are Iranians likely to welcome the support of someone who’s banned them from entering his country, and who performed a sword dance with the ruler of [their enemy] Saudi Arabia?
Of course, the Iranians who’ve taken their protest to the streets deserve our sympathy and recognition. But this is no moral basis on which to form a concrete policy.
And Trump has not indicated how he plans to support the protestors concretely. The US certainly hasn’t made any funds available for this purpose.
Can you say what impact the protests will have on Iran itself?
It’s not yet clear how the riots will develop, but I think it’s safe to say they will already have impacted the country to some extent.
The regime has been left shaken. Their main supporter base – ordinary, working-class people – are now turning their backs on the government.
Ordinary people feel detached from the elites. Thanks to social media, they can see how well officials are doing financially, and compare it to their own pitiful situation.
Middle-class Iranians who were behind the Green Movement have stayed away from the protests so far, but even they must appreciate the suffering of their working-class counterparts. This middle class is still putting its hope in President Rouhani’s gradual programme of reform, although there’s been little to show for it. There’s a debate going on in Iran as to whether the lack of progress is down to Rouhani, or to obstruction from hardliners.
The demonstrators are also criticising Tehran’s engagement in countries like Syria, Lebanon and the Palestinian Territories. Even if the regime manages to calm the protests down, it can’t just carry on as it did before. But it will try to keep up its foreign engagements, whilst trying to improve living standards for ordinary Iranians.
This interview was originally published by International Politics and Society.
About the Author
Former Nonresident Fellow, Carnegie Europe
Cornelius Adebahr was a nonresident fellow at Carnegie Europe. His research focuses on foreign and security policy, in particular regarding Iran and the Persian Gulf, on European and transatlantic affairs, and on citizens’ engagement.
- EU-Iran: Time to Revisit Assumptions and StrategizeCommentary
- Making an Inclusive EU Strategy on Iran a RealityResearch
Cornelius Adebahr, Barbara Mittelhammer
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- What the Russian Energy Sector Stands to Gain From War in the Middle EastCommentary
The future trajectory of the U.S.-Iran war remains uncertain, but its impact on global energy trade flows and ties will be far-reaching. Moscow is likely to become a key beneficiary of these changes; the crisis in the Gulf also strengthens Russia’s hand in its relationships with China and India, where advantages might prove more durable.
Sergey Vakulenko
- Beyond Oil: Hormuz Closure Puts Russia in the Lead in the Fertilizer MarketCommentary
The Kremlin expects to not only profit from rising fertilizer prices but also exact revenge for the collapse of the 2023 grain deal.
Alexandra Prokopenko
- The Problem With the Idea That Netanyahu Made Trump Attack IranCommentary
Going to war was the U.S. president’s decision, for which he alone is responsible.
Daniel C. Kurtzer, Aaron David Miller
- The Diverging U.S. and Israeli Goals in Iran Are Making the Endgame Even MurkierCommentary
The cracks between Trump and Netanyahu have become more pronounced, particularly over energy and leadership targets.
Eric Lob
- How the Hormuz Closure Is Testing the Korean President’s Progressive AgendaCommentary
The crisis is not just a story of energy vulnerability. It’s also a complex, high-stakes political challenge.
Darcie Draudt-Véjares