Paul Stronski
{
"authors": [
"Paul Stronski"
],
"type": "legacyinthemedia",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [
"Changing Geopolitics of Eurasia"
],
"regions": [
"Central Asia",
"Kazakhstan"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}Source: Getty
Is Kazakhstan Preparing for a Post-Nazarbayev Era?
Kazakhstan’s political system is quite opaque, so it is not clear what exactly is driving recent changes in the senior ranks of the government. What is clear, however, is that Kazakh society is growing restless, as socioeconomic problems in the country grow.
Source: World Politics Review
Since he turned 78 in July, Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev has appointed a number of new ministers to his Cabinet, fueling speculation about whether he will run for another term in elections scheduled for 2020. Such speculation is not new in Kazakhstan, but given Nazarbayev’s advanced age, observers fear that without a clearly defined succession plan, the country’s stability could deteriorate. In an email interview with WPR, Paul Stronski, a senior fellow in the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, discusses Kazakhstan’s political outlook.
World Politics Review: What is driving Nazarbayev’s ongoing Cabinet reshuffle?
Paul Stronski: There has been a fair amount of change in the senior ranks of the Kazakh government since August, with Nazarbayev appointing a new defense minister, finance minister, head of the presidential administration, secretary of the country’s Security Council and mayor of Astana, the capital, along with several other lower-level personnel changes. In July, Nazarbayev also became chairman of the Security Council, a position he can hold for life. Recent legislative changes have transformed the Security Council from an advisory body to one with greater power to craft and implement state policy, so it truly is a government in flux. However, Kazakhstan’s political system is quite opaque, so it is not clear what exactly is driving these changes. This lack of transparency creates a robust rumor mill about the rise and fall of various Kazakh political factions, and swift changes inevitably foster speculation that Nazarbayev is preparing for succession. All of this may or may not be true.
What is clear, however, is that Kazakh society is growing restless, as socioeconomic problems in the country grow. Floods devastated parts of Astana this summer, causing a backlash at government officials and anger about shoddy construction in a city that is just 20 years old. The commercial capital of Almaty was rocked in July by the murder of a 25-year-old figure skater, Denis Ten, who was a bronze medalist at the Sochi Olympics and one of the country’s famous sons. Ten’s murder highlighted growing social problems in the country’s rapidly urbanizing areas, including rising crime, disenfranchised urban poor, growing wealth gaps and a lack of public faith in the police. To make matters worse, Kazakhstan’s currency, the tenge, has dropped in value by over 14 percent relative to the dollar since January, and the government is nervous about any possibility of protests. So, the Cabinet reshuffle may also be intended to show that the government is responding to these challenges, although there are no quick fixes to the country’s problems...
This article was originally published by World Politics Review.
About the Author
Former Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program
Paul Stronski was a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program, where his research focuses on the relationship between Russia and neighboring countries in Central Asia and the South Caucasus.
- Russia’s Growing Footprint in Africa’s Sahel RegionArticle
- Russia in the Balkans After Ukraine: A Troubling ActorCommentary
Paul Stronski
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- After Ilia II: What Will a New Patriarch Mean for Georgia?Commentary
The front-runner to succeed Ilia II, Metropolitan Shio, is prone to harsh anti-Western rhetoric and frequent criticism of “liberal ideologies” that he claims threaten the Georgian state. This raises fears that under his leadership the Georgian Orthodox Church will lose its unifying role and become an instrument of ultraconservative ideology.
Bashir Kitachaev
- Tokayev’s New Constitution Is a Bet on Stability—At Freedom’s ExpenseCommentary
Kazakhstan’s new constitution is an embodiment of the ruling elite’s fears and a self-serving attempt to preserve the status quo while they still can.
Serik Beysembaev
- Why Has Kazakhstan Started Deporting Political Activists?Commentary
The current U.S. indifference to human rights means Astana no longer has any incentive to refuse extradition requests from its authoritarian neighbors—including Russia.
Temur Umarov
- The EU Needs a Third Way in IranCommentary
European reactions to the war in Iran have lost sight of wider political dynamics. The EU must position itself for the next phase of the crisis without giving up on its principles.
Richard Youngs
- The Kremlin Is Destroying Its Own System of Coerced VotingCommentary
The use of technology to mobilize Russians to vote—a system tied to the relative material well-being of the electorate, its high dependence on the state, and a far-reaching system of digital control—is breaking down.
Andrey Pertsev