Paul Stronski
{
"authors": [
"Paul Stronski"
],
"type": "commentary",
"centerAffiliationAll": "dc",
"centers": [
"Carnegie Endowment for International Peace"
],
"collections": [],
"englishNewsletterAll": "ctw",
"nonEnglishNewsletterAll": "",
"primaryCenter": "Carnegie Endowment for International Peace",
"programAffiliation": "russia",
"programs": [
"Russia and Eurasia"
],
"projects": [
"Changing Geopolitics of Eurasia"
],
"regions": [
"Central Asia",
"Kazakhstan"
],
"topics": [
"Political Reform"
]
}Source: Getty
Kazakhstan’s Autocratic President Resigns. What Happens Next?
President Nursultan Nazarbayev has resigned after nearly three decades. But the succession process appears to have just started, and it won’t be the last we will see of his influence.
What has happened?
Kazakhstan’s seventy-eight-year-old President Nursultan Nazarbayev announced his resignation on March 19, after leading the Central Asian country for almost thirty years. Given his long-standing hold on power and the country’s position as the region’s economic powerhouse, this news sent shockwaves through Central Asia. The speaker of the upper house of Kazakhstan’s parliament, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, was sworn in as acting president a day later. He will serve until the next election, which is scheduled for 2020. Parliament subsequently elected Dariga Narzarbayeva, the former president’s daughter, to replace Tokayev as speaker, officially putting her in the constitutional line of succession.
Why it matters
The transition is occurring at a time of increased geopolitical uncertainty for Kazakhstan, with an assertive Russia to the north and an economically ambitious China to the east. Nazarbayev astutely managed these difficult relationships, while creating positive ties with the West. Tokayev, a former foreign Minister, is a well-respected figure in Kazakhstan’s three most important foreign partners, Russia, China and the United States. He appears likely to continue that tradition.
Kazakhstan also faces deep domestic challenges. Rising discontent over income inequality, poor governance, and growing social problems led to sporadic protests in the country’s two most important cities, as well as in oil-rich western Kazakhstan.
With a growing sense of economic stagnation and social malaise, Nazarbayev’s resignation is bound to divert attention away from these problems, at least for now. But what the country needs are systemic economic reforms to diversify the economy away from hydrocarbons, create jobs and reduce poverty. Such reforms are unlikely during a transition period.
What is next?
Nazarbayev’s departure from the presidency does not necessarily reduce his influence. Constitutional changes in 2017 weakened the power of the Kazakh president, and strengthened the clout of the Security Council, which Nazarbayev will continue to chair. That position will give him influence over the country’s foreign policy and security trajectory. Meanwhile, his title as “Leader of the Nation” and head of the ruling party allow him to influence domestic matters for the foreseeable future.
Nonetheless, Nazarbayev’s resignation sets him apart from other post-Soviet Central Asian leaders, who have died in office or been overthrown in popular revolts.
Nazarbayev also has filled key positions with close allies, including Tokayev, Nazarbayeva and Karim Massimov, a former Prime Minister who now heads the country’s security services. Perhaps in a signal that transition was imminent, Massimov was elevated to the military rank of General Major the day before Nazarbayev’s surprise resignation announcement. Nazarbayev likely believes that this sort of transition will secure his family’s wellbeing, and help assure stability in the country as the transition plays out.
About the Author
Former Senior Fellow, Russia and Eurasia Program
Paul Stronski was a senior fellow in Carnegie’s Russia and Eurasia Program, where his research focuses on the relationship between Russia and neighboring countries in Central Asia and the South Caucasus.
- Russia’s Growing Footprint in Africa’s Sahel RegionArticle
- Russia in the Balkans After Ukraine: A Troubling ActorCommentary
Paul Stronski
Recent Work
Carnegie does not take institutional positions on public policy issues; the views represented herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Carnegie, its staff, or its trustees.
More Work from Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
- Leaving Russian-Speakers Without Representation Is a Risk for LatviaCommentary
If the Russian-speaking community in Latvia cannot articulate their interests without being seen as disloyal, they could end up embracing a pro-Kremlin agenda.
Sergejs Potapkins
- Putin Has Been a Hindrance, Not a Help, to United Russia’s Election CampaignCommentary
Russia’s ruling party would have benefited from Putin appearing as its distant patron, but as an active frontman imposing his views on the public, he has done nothing but harm both the party’s election campaign and the ruling system overall.
Andrey Pertsev
- Ten Years After Karimov’s Death, How Much Has Uzbekistan Really Changed?Commentary
In the tenth year of his presidency, President Mirziyoyev’s system is becoming even more personalized than that of his predecessor Karimov.
Galiya Ibragimova
- As It Turns 25, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Reflects the New World OrderCommentary
With the growth in points of friction between the great powers, organizations like the SCO will continue to play a role in the strategic adaptation of the smaller powers caught between them.
Temur Umarov
- Is the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Performance Art or Meaningful Collaboration?Commentary
Xi, Putin, and other regional leaders are back-slapping in Bishkek, but the SCO has yet to answer the most serious questions about continental Asia's economic future.
Evan A. Feigenbaum